Jump to content

Recommended Posts

GUYS,

"A Manhattan Supreme Court Justice ruled Thursday that the City of New York has no legal duty to protect citizens, even if armed police officers are nearby, see a violent crime in progress, and choose to hide in order to save their own skins instead of responding, The Gothamist reported late last week."

 

THIS IS WHAT'S KNOWN AS YOYO.

 

YOU'RE ON YOUR OWN.........

JESS1344

Click here: Ruling on subway stabbing victim highlights ‘gun control’ Catch-22 - National gun rights | Examiner.com

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The SCOTUS has ruled that way, as have several state supreme courts.

 

Warren v District of Columbia

Castle Rock v. Gonzales, No. 04-27 SCOTUS

 

A quick search online will pull up several involving the police and several moer involving other government agencies.

 

The government at all levels have removed themselves from responsibility for their actions or inaction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be a bit much to put on a car door:

"To Serve and Protect"*

 

*mostly ourselves and our union brothers and sisters

but we might help you out if it's not too much trouble or as long as we won't get hurt.

 

 

I know most cops are good people doing a dirty dangerous thankless job but some times in some events some of their fellow officers just seem kind of pathetic.

Edited by the 4th Doctor
Link to post
Share on other sites

The SCOTUS has ruled that way, as have several state supreme courts.

 

Warren v District of Columbia

Castle Rock v. Gonzales, No. 04-27 SCOTUS

 

A quick search online will pull up several involving the police and several moer involving other government agencies.

 

The government at all levels have removed themselves from responsibility for their actions or inaction.

 

Yep and from what I recall, pretty much every state has a similar case saying the same thing for state constitutions. The upshot is that we made a social contract a while back and it apparently works like a cell phone contract. You are locked in, but they get to change their side of the terms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

idk about you, but I assert myself when a company decides to change its contract.

 

I also think I should be able to do my customer service job with an ak on my back. lol

 

Congratulations. You are the only person who does so. The rest of us realized a long time ago that similar contracts of adhesion are impossible to evade, because all of the rival companies do the same thing, and all of them change some terms with every single billing cycle, and this would require you to negotiate with them every month, and win. They have no incentive to let anyone win.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's well known by the informed that police are not resonsible for protecting you. It's funny that this fact and court rulings are not a huge part of the gun rights fight. There are many cops out there that will take a bullet for you. But since I don't know if THAT cop will be around or if cops in general will even show up in time, I choose to carry.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Chatbox

    Load More
    You don't have permission to chat.
×
×
  • Create New...