horatio 515 Posted September 26, 2015 Report Share Posted September 26, 2015 I was surfing yahoo and saw the article. Judge orders the families who started the lawsuit against luckygunner, through the brady campaign, to pay over 200k to them. Obviously they disagree. Thought the article was pretty good if not obnoxious at a few points. It was posted a couple hours ago and I didn't see anything here. I'm surfing on a phone and don't know how to post a link. It did continue the story on the huffington post. Hopefully one of our more tech savvy fellows can link it for me. Haven't posted much guys but I do lurk. Kinda got some big things going on right now and just can't. But wanted to let y'all know what I found. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DLT 1,646 Posted September 26, 2015 Report Share Posted September 26, 2015 I read about this via a posting on facebook. The liberals a upset. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
G O B 3,516 Posted September 26, 2015 Report Share Posted September 26, 2015 Start a frivilous lawsuit and cry that they have to pay legal fees when they lose? Brady bunch is good at telling people how much money they will win, but do not tell they will not pay up when their baseless suits fail! Now the family that lost a kid will lose 200,000 dollars because they are greedy AND stupid! 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
horatio 515 Posted September 26, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 26, 2015 Thanks guys. Longshot had posted a link to a similar article earlier today but it seems to be gone now. Strange Regardless, the article longshot posted was from a gun site. It was well balanced and informative. The one I read contained the same basic information but was a long wailing dissertation on why armor piercing bullets kill people worse and why now one should be able to own a rifle that can shoot more than three bullets in a "clip" My Sunday is somewhat free. It was on huffington post. I guess I'm off to YouTube to learn how to create a link on an iPhone. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Long Shot 1,287 Posted September 26, 2015 Report Share Posted September 26, 2015 Thanks guys. Longshot had posted a link to a similar article earlier today but it seems to be gone now. Strange Regardless, the article longshot posted was from a gun site. It was well balanced and informative. The one I read contained the same basic information but was a long wailing dissertation on why armor piercing bullets kill people worse and why now one should be able to own a rifle that can shoot more than three bullets in a "clip" My Sunday is somewhat free. It was on huffington post. I guess I'm off to YouTube to learn how to create a link on an iPhone. Not gone, it's on the thread you posted yesterday. http://forum.saiga-12.com/index.php?/topic/97834-judge-orders-brady-campaign-and-friends-to-pay-200000-in-legal-fees/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
HB of CJ 1,263 Posted September 27, 2015 Report Share Posted September 27, 2015 That you also. I was wondering where my answer went. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
storm6490 2,768 Posted September 28, 2015 Report Share Posted September 28, 2015 Good news! Thanks! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gunfun 3,931 Posted September 28, 2015 Report Share Posted September 28, 2015 better to read the actual opinion anyway. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1514432616782634090&q=Phillips+v.+Lucky+Gunner&hl=en&as_sdt=6,44&as_vis=1 Here is a write up by non-yahoos from a while back: http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2015/04/robert-farago/lucky-gunner-et-al-ask-for-court-costs-for-aurora-shooting-lawsuit/ One way to tell they aren't idiots is that they actually link back to the primary source documents, rather than just give you their spin. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.