Wishoot 1 Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 My 7.62 will be wearing one of these soon. Does one hold an advantage over the other? I appreciate your thoughts and comments. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wishoot 1 Posted April 20, 2011 Author Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 Anyone? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jimdigriz 580 Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 (edited) Anyone? I had the Krebs, but ultimately went back to stock because I think it's a better combat sight (though obviously not better in terms of bench rest shooting precision). I don't have experience with the Mojo, but if I had to pick between them, I'd go with the Krebs for simplicity, and for retaining the yardage (meterage?) indicators of the original sight leaf. Edited April 20, 2011 by Jim Digriz Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rob-cubed 74 Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 Kreb's. It retains the original AK ladder adjustment feature, the rear is simply changed from a notch to a peep. In a round like the 7.62 which drops quickly you really want to have the ability to compensate for elevation. I have an original Mojo (not the microclick) and it's a decent sight, the one advantage is windage adjustment which Kreb's does not have. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PTGT_Neon 1 Posted May 2, 2011 Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 I picked Krebs for simplicity. I don't have experience with the mojo. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NM0 586 Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 I decided to give the Mojo a try. The sight picture is extremely better. I don't lose the front sight post behind the blade anymore. It is smaller than original blade, well made and easy to install. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sunset_Va 2 Posted January 14, 2012 Report Share Posted January 14, 2012 I have a Mojo standard sight on my Saiga 308, and really like it. Also have the TWS sight system (aperture) on my Saiga 223, and like that better than the Mojo. The aperture opening on the Mojo is much larger than the TWS peep. I moved the TWS way forward on the rail, in order to just see the front sight post only and not the sight wings. I vote for Mojo... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
netpackrat 566 Posted February 1, 2012 Report Share Posted February 1, 2012 I've used the Mojos on several of my rifles at one time or another and I like them a lot. I specifically went with them over the Krebs due to the adjustability. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
liberty -r- death 1,445 Posted February 20, 2012 Report Share Posted February 20, 2012 I use Krebs. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
yakdung 2,926 Posted February 20, 2012 Report Share Posted February 20, 2012 (edited) I'm running a Mojo on my SAR3. Like it better than the blade. Yakdung Edited February 20, 2012 by yakdung Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guns Are Great 140 Posted March 28, 2012 Report Share Posted March 28, 2012 Mojo micro click is a great site! especially, if your front site is canted alittle. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Roger Roger 2 Posted April 6, 2012 Report Share Posted April 6, 2012 My buddy has a Krebs and a Mojo. I tried both of his and find I like the Krebs better so I just got one of those. I find it easier to use, retains factory controls, sight picture was better for me. The Krebs sight just works best for me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.