Jump to content

7.62x.39 is a P.O.S-I'm pissed!


Recommended Posts

Hello

I purchased a 7.62x.39 Saiga 16" about four months ago (maybe longer) and the POS is still unshootable. I've spent more time on it than any of my conversions, more $$$ that any except my S12's, and I'm really aggravated that I bought the lump of feces.

I got it 'cause I have a buttload of AK mag's and ammo, which were purchased for my Red Jacket AK pistol. I figured I'd go ahead and get a rifle, since I had a spare IOR scope and mount, and more ammo than I'd ever shoot through my pistol.

Well, the worthless piece of shit hasn't cycled two rounds in a row yet. The bolt slides over the end of the fresh cartridge, gouges the shell and wedges the round between the bolt and the breech.

I thought it might be the fact that I screwed up and trimmed too much off the mag catch and the mag's were sitting too low in the receiver. So, I ordered a new catch and pin from K-Var and installed it today (kind of a PIA in itself...) and trimmed it by microns with the flat side of a dremmel wheel until one of the four different mag's I had on the bench would lock in, and then, only if I forced the catch home with my finger. The other three mag's (all four are new, or virtually so) wouldn't even lock in yet. Not a bit of play in the mag, and the same lame horse shit with the failure to pick up a new round. Trimmed a hair more off so the other three would lock in, same shit So, I'm pretty well convinced that the problem is some vodka-soaked assembly issues....(not me!) Apparently, the bolt guide is just too high, or the mag seats are too low.

What really sucks is this POS is already converted, with Dinzag-supplied muzzle-threading and crowning, etc.

I have a feeling I'm pretty much SOL with RAA since I've pretty much altered the hell outa it.

 

Anybody have a similar experience with a fully converted Saiga?

I guess my only recourse is to cross my fingers and roll the dice with a replacement, and swap what can be swapped, re-do what I have to re-do (like the muzzle threading/crowning) and hope tha same sorry SOB didn't work on the next one I buy.

 

I was never really enthusiastic about the .39 load (I got into Saiga's 'cause they made .308 AK's) and this BS has really soured me.

I know I could get Surefire mag's or whatever and forego the guide/mag catch mod's, but the reason I went this route was to utilize the 50 or so mag's (and Norinco drums) that I already have.

 

Vent OFF

 

One good reason to shoot 'yer stuff before you modify it, I reckon.....

 

guido2 in Houston

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since your gun is such a POS and I just happened to find $50 in the parking lot of my shop today and I'm feeling generous I'll give you $50 for it.

 

whaddya say? I'll even pay for shipping out of the goodness of my heart.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jeez.....guys....read the post. It picks up the first round just fine but either short strokes the bolt or the bolt runs over the top of the next round in the mag. He has the mag up as far as it will go and the bolt still misses the back of the case head.

 

It needs more gas (if its short stroking) or the rails are shot into the receiver too high compared to the bore position. That can be fixed by welding the bolt carrier to hold the bolt lower when it is extended forward in the carrier picking up the shell from the magazine.

 

Tony

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same problem on a Yugo M70. The rails inside the reciever that the bolt rides on were not installed correctly(too high). It would not cycled by hand either. My 2 cent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

Thanks for all the help and opinions. As 1911 mentioned, I posted this problem a few weeks ago and included pic's of the wedged bullet and the Dinzag engineered bullet guide in place. I'm confident the Dinzag guide would work flawlessly, if I could just get a round to that point in the process.

As Tony and Norty mentioned, I believe the rails are simply at the wrong elevation in respect to where the mag seats. It won't even strip the first round out of a mag by hand cycling. It hasn't yet gotten to the point of the feed ramp or gas blowback being an issue. It will only fire a round that is inserted by hand. That is with any of three different ammo manufacturers, and handloads as well, and four different types of new magazines.

I'm afraid this one is truly not worth any more time and trouble on.

Once again, may be worth it to test these buggers out prior to spending $$$ and time converting them.

 

Anyone know if a standard AK bolt is fitted to these?

 

Respectfully posted,

 

guido2 in Houston

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

Guess I'll make this a "parts gun" (like I needed one of those...)

-Main point of this post is.....

 

"Sometimes quality control......Isn't!"

 

Make sure the factory has done their part prior to you doing yours.

 

Even if Master Molder or Surefire mag's had it functioning, it would defeat the purpose, for me. I'm trying to utilize the mag's and drums I already have. Having two similar rifles that each require specific mag's would not be very beneficial, either.

 

Sigh....Wonder how long the waiting list is for the Dinzag die and crowning tool?

 

Respectfully posted,

guido2 in Houston

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just out of curiousity, why did you buy 50 mags and several drums for a single AK pistol?

 

Well, when it comes to ammo and mag's, my philosophy is "Enough is Never Enough!"

 

Anyway, I got the mag's at very good prices when different retailers were closing 'em out a couple or so years ago. That was well prior to the "Hi-Cap Hysteria" that we're seeing now.

And, as far as the Norinco drums, I only have one of each (75# & 100#) and those are pretty much "get 'em when you can" items.

 

I have maybe 35-40 hi-cap AK mag's, the rest are 10's and 20's for bench firing.

 

I guess I don't really have a valid reason.....

 

Respectfully posted,

guido2 in Houston

Link to post
Share on other sites

Respectfully, Guido2, none of the mags you've listed are "high capacity", but rather "standard capacity".

 

All of the capacities you've listed have been issued for decades by the various militaries.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Respectfully, Guido2, none of the mags you've listed are "high capacity", but rather "standard capacity".

 

All of the capacities you've listed have been issued for decades by the various militaries.

Well hell, that's sure to cheer guido up, 'cuz it's not like he's pissed off enough about his weapon. :rolleyes:

Besides, isn't that relevant to state laws anyway? Because a standard 30rd mag for any weapon is absolutely a hi-cap mag in NJ. Actually, anything over 15 is hi-cap over here.

 

Guido, sorry to hear about your problems but thanks for giving some of us the heads up. The 7.62x39 is my next purchase and one that I will convert...unless I convert the .308 first.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Besides, isn't that relevant to state laws anyway? Because a standard 30rd mag for any weapon is absolutely a hi-cap mag in NJ. Actually, anything over 15 is hi-cap over here.

Buying a skunk and calling it your pet cat doesn't make it smell any different.

 

The term "high capacity" was coined by the Brady bunch to put the onus of evil on anyone who uses them.

 

Evil intent is not in the object, but the person wielding it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Respectfully, Guido2, none of the mags you've listed are "high capacity", but rather "standard capacity".

 

All of the capacities you've listed have been issued for decades by the various militaries.

 

Hello, nalioth

Well, if you're talking about those ridiculous-looking 50 and 75 round stick mag's, no, I don't have any of those.

The "standard" 30 round, and occasional 40 round mag's I was referring to are hi-cap per the recent AWB, and the looming resurgence of said AWB/"Hi-Cap" mag ban was the context from which I was speaking. Those mag's are becoming increasingly difficult to obtain, thanks to our bud "Hussein" Obama.

 

Although, I don't believe I even listed any capacities for any mag's other than the "bench" mag's in my original post....

 

Respectfully as well....

guido2 in Houston

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on what you consider high-cap. Laws consider 30 rounds to be high-cap, and to be honest, i think just because high-cap is standard in military use doesn't mean it's standard cap.

 

So IMO that's just nitpicking, guido wasn't incorrect or anything, though i wouldnt call military mags high-cap, that sounds too commercial for my taste. Besides, if 75 and 100 round drums still aren't high-cap enough for you nalioth, something's wrong :P

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello

I purchased a 7.62x.39 Saiga 16" about four months ago (maybe longer) and the POS is still unshootable. I've spent more time on it than any of my conversions, more $$$ that any except my S12's, and I'm really aggravated that I bought the lump of feces.

I got it 'cause I have a buttload of AK mag's and ammo, which were purchased for my Red Jacket AK pistol. I figured I'd go ahead and get a rifle, since I had a spare IOR scope and mount, and more ammo than I'd ever shoot through my pistol.

Well, the worthless piece of shit hasn't cycled two rounds in a row yet. The bolt slides over the end of the fresh cartridge, gouges the shell and wedges the round between the bolt and the breech.

I thought it might be the fact that I screwed up and trimmed too much off the mag catch and the mag's were sitting too low in the receiver. So, I ordered a new catch and pin from K-Var and installed it today (kind of a PIA in itself...) and trimmed it by microns with the flat side of a dremmel wheel until one of the four different mag's I had on the bench would lock in, and then, only if I forced the catch home with my finger. The other three mag's (all four are new, or virtually so) wouldn't even lock in yet. Not a bit of play in the mag, and the same lame horse shit with the failure to pick up a new round. Trimmed a hair more off so the other three would lock in, same shit So, I'm pretty well convinced that the problem is some vodka-soaked assembly issues....(not me!) Apparently, the bolt guide is just too high, or the mag seats are too low.

What really sucks is this POS is already converted, with Dinzag-supplied muzzle-threading and crowning, etc.

I have a feeling I'm pretty much SOL with RAA since I've pretty much altered the hell outa it.

 

Anybody have a similar experience with a fully converted Saiga?

I guess my only recourse is to cross my fingers and roll the dice with a replacement, and swap what can be swapped, re-do what I have to re-do (like the muzzle threading/crowning) and hope tha same sorry SOB didn't work on the next one I buy.

 

I was never really enthusiastic about the .39 load (I got into Saiga's 'cause they made .308 AK's) and this BS has really soured me.

I know I could get Surefire mag's or whatever and forego the guide/mag catch mod's, but the reason I went this route was to utilize the 50 or so mag's (and Norinco drums) that I already have.

 

Vent OFF

 

One good reason to shoot 'yer stuff before you modify it, I reckon.....

 

guido2 in Houston

 

 

Does the serial number on the bolt carriage match the gun's number, I had a customer buy both a 223 and a x39, she showed up at the shop with a story of sadness, say her gun worked great the first time out but never again. then she describe the same thing as you experienced.

it turned out she cleaned both guns at the same time and put the 223 bolt carriage in the x39.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello

I purchased a 7.62x.39 Saiga 16" about four months ago (maybe longer) and the POS is still unshootable. I've spent more time on it than any of my conversions, more $$$ that any except my S12's, and I'm really aggravated that I bought the lump of feces.

I got it 'cause I have a buttload of AK mag's and ammo, which were purchased for my Red Jacket AK pistol. I figured I'd go ahead and get a rifle, since I had a spare IOR scope and mount, and more ammo than I'd ever shoot through my pistol.

Well, the worthless piece of shit hasn't cycled two rounds in a row yet. The bolt slides over the end of the fresh cartridge, gouges the shell and wedges the round between the bolt and the breech.

I thought it might be the fact that I screwed up and trimmed too much off the mag catch and the mag's were sitting too low in the receiver. So, I ordered a new catch and pin from K-Var and installed it today (kind of a PIA in itself...) and trimmed it by microns with the flat side of a dremmel wheel until one of the four different mag's I had on the bench would lock in, and then, only if I forced the catch home with my finger. The other three mag's (all four are new, or virtually so) wouldn't even lock in yet. Not a bit of play in the mag, and the same lame horse shit with the failure to pick up a new round. Trimmed a hair more off so the other three would lock in, same shit So, I'm pretty well convinced that the problem is some vodka-soaked assembly issues....(not me!) Apparently, the bolt guide is just too high, or the mag seats are too low.

What really sucks is this POS is already converted, with Dinzag-supplied muzzle-threading and crowning, etc.

I have a feeling I'm pretty much SOL with RAA since I've pretty much altered the hell outa it.

 

Anybody have a similar experience with a fully converted Saiga?

I guess my only recourse is to cross my fingers and roll the dice with a replacement, and swap what can be swapped, re-do what I have to re-do (like the muzzle threading/crowning) and hope tha same sorry SOB didn't work on the next one I buy.

 

I was never really enthusiastic about the .39 load (I got into Saiga's 'cause they made .308 AK's) and this BS has really soured me.

I know I could get Surefire mag's or whatever and forego the guide/mag catch mod's, but the reason I went this route was to utilize the 50 or so mag's (and Norinco drums) that I already have.

 

Vent OFF

 

One good reason to shoot 'yer stuff before you modify it, I reckon.....

 

guido2 in Houston

 

 

Does the serial number on the bolt carriage match the gun's number, I had a customer buy both a 223 and a x39, she showed up at the shop with a story of sadness, say her gun worked great the first time out but never again. then she describe the same thing as you experienced.

it turned out she cleaned both guns at the same time and put the 223 bolt carriage in the x39.

 

Good idea, Leo

I don't have a .223, but it certainly could have happened at the factory. The more I think about it, for the bolt to properly index with the breech, it seems that the problem would have to be height of inserted mag (mag seating surface too low) or the bolt diameter too small. If the bolt itself were mounted too high, it seems it would not mesh with the breech....Make any sense?

-I will check numbers tomorrow.

 

Thanks,

guido2 in Houston

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Chatbox

    Load More
    You don't have permission to chat.
×
×
  • Create New...