derekmclv 39 Posted February 2, 2011 Report Share Posted February 2, 2011 (edited) Since we are all having to wait so "patiently" I thought I'd finally put together a quick poll regardng the pending double-stack mags. So here goes: 1. After all this waiting and build-up, just how disapointed would you be if the largest capacity magazine is just a 14 round capacity (just 2 more than than the SureFire/SGM brand)? 2. What's the minumum capacity you'd be happy with? 3. What's the maximum capacity that you think we will see? Please format your responses 1, 2, and 3. Thanks. Edited February 2, 2011 by ShottyOne 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
A Refined Approach 0 Posted February 2, 2011 Report Share Posted February 2, 2011 Great questions, thanks. 1. I'd be very disappointed 2. 16 3. 22 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
22_Shooter 1,560 Posted February 2, 2011 Report Share Posted February 2, 2011 Since we are all having to wait so "patiently" I thought I'd finally put together a quick poll regardng the pending double-stack mags. So here goes: 1. After all this waiting and build-up, just how disapointed would you be if the largest capacity magazine is just a 14 round capacity (just 2 more than than the SureFire/SGM brand)? 2. What's the minumum capacity you'd be happy with? 3. What's the maximum capacity that you think we will see? Please format your responses 1, 2, and 3. Thanks. There's an option to make an actual poll when you're starting a thread, ya know. 1) But anyway.....I won't speak for anyone else, but I personally would not be disappointed with a 14 round double-stack. Sure, it's only 2 more than you can already get in another brand's mag. But, those mags are single stack, and with that capacity, you've got a mag the size of a horse cock hanging below your gun. Which is partially why I never bought one of them. I'd be all over a mag that holds 14 rounds, and could retain a smaller profile. 2) Minimum: 8 3) Maximum: No idea. I'm sure Mike knows what's workable, and what's not. I'll trust his judgment. Like I said, I'm not looking for a super high capacity mag. I just want a good size capacity, coupled with a smaller profile than a single-stack. YMMV 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
slostang 80 Posted February 2, 2011 Report Share Posted February 2, 2011 I'm sure theres a 20rd mag in the works. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lbsrdi 1,078 Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 1. Not disappointed. 2. 10 3. 20 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
valleyrat 2 Posted February 27, 2011 Report Share Posted February 27, 2011 10 round. Just do it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
evlblkwpnz 3,418 Posted February 28, 2011 Report Share Posted February 28, 2011 1- 14 is fine as long as it is compact 2- 8 rounds in a 5 round factory sized mag would be perfection 3- 20 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
KC913 324 Posted February 28, 2011 Report Share Posted February 28, 2011 Since we are all having to wait so "patiently" I thought I'd finally put together a quick poll regardng the pending double-stack mags. So here goes: 1. After all this waiting and build-up, just how disapointed would you be if the largest capacity magazine is just a 14 round capacity (just 2 more than than the SureFire/SGM brand)? 2. What's the minumum capacity you'd be happy with? 3. What's the maximum capacity that you think we will see? Please format your responses 1, 2, and 3. Thanks. 1 - I'll be happy with whatever capacity it holds if Mike makes at least one that is roughly the length of a factory 8 round mag. 2 - 10 3 - 16 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
22_Shooter 1,560 Posted March 11, 2011 Report Share Posted March 11, 2011 Looks like you don't have to guess on the capacities anymore: http://forum.saiga-12.com/index.php?/topic/44279-double-stack-12ga-magazine-for-saiga-12/page__view__findpost__p__616560 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.