Dad2142Dad 6,559 Posted July 20, 2015 Report Share Posted July 20, 2015 Obama looks to ban Social Security recipients from owning guns http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/07/19/obama-looks-to-ban-social-security-recipients-from-owning-guns/ Amazing, but not unexpected. Gives SS an historic meaning............. 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sobrenegade 795 Posted July 20, 2015 Report Share Posted July 20, 2015 An even simpler idea would be to prohibit anyone with a vowel or consonant in their name, or born within the first twelve months. JEEZ, why keep fucking around? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Good Looking Ugly Guy 12 Posted July 20, 2015 Report Share Posted July 20, 2015 If the article I read was 100% correct. it sounds more like social security disability, who have a payee ie: developmentally disabled and other people who have been deemed to lack the responsibility to manage their own affairs. Although I would like to go thru the one single law that this pertains to though 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sobrenegade 795 Posted July 20, 2015 Report Share Posted July 20, 2015 If the article I read was 100% correct. it sounds more like social security disability, who have a payee ie: developmentally disabled and other people who have been deemed to lack the responsibility to manage their own affairs. Although I would like to go thru the one single law that this pertains to thoughOh yeah, how about if you have FICA taxes taken out by your employer. Since you are having someone else pay your portion, from your funds, that would constitute lacking the responsibility to manage your own affairs. Self employed are not exempt. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
HB of CJ 1,263 Posted July 20, 2015 Report Share Posted July 20, 2015 And people, do we still have over one year to go? HB Quote Link to post Share on other sites
forsaken352 235 Posted July 20, 2015 Report Share Posted July 20, 2015 And people, do we still have over one year to go? HB http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?p0=263&iso=20170120T00&msg=Time%20left%20until%20Obama%20leaves%20office%22 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SHOTGUN MESIAH 855 Posted July 20, 2015 Report Share Posted July 20, 2015 Because we all know how many old senile, alzheimers ,dementia, SS recipients commit mass shootings/ murder with a gun…… WTF Once again they target the innocent people who have absolutely nothing to do with any of theses crimes. This is what we can look forward to seeing from now on. Feel-good laws that do absolutely nothing to address the real issues. This is only the beginning. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ktcm7271 999 Posted July 20, 2015 Report Share Posted July 20, 2015 The elderly and disabled are a terror threat and must be disarmed! Jeez, the shit this prez comes up with. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wolverine 10,360 Posted July 20, 2015 Report Share Posted July 20, 2015 It's about taking as many guns from as many people as possible. Wait, Obama is not done. When he is done with the disabled he will target the next group until he can make a felon out of every gun owner or force them to give up their guns. It's just a continuation of the liberal ideology that guns are evil and that society would be much safer when all the guns are gone. Even the military cannot protect themselves in recruiting centers and on base. It's ridiculous. But I am not shocked given the general direction of our nation. It just makes me sick to my stomach when I view it all in totality. I can't wait for Obama to go. Let's hope Hillary or Sanders does not replace him or the storm will continue. 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spartacus 1,619 Posted July 20, 2015 Report Share Posted July 20, 2015 >>It's about taking as many guns from as many people as possible. Yep. They want to keep finding small groups of people they can disarm. Small groups so that it will not raise alarm bells of the masses. Then when they finally drop the big ban hammer, there will be far fewer armed insurgents to deal with. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JESS1344 508 Posted July 20, 2015 Report Share Posted July 20, 2015 GUYS, WHAT WAS THAT GERMAN PASTOR'S NAME; NIEMOLLER?? JESS1344 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sim_Player 1,939 Posted July 20, 2015 Report Share Posted July 20, 2015 It just shows how desperate they are to add a "win" to Obama's cheap legacy. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NM0 586 Posted July 20, 2015 Report Share Posted July 20, 2015 Just more continual legal banning till the few who will still have them are dangerous enough for general safety actions. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jpnrm96 70 Posted July 20, 2015 Report Share Posted July 20, 2015 I really think this pres is fracking nuts. He wont even look you in the eye while he sticks the knife in. So I guess that since I draw my ssdi, and want to travel I would have to appoint my sister as designated payee to handle my finances. Using that scenario I would qualify to be tossed into the category that strips my gun rights WITHOUT due process. HMMMM....... The next question will be, when will this poser try and implement an old German program named Aktion T4. This program first focused on children and then adults to eliminate "Lebensunwertes Leben" (lives unworthy of life. Seems like the last 7 years could be compared to 20s,30s,40s Germany. I've got my representatives on speed dial. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JESS1344 508 Posted July 20, 2015 Report Share Posted July 20, 2015 GUYS, ONE WONDERS HOW LONG IT WILL BE BEFORE THE GESTAPO STARTS INVOLUNTARILY ASSIGNING THESE "REPRESENTATIVE PAYEES" TO SOCIAL SECURITY RECIPIENTS, EH? "OH, MEET YOUR "REPRESENTATIVE", NOW HAND OVER YOUR GUNS"! DON'T LAUGH.............. JESS1344 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
read_the_wall 614 Posted July 21, 2015 Report Share Posted July 21, 2015 It will not end until a " call to arms " is answered and the end result is 536 swingers in front of the rainbow house opps,,,did I just say that out loud ? probably on another stupid list 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
G O B 3,516 Posted July 21, 2015 Report Share Posted July 21, 2015 The most recent poll puts the number of Texans that would vote for secession at 60%. Include me in that group. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wolverine 10,360 Posted July 21, 2015 Report Share Posted July 21, 2015 The Social Security Administration makes a independent judgment about who is mentally diminished and/or ill and unable to conduct their own financial affairs. With one broad brush the Obama Administration would ban 4.2 million people from owning firearms regardless of actual abilities and circumstances. Many would either have to lose their guns or join the ranks of felons if Obama can make this happen. It doesn't leave a good taste in my mouth despite the fact that some are not competent to own firearms. It smacks of condemning all for the sake of netting some. It is counter to our justice system of being not guilty until proven otherwise. All are guilty and seem to have no redress with this proposed action. But what else should we expect from the Obama Administration. After all, the goal is to get all the guns possible until no one can can legally own one like in other countries. Inch by inch we are losing our freedoms rooted in the history of our country. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
thebuns1 4,323 Posted July 21, 2015 Report Share Posted July 21, 2015 It's only going to continue. This is just scratching the surface of the bigger picture of things to come. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
storm6490 2,768 Posted July 21, 2015 Report Share Posted July 21, 2015 I've always wanted to opt out of social security as it's just a pyramid scheme that is about to tumble. The ones that paid into it should be able to opt out and pull all investments from the fund. Fuck that guy, he can't do it anyway. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spartacus 1,619 Posted July 21, 2015 Report Share Posted July 21, 2015 They'll probably announce that everybody who paid into Social Security will get their money back with interest about the same time we go into hyper-inflation and the dollar is worthless. The 8 million dollars for a loaf of bread kind of thing. They will make all of those payments in worthless currency, and maybe you will be free to take the payment in whatever the next fiat currency is at their dictated conversion rate. Fraction of a penny on the dollar if we are lucky. All on the condition that you take a mark (RFID?) on your right hand or forehead tied to your bank account "to prevent fraud". 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dad2142Dad 6,559 Posted July 24, 2015 Author Report Share Posted July 24, 2015 The Social Security Administration makes a independent judgment about who is mentally diminished and/or ill and unable to conduct their own financial affairs. ^^^ that right there is the problem. No government agency should be allowed to judge compentency, they don't know what is........ 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sobrenegade 795 Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 Seems like another old adage applies here. "The pot calling the kettle black". An incompetent judging myself or someone else incompetent. That's rich. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
G O B 3,516 Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 This Grumpy Old Bastard will KEEP his guns until he is no longer competent - competent to deliver them piece by piece, Starting with the projectile portions of my ammo. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sobrenegade 795 Posted July 25, 2015 Report Share Posted July 25, 2015 If I am not mistaken, any SS moneys paid to me were mine to begin with since I was by law forced to have them taken from my paychecks. Not that I minded at the time, as I was constantly being told by the then older workers, it was my way of being comfortable when the time came to leave the work force. As the years went by, the taxes increased and stories of retirees on SS subsisting on cat food because they couldn't afford tuna were commonplace. People not even eating at times because they had to choose between medicines they needed for staying alive or food to keep them alive. It was then I realized SS was not all it was supposed to be. So, I for one am not being handed anything from the government except monies owed me anyways that were taken without my permission. If they had invested those funds wisely (when does the government do anything wisely) and separately instead of using them for a cure all on schemes/projects having nothing associated with retirement, perhaps this subject wouldn't be discussed now. Hindsight. Where would the govt. get the money to pay back that which has been mismanaged or stolen? I like to say let's start at the salaries and retirement benefits of those that were elected to serve us. They built themselves a nice comfortable empire. We will never see the monies repaid and I will not willingly relinquish any material want I have accumulated without fighting for it as I have had to do through out my still working career. One good thing about being closer to death with my age factor, I, increasingly give less of a fuck than I did yesterday. I am by no means Uncle Sam's lean, mean fighting machine, but my brother once told me if someone pushes you, don't push them back, hit them. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.