Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hillary Clinton

Voted for a 10-year extension of the assault weapons ban. Voted for requiring extensive background checks at gun shows. Supports licensing and registration of handguns, mandatory trigger locks for handguns, holding adults responsible for their children's use of guns, raising the youth handgun ban from age 18 to 21, limiting gun sales to one per month and allowing the Consumer Products Safety Commission regulate guns.

 

Barack Obama

Supports extending the assault weapons ban. Supports national law against carrying concealed weapons, with exceptions for retired police and military personnel. Supports limiting gun sales to one per month

 

John McCain

Sponsored legislation requiring background checks at gun shows. Voted against a 10-year extension of the assault weapons ban. Opposed legislation requiring trigger locks for handguns. Opposed 1994 crime bill, which contained the assault weapons ban. Has a C+ rating from the NRA.

 

I can't stand McCain but would somebody tell me what good it will do letting Osama Obama or Hitlery Klinton win by voting for Ron Paul or Huckabee? Educate me, just wondering.

 

1911

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, and I have never understood the love of ROMNEY (WHO "WOULDNT LIFT A FINGER TO REPEAL" HIS STATES GUN LAWS) It sucks that yet again we are stuck with the lesser of 2 (or 3) evils, but at least McCain is patriotic. He sucks in many other ways, but we have to get the one who is closest to a decent person in.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I can't stand McCain but would somebody tell me what good it will do letting Osama Obama or Hitlery Klinton win by voting for Ron Paul or Huckabee? Educate me, just wondering.

1911

 

What good will it do by voting for Ron Paul is simply he is the only one who can take on Obama or Clinton. The undecided voters will go Democrap over McCain or Hucklebee. When most people are given the chance to hear Dr. Paul, they are on board with honesty, integrity, and TRUE change, not lip service change. I assume you're a republican 1911. You can't stand McCain, and you are hardly in the minority of Republicans.

 

If you don't want Hillary or Obama, think real hard before you vote for someone who can't take them on once the general election is in effect.

 

Americans are tired if not totally disgusted with the Republican Party. Ron Paul can beat Hillary or Obama as well as he is the one most likely to save the party.

 

Don't buy into the he can't win b.s. Run the numbers on delegates... McCain is not a lock for the nomination. This can very likely result in a brokered convention.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't buy into the he can't win b.s. Run the numbers on delegates... McCain is not a lock for the nomination. This can very likely result in a brokered convention.

 

 

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries...corecard/#val=R

 

McCain 918

Romney 286

Huckster 217

Paul 16

 

I'm no political analyst, but I'd say its gonna be McCain.

Ron Paul's smart and knows the numbers but he lacks charisma. being an OB/Gyn, he surely knows how to deal with pussies, which would be great for managing liberals and the French, but he just aint gonna be the nominee. If he wasnt for pullout, he would have had a better showing IMO.

 

 

Our best hope is that McCain chooses a good conservative running mate. Even then, he'll have a hard time winning in November. the media had 8 years to stir up anti conservative sentiment, and they did a whole lot of it. Now they have the "rock stars" of the left and I really doubt a Repub can beat either of them. McCain cant count on the conservative base, and if he goes around trying to pander to them, he loses the undecided and independent voters. Look how close it was in 04'.

 

Then again I was sure Kerry was gonna win and we lucked out then, so who knows......

Edited by chris410
Link to post
Share on other sites
Then again I was sure Kerry was gonna win and we lucked out then, so who knows......

 

That was the media again trying to influence the elections. Trying to make the American public believe Kerry was a shoe-in. :rolleyes:

 

And that's the reason why they were so incredulously pissed and dumbfounded when he got his ass handed to him on a silver platter by the (mostly) still Conservative voting base. :haha:

 

This election is different though. With Hillary and Obama running, all the minorities and dingbat liberal wacko women and their pussy-whipped husbands are sure to come out and vote. I still don't trust the media further than I spit though to give us accurate candidate numbers, I bet Paul's numbers are still much higher than are being reported. :unsure:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Then again I was sure Kerry was gonna win and we lucked out then, so who knows......

 

That was the media again trying to influence the elections. Trying to make the American public believe Kerry was a shoe-in. :rolleyes:

This election is different though. With Hillary and Obama running, all the minorities and dingbat liberal wacko women and their pussy-whipped husbands are sure to come out and vote. I still don't trust the media further than I spit though to give us accurate candidate numbers, I bet Paul's numbers are still much higher than are being reported. :unsure:

 

I agree 100% that the media does hype their leftist candidates, but I also was going by all the bumper stickers and anti bush sentiment in the public and in the entertainment industry. Really if we dont get the media to actually liberate themselves from the wallet of George Soros and the likes, we will never have true freedom, regardless of the party thats in charge, and the fact that both parties are mum on that subject makes me wonder if we really even have 2 parties anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I can't stand McCain but would somebody tell me what good it will do letting Osama Obama or Hitlery Klinton win by voting for Ron Paul or Huckabee? Educate me, just wondering.

1911

 

What good will it do by voting for Ron Paul is simply he is the only one who can take on Obama or Clinton. The undecided voters will go Democrap over McCain or Hucklebee. When most people are given the chance to hear Dr. Paul, they are on board with honesty, integrity, and TRUE change, not lip service change. I assume you're a republican 1911. You can't stand McCain, and you are hardly in the minority of Republicans.

 

If you don't want Hillary or Obama, think real hard before you vote for someone who can't take them on once the general election is in effect.

 

Americans are tired if not totally disgusted with the Republican Party. Ron Paul can beat Hillary or Obama as well as he is the one most likely to save the party.

 

Don't buy into the he can't win b.s. Run the numbers on delegates... McCain is not a lock for the nomination. This can very likely result in a brokered convention.

 

Ragnarock, I enjoy discussions with you and I'm not here to piss you off. But I've said before and I'll say again, Paul isn't electable because he doesn't have the name recognition. Should everyone that votes know who the heck is running. Duh? Yeah. But do you really think that everyone that votes goes online and researches all the candidates? I mean no disrespect but if you do, you're naive. Most people don't spend the time on the computer to do the research like we do. They get there 'news' from the MSM and they believe it. I know it sucks but that's the way it is. As I've said before, get this mans name out there. Do all you can to help him and maybe we'll only have 4 years of hell. It's up to people like you who are die hard believers.

If you all write in Pauls name, either the bitch or the empty suit WILL win. It truly sucks but it's true.

How about this? You guys write to the RNC and the DNC if you live in states that have no voice in the matter when it comes to the primaries, like me. I don't even have mine until May. Me and my fellow North Carolinians have had no voice in regards to who is the Republican nominee. I will definitely be writing both parties to state how I feel.

Link to post
Share on other sites

New video with Ron Paul talking about gun rights and McCaine making a ass of himself.

 

BTW-> Who says Fox doesn't give Ron Paul coverage....

 

So there idea of coverage is him on in the middle of the night when most are asleep and on a program I guess most have never even heard of :rolleyes: .

 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60TLhM83DEw...feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites
McCain 918

Romney 286

Huckster 217

Paul 16

 

I'm no political analyst, but I'd say its gonna be McCain.

 

These numbers were from 13 Feb.

 

McCain needs 395 bound delegates to reach 1191

 

Of the remaining states:

 

texas - 137 bound and 3 unbound

ohio - 88 UNBOUND

South Dakota - 24 bound and 3 unbound

wisconsin - 37 bound and 3 unbound

vermont - 17 bound

idaho - 26 bound and 6 unbound

hawaii - 20 bound

pennsylvannia - 74 UNBOUND

oregon - 27 bound and 3 unbound

puerto rico - 20 bound and 3 unbound

north carolina - 69 bound

indianna - 27 bound and 30 UNBOUND

kentucky - 45 bound

mississippi - 36 bound and 3 unbound

RI - 17 bound and 3 unbound

nebraska - 30 bound and 3 unbound

new mexico - 29 bound and 3 unbound

 

.

There are 561 bound delegates left of which McCain must win 71% of to reach 1191.....now when was the last time he won with 71% of the vote?

 

Now Hucklebee will probably win nebraska, kentucky, miss, and SD.......if this happens, then McCain would have to win just about every remaining delegate, and that is not likely to happen.

 

If McCain doesn't get those 71%, then the delegates at the convention need to give hime 51% of their votes. If he doesn't get the 51%, then there is a re-vote WITH ALL DELEGATES UNBOUND. Also keep in mind, all the candidates who dropped... their delegates are unbound.

 

Since the CFR bailed on pushing Hucklebee, he is now wanting a brokered convention. This would benefit Ron Paul tremendously. Ron Paul is getting robbed of votes left and right. In La., for example, RP should have 48 delegates from La. alone, but they fucked him out of those. This is why the brokered convention would benefit him.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ragnarock, I enjoy discussions with you and I'm not here to piss you off. But I've said before and I'll say again, Paul isn't electable because he doesn't have the name recognition. Should everyone that votes know who the heck is running. Duh? Yeah. But do you really think that everyone that votes goes online and researches all the candidates? I mean no disrespect but if you do, you're naive. Most people don't spend the time on the computer to do the research like we do. They get there 'news' from the MSM and they believe it. I know it sucks but that's the way it is. As I've said before, get this mans name out there. Do all you can to help him and maybe we'll only have 4 years of hell. It's up to people like you who are die hard believers.

If you all write in Pauls name, either the bitch or the empty suit WILL win. It truly sucks but it's true.

How about this? You guys write to the RNC and the DNC if you live in states that have no voice in the matter when it comes to the primaries, like me. I don't even have mine until May. Me and my fellow North Carolinians have had no voice in regards to who is the Republican nominee. I will definitely be writing both parties to state how I feel.

 

 

No problems Sandi :).

 

I agree whole heartedly with you that probably a large majority of people don't do much research other than what they are fed from the media. That's where the test should come in... right?

 

As I stated, I think in your "SHTF" thread, that's why people who believe in RP, as about 50% of those who also replied in that thread need to get off their asses and help get that name recognition out there. I have literature dropped over 750 houses in my area, with 2 more precincts (approx. 1600 homes) hopefully to get done by our primary in 13 days. After a precinct is done, they are followed up with a phone call. I also have plastered my metro area with 300 pole signs 7"x30" wide. I've burnt hundreds of DVD's and passed them out, left them at coffee shops and such.

 

I am hardly alone, there are hundreds of thousands of us calling, writing letters, canvassing, etc. throughout the country. People who would rather help with name recognition than sit there and vote for "the lesser of two evils" and assumptively blame others for a possibly worse than bad outcome come November; when in fact, they share part of the blame if the democraps get into office because instead of voting for who they agree with the most... they vote for a different piece of shit because of a perception effect caused by what the media is planting in most people's heads.

 

Also as I've stated before in various threads, this one included; McCain doesn't have the juice (money, character, plans, and policies) to beat either of the Democraps. Even If he was the only one running Sandi, he still won't win. He doesn't have the majority of backing from the RNC, Democraps won't jump over and support him based on his stated policies and plans (as Republicans are doing with Obama), Republicans are jumping ship either because they are disenfranchised with the party, or simply because they don't like McCain. The only support Hucklebee has are the religious folks. If that is their primary thing they are basing their vote on and they did their research, they'd back RP as well. Basing that on Hucklebee's radical religious endorsements given to him that he advertised as well as his voting record and other actions that clearly go against him being a truly spiritual person.

 

About you having no voice due to the date of your primary; I agree. I feel all the primaries should be on the same day for 24 hours. Open the polls at 12am est/9pm pst and run them for 24 hours. I feel as you stated, in late states primaries, those states get screwed. Another benefit of this plan is that unfortunately many people vote to be on a winning side. So I do believe that when the left side of the country people see that candidate abc is winning a right side of the country state, they're gonna vote for abc because they want to be on the winning side. Stoopid people. That's just like voting for something/someone based on how many lawn signs you see. I truly think if all the voting was at the same time for the entire country, it would eliminate the late voting "no voice" such as in your instance, as well as the media slanting the vote by reporting and people wanting to be on the winning side. A side note, in Wisconsin's primary last night, CNN was reporting McCain the winner WITH 0% REPORTING.

 

LOL, that's enough for now.. I'd imagine we shall continue this another time :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

All hail Ragnarock47! :super: Man do you know how to support a guy! You know all the fine technical stuff. I'll admit I can't figure out all this number stuff, I usually ask my friend can Ron Paul still win once a week. He knows all about the number game thing. The thing I do know how to do is tell everyone around me about Ron Paul to get his name and ideas out there. You sound like you are doing a lot to help Ron Paul and America.

 

I agree with you that all primaries should be on the same day for 24 hours. That way maybe all the "followers" could wake up and base there decisions on who would be right for America and not base it on what other people are doing and saying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I support Ron Paul, as well, but I'm gonna vote for McCain. I don't believe Dr. Paul has a chance of becoming the Rep. candidate.

I also don't believe "undecided" voters will fall into the Hitlery or Osama camps. I believe they are "undecided" because they have yet to be swayed by the Party BS (from either side) and I think once they figure out what kind of Socialist Fascist bullshit they will be force-fed by either of the Dem's, they, like I, will realize that there really is no choice to make.

Either certain US doom, or possible US doom....Hmmm....One heckuva choice, huh?

I would have been a lot more supportive of McCain prior to his "skipping down the legislative aisles" with Ted Kennedy on the "crimigrant amnesty travesty," but I'm not certain that issue is nearly as overwhelming as the consequences of Socialist/Fascist/possible Jihadist in the White House Oval Office.

Can you actually imagine referring to either of those two asshats as "Commander In Chief?" What a fuckin' oxymoron!

 

We're lookin' at some really frightening scenarios here. No time to be picky. IMHO, it's absolutely "lesser of two evils" time at the ballot box.

It's time to unify to DEFEAT candidates, not elect them....

 

Respectfully posted,

 

guido2 in Houston

Link to post
Share on other sites

The one thing about this election that just kills me is how many people want RP in and support RP but WON'T vote for him. I hear this on every board I am on.

 

If everyone who really wants RP in actually votes for him he will win by a landslide. Everyone thinks he can't win so they are going to vote for X person instead. I understand why people do this, but RP can not win if no one votes for him........

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, Nwcid

Well, if I thought RP had even a fighting chance of getting the nod against McCain I would agree. I guess what I am getting at, is that McCain will be the Repub. nominee. So, instead of steadily dis'n him and discussing reasons why we (and others) shouldn't vote for him, maybe it's time to step back and examine the result of NOT voting for McCain.

We need to bolster him up. He's the only realistic chance we have. I may not feel enthusiasm in my heart for McCain, but I feel fear in my heart for the alternatives.

 

Respectfully posted,

guido2 in Houston

 

 

The one thing about this election that just kills me is how many people want RP in and support RP but WON'T vote for him. I hear this on every board I am on.

 

If everyone who really wants RP in actually votes for him he will win by a landslide. Everyone thinks he can't win so they are going to vote for X person instead. I understand why people do this, but RP can not win if no one votes for him........

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello, Nwcid

Well, if I thought RP had even a fighting chance of getting the nod against McCain I would agree. I guess what I am getting at, is that McCain will be the Repub. nominee. So, instead of steadily dis'n him and discussing reasons why we (and others) shouldn't vote for him, maybe it's time to step back and examine the result of NOT voting for McCain.

We need to bolster him up. He's the only realistic chance we have. I may not feel enthusiasm in my heart for McCain, but I feel fear in my heart for the alternatives.

 

Respectfully posted,

guido2 in Houston

 

 

The one thing about this election that just kills me is how many people want RP in and support RP but WON'T vote for him. I hear this on every board I am on.

 

If everyone who really wants RP in actually votes for him he will win by a landslide. Everyone thinks he can't win so they are going to vote for X person instead. I understand why people do this, but RP can not win if no one votes for him........

 

 

 

.

 

 

I understand. Mostly just thinking out loud........

 

 

 

 

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see the leftist New York Times has decided to launch an "ethics" attack on McCain now. :rolleyes:

 

Like they couldn't dig up enough dirt on Shillery without lifting the shovel too much. :lol:

 

Bullshit the media doesn't try to control the election process. :angry:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This still doesn't answer Nwcid's original question though.

 

I agree with him. Why should we have to "damage control" with a flip-flopping "waffling" asshat like John McCain when Ron Paul is clearly the better choice for us *LAW ABIDING* gun-loving Conservative views types? :unsure:

 

Gun owners are our own worst enemies sometimes. We shoot ourselves in the ass :rolleyes:

 

Hello, Nwcid

Well, if I thought RP had even a fighting chance of getting the nod against McCain I would agree. I guess what I am getting at, is that McCain will be the Repub. nominee. So, instead of steadily dis'n him and discussing reasons why we (and others) shouldn't vote for him, maybe it's time to step back and examine the result of NOT voting for McCain.

We need to bolster him up. He's the only realistic chance we have. I may not feel enthusiasm in my heart for McCain, but I feel fear in my heart for the alternatives.

 

Respectfully posted,

guido2 in Houston

 

 

The one thing about this election that just kills me is how many people want RP in and support RP but WON'T vote for him. I hear this on every board I am on.

 

If everyone who really wants RP in actually votes for him he will win by a landslide. Everyone thinks he can't win so they are going to vote for X person instead. I understand why people do this, but RP can not win if no one votes for him........

 

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This still doesn't answer Nwcid's original question though.

 

I agree with him. Why should we have to "damage control" with a flip-flopping "waffling" asshat like John McCain when Ron Paul is clearly the better choice for us *LAW ABIDING* gun-loving Conservative views types? :unsure:

 

Gun owners are our own worst enemies sometimes. We shoot ourselves in the ass :rolleyes:

 

Personally I voted for Thompson and wrote in Hunter ,(VP)in the primary, both of whom are good choices for RTBA voters, and I dont think every gun owner is a RP supporter. I have a Libertarian rag with an article promoting that stupid loose change 9/11 conspiracy movie, and that kind of curbs my liking of that party. Also Ron Paul supports withdrawl, and that lost him votes. In the end though, I guess what is the point of ensuring democracy in Iraq if were loosing our rights back home.

 

Anyway just because RP didnt win doesnt mean every conservative voted for McCain. There were other worthy candidates.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This still doesn't answer Nwcid's original question though.

 

I agree with him. Why should we have to "damage control" with a flip-flopping "waffling" asshat like John McCain when Ron Paul is clearly the better choice for us *LAW ABIDING* gun-loving Conservative views types? :unsure:

 

Gun owners are our own worst enemies sometimes. We shoot ourselves in the ass :rolleyes:

 

Personally I voted for Thompson and wrote in Hunter ,(VP)in the primary, both of whom are good choices for RTBA voters, and I dont think every gun owner is a RP supporter. I have a Libertarian rag with an article promoting that stupid loose change 9/11 conspiracy movie, and that kind of curbs my liking of that party. Also Ron Paul supports withdrawl, and that lost him votes. In the end though, I guess what is the point of ensuring democracy in Iraq if were loosing our rights back home.

 

Anyway just because RP didnt win doesnt mean every conservative voted for McCain. There were other worthy candidates.

Link to post
Share on other sites
No problems Sandi :).

 

I agree whole heartedly with you that probably a large majority of people don't do much research other than what they are fed from the media. That's where the test should come in... right?

 

As I stated, I think in your "SHTF" thread, that's why people who believe in RP, as about 50% of those who also replied in that thread need to get off their asses and help get that name recognition out there. I have literature dropped over 750 houses in my area, with 2 more precincts (approx. 1600 homes) hopefully to get done by our primary in 13 days. After a precinct is done, they are followed up with a phone call. I also have plastered my metro area with 300 pole signs 7"x30" wide. I've burnt hundreds of DVD's and passed them out, left them at coffee shops and such.

 

I am hardly alone, there are hundreds of thousands of us calling, writing letters, canvassing, etc. throughout the country. People who would rather help with name recognition than sit there and vote for "the lesser of two evils" and assumptively blame others for a possibly worse than bad outcome come November; when in fact, they share part of the blame if the democraps get into office because instead of voting for who they agree with the most... they vote for a different piece of shit because of a perception effect caused by what the media is planting in most people's heads.

 

Also as I've stated before in various threads, this one included; McCain doesn't have the juice (money, character, plans, and policies) to beat either of the Democraps. Even If he was the only one running Sandi, he still won't win. He doesn't have the majority of backing from the RNC, Democraps won't jump over and support him based on his stated policies and plans (as Republicans are doing with Obama), Republicans are jumping ship either because they are disenfranchised with the party, or simply because they don't like McCain. The only support Hucklebee has are the religious folks. If that is their primary thing they are basing their vote on and they did their research, they'd back RP as well. Basing that on Hucklebee's radical religious endorsements given to him that he advertised as well as his voting record and other actions that clearly go against him being a truly spiritual person.

 

About you having no voice due to the date of your primary; I agree. I feel all the primaries should be on the same day for 24 hours. Open the polls at 12am est/9pm pst and run them for 24 hours. I feel as you stated, in late states primaries, those states get screwed. Another benefit of this plan is that unfortunately many people vote to be on a winning side. So I do believe that when the left side of the country people see that candidate abc is winning a right side of the country state, they're gonna vote for abc because they want to be on the winning side. Stoopid people. That's just like voting for something/someone based on how many lawn signs you see. I truly think if all the voting was at the same time for the entire country, it would eliminate the late voting "no voice" such as in your instance, as well as the media slanting the vote by reporting and people wanting to be on the winning side. A side note, in Wisconsin's primary last night, CNN was reporting McCain the winner WITH 0% REPORTING.

 

LOL, that's enough for now.. I'd imagine we shall continue this another time :)

 

 

I applaud what you have done. We need more like you out there. But when I'm talking about name recognition, I'm talking about TV. The media have chosen not to mention his name and without that, he can't win. Not trying to take the wind out of your sails. Just telling you how I see it after voting in so many elections and ending up being surprised at the stupidity of the majority of the voting public. It always irked me when libby's talked to us like we are idiots. Then I figured it out. Their voting base are idiots. No wonder they think we are.

I can only speak from the experiences I have had. If a third party candidate has never won an election (in recent history), I just don't understand why you think a right-in can. It simply comes down to the Democratic and Republican candidates. We now have a two party system. If you don't mind my saying so, maybe you could put some of your efforts into changing that. Spread the word. Sounds to me you are really good at that. I know you don't like the 'lesser of two evils' arguement but it's true. It really is. We aren't a but of slackers that don't care. We just know. What's that saying? The definition of insanity is doing the exact same thing over and over and expecting different results. We've beat our heads against the wall for so many years that we just know the outcome is a headache. At this point in time, we're screwed. It's all about damage repair now. All I ask is that you give some old geezers and an old broad a little credit for what we've learned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey damn it, I still have a primary to vote in, can we at least pretend like it is not over until then? Sadly, there is nothing "National" about our primary system. Combined with a 2 party system, it is a joke these days.

 

As for our Queen of the Pigs election this fall, it will be a very polarizing race and most of us will have to hold our noses. Old White guy POW versus a Young wet behind the ears Black guy.

 

Since this is a gun site first, one thing is for sure, guns are one of the single biggest crossover issues out there. Race and gender are even bigger even though it sounds ugly, it is what it is. So Democrat gun owners will cross over and vote McCain while younger Repubs/conservatives just right of center might cross over and vote Obama/youth.

 

The polls will be wrong no matter what they say and unless it looks like a landslide, it will be interesting.

 

In the past 20 years or so I have never heard anything good said about McCain from people I know who live in AZ. FYI I tend to only have friends who own guns, go figure? McCains votes do not always reflect what came out of his mouth before hand. He is no gun lover, just a "playa" who wants power.

 

So this Fall before you go to vote, put on your nose clip to help cut the smell and keep it from distracting you.

Edited by Zoub
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, pretending is all you can do now. Almost everyone has dropped out. Sucks eggs big time. Will I vote for who I want in the primaries? Hell yeah. But it's gonna be McCain on the ballot in November and at that point, I have no choice. You either vote for him or assure a Socialist will be leading this country.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I voted for Ron Paul in the Wisconsin primary. Will he win, probably not. However, a Ron Paul defeat doesn't mean the end of it. Liberty and the security of our rights is the idea. Ron Paul is only the vehicle that brought the idea to a public who is finally beginning to listen. Let the idea die with a Ron Paul defeat, or give up even before that, and you guarantee that it will not change.

 

As for this election: When you believe you have choice A or choice B, both having the stamp of approval of the government, then you acknowledge giving the government that power to dictate what choices you have. Racegal you have it right, the system is too fargone and the majority of people either don't care enough or don't think they have the power to change anything. I only see massive change happening one way. "When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty." Thomas Jefferson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya know, we might actually have a chance for this. I just heard this morning that Nader is thinking of running. He takes the liberal votes away. And Shillery has been shown as losing to McCain. If she get the nomination, and Paul runs, there really could be a chance. But you supporters really need to get out there and spread the word. And I mean contacting the MSM. His name needs to be on TV and NPR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't care who you vote for but for GOD'S SAKE, it's a primary. At least in this fucking election you should vote for the person you WANT to represent you not the fucker who has the best chance of beating the candidate on the other side.

 

The reason democracy (Republic really) is broken in America is that people vote for who they think will WIN not who they actually agree with and who actually represents their ideas.

 

IF YOU VOTED FOR SOMEONE BECAUSE YOU THINK THEY CAN BEAT OBAMA BUT YOU DON'T AGREE WITH THEIR CORE PRINCIPLES THEN PLEASE, NEXT TIME DON'T VOTE. YOU'RE TELLING THE POLITICIANS THAT YOU AGREE WITH SOMEONE YOU DON'T AGREE WITH.

 

Guess what that means, they all start swinging that way to get your vote. If you want a conservative, vote fucking conservative, not RINO because they can possibly beat the antichrist candidates.

 

Fuck you all who don't vote your conscience. You gave us McCain as the lead Rep Candidate. I don't want to hear any of you bitching when he does 9 things you disagree with to the one thing you do agree with.

 

If you want Hunter, Vote Hunter. Thompson? Vote Thompson. What's the worst that could happen in a fucking primary if you voted for who you really fucking wanted to represent you? I tell you what's the worst, you get McCain or Gulliani.... well guess what.... you got what you wanted. Assholes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Chatbox

    Load More
    You don't have permission to chat.
×
×
  • Create New...