Matthew Hopkins

for whatever reason you think you'll need a night vision optic, you don't need to sell off half of your collection for one, a vast majority of them fall under 1,000 dollar range

well this 50-something, actual 58, won't spend a penny to see it, or even watch it if it comes on TV. 1.5 hours of special effects does not make a good movie, never has and never will. and that is all these movies now-a-days are, stupid plots, bad acting etc.. but throw in a lot of special effects, and morons will say, "wow, that was a great movie!". fucking morons wouldn't know what a good movie is if it came and bit them in the ass.

IMO, it simply isn't worth the time or expense to do something like that

I found a video of jim rickards when he was a child, very telling of the type of guy he grew up to be

for those of you who say; well, here is your opportunity to get a job driving them around

I'm with Doc, this clearly isn't a military problem. asshole rioters is clearly a police problem and civilian leadership problem. if they can't handle it, it's time for them to turn in their badges and cushy jobs and find a new line of work more suited to them, like in the fast food industry. but, I have this hunch they would fail miserably at that as well

that "blogger" isn't a messenger but a manure spreader.

well fuck, you got me, yes it was me who posted that letter. I also have the key to the runic stone they found in Mn. and I am a member Bohemia Grove. I also know where the white house corner stone is, it's in my basement next to the ark of the covenant

don't tell me you'll be working for those 2 old hippies BEN AND JERRY.

if you go by the features, you can only have one feature. now I'm no lawyer, but I play one on the internet and I slept at a HOLIDAY INN, once . but to me, it seems that if you can make it so that the magazine no longer detachable and can't hold more then 7 "rounds" then you can put a thumbhole stock on it. possibly a pistol grip but the questions becomes, how do they consider a magazine being "fixed"? and how do you load the mag if it is fixed? disclaimer: don't take this as legal advice. I don't believe the defense, "but your honor, Matthew Hopkins on the SAIGA 12 board said

according to your new law thumbhole stocks is not a "grey area", they consider that as a "assault weapon feature" go to Pg 3, the definitions is there http://www.nypdcea.org/pdfs/NYSP_Safe_Act_Field_Guide.pdf

yeah, and at around 8:00 AM today I took a big shit. my shitting a log and that "blog" came from the same place, some asshole. "Rumor on the web today" is all you needed to read before sending this "blog" where it belongs, down the sewer pipe and not go smearing it all over the walls of the bathroom.

I have found that the TAPCO GALIL/GOLINI mag works in a SAR3

GREAT JOB, Grima! I like it when someone steps up and makes something they want using a bit of ingenuity and currently available parts/mags, instead of whining or waiting on someone else to do it, which never materializes Kudos!!!

. . . you can only load 29 . . . Is this because the 5.56 rounds are a little fatter than 5.45 rounds making it so that only 29 5.56 rounds will fit, or will 30 5.56 rounds fit but the 30th round won't feed? not any of those, when I epoxy the 5.56 follower onto the 5.45 follower that made the "new" follower much thicker. I can always cut the "skirt" on the follower shorter to make more room for that 30th round but I can live with 29 rounds in the mag

I already proved my point he's full of shit, it simply isn't worth discussing any further with you, you have it in your tiny little dweeb mind, he's the "all powerful and knowing" so enjoy

used in ancient times, come on now I know you're not that dumb, what did you think when he said that? that ancients had jet fighters? no, you believed that these were beheading machines like all the other followers of this nut job. in any event, if you want to swallow all the steamy pile of BS he is feeding you, then all I can say is bon appetite and don't forget to ask for seconds, I'm sure he'll oblige you

Until you actually do research on many of the articles you call bs. He speculates much more than he should, but he dont make shit up. You can discredit him all you want, but how about you actually disprove him? he isn't that hard to disprove, he wrote up the government is buying guillotines along with the other nut job sites. the kernel of truth is that the military did buy guillotines , but it was all wrapped up in his wack jobbery made up BS that these are kind of guillotines that will be used to cut people's head off in "FEMA camps" what those guillotines the military bou

wow, that's a great deal, almost like going back in time with that kind of price. I bought a butt load of mags when they were that price, years and years and years ago for those that need mags and don't take advantage of this, you'll be sorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry

that's the small kernel of truth, the rest of it is alex just being alex or more precisely this wack job since he wrote that up

alex jones is very well know for taking a small kernel of truth and then wrapping it all up with BS.

I would never take what that shitty rag says about guns, they take money from manufacturers to give "glowing reviews" and not honest ones

actually that would be; errrrrrrrr, dey tuk errr vooots

that's the wrong way to say that, you're suppose to say it like this: