judcargile

Because it does the same thing every time, that is what makes it better than the Colt and I am the technician who is backing that to include sub MOA results in my territory. It ain't no big deal. The PNP can adjust qualification standards for the good of the contract. and we will outperform every competitor. We will not win the contract, but, we will win the testing to spec and delivery. It will be bragging rights from here on out and we will beat them every time. All of them.

Go back and repeat Retail Price and Bid real slow until you feel stupid!!! DROP!!! D-R-O-P!!!!!! AND BEAT YOUR FACE!!!!!!

Mistake IMO. I won't touch Anything Remington makes for multiple reasons and definitely wouldn't chose them over Colt or Sig. I have a Colt M4 (obviously without FA sear) and after shooting it, its my favorite AR I've shot or owned between about 8 different AR's. And the Sig M400 is their version of the M4 and from everything I read they're as good or better than the Colt I think I would have paid a little more and went with a company known to make good M4's. Hope they don't send a bunch of R-15's over there lol Based on what reason do you think a militarized version of the R15 is not as

We gave a presentation on our TR15 for this project and could not have done a true M4 for $960, that is just the way things are. We could not qualify for the bid because we have never done 25K pieces in on order to a single customer. We even began negotiations with Armalite to do a joint venture on this bid and even Armalite could not come close to a single order of 25K to a single customer. I am surprised what order Remington used to qualify as "similar product". I have never heard of Remington as a military contract to the US or any other country, but, Remington does not clear everything wit