Jump to content

Recommended Posts

According to the federalistpapers.org Obama is bringing in a UN backed police force to patrol cities in the US. We need more research to verify this action, but things are about to really "change" if this is in fact true.

Breitbart confirms this information.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/02/obama-administration-and-un-announce-global-police-force-to-fight-extremism-in-u-s/

 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/02/obama-administration-and-un-announce-global-police-force-to-fight-extremism-in-u-s/

Obama Administration and UN Announce Global Police Force to Fight ‘Extremism’ In U.S.

Vice President Joe Biden and U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch attend the 'Leader's Summit on Countering ISIL and Countering Violent Extremism' at the United Nations Headquarters, on September 29, 2015 in New York City. The Summit, hosted by Obama, addressed national, regional and global initiatives to counter ISIL and the spread of violent extremism. (Photo by )
Anthony Behar-Pool/Getty Images

by Pamela Geller2 Oct 201517,360
On Wednesday, Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced at the United Nations that her office would be working in several American cities to form what she called the Strong Cities Network (SCN), a law enforcement initiative that would encompass the globe.

This amounts to nothing less than the overriding of American laws, up to and including the United States Constitution, in favor of United Nations laws that would henceforth be implemented in the United States itself – without any consultation of Congress at all.

The United Nations is a sharia-compliant world body, and Obama, speaking there just days ago, insisted that “violent extremism” is not exclusive to Islam (which it is). Obama is redefining jihad terror to include everyone but the jihadists. So will the UN, driven largely by the sharia-enforcing Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the pro-Islamic post-American President Obama, use a “global police force” to crush counter-jihad forces?

After all, with Obama knowingly aiding al-Qaeda forces in Syria, how likely is it that he will use his “global police force” against actual Islamic jihadists? I suspect that instead, this global police force will be used to impose the blasphemy laws under the sharia (Islamic law), and to silence all criticism of Islam for the President who proclaimed that “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”

What is a global police force doing in our cities? This is exactly the abdication of American sovereignty that I warned about in my book, The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America. The Obama Department of Justice made it clear that it was exactly that when it distributed a press release last week announcing the “Launch of Strong Cities Network to Strengthen Community Resilience Against Violent Extremism.” In that press release, the DoJ complained that “while many cities and local authorities are developing innovative responses to address this challenge, no systematic efforts are in place to share experiences, pool resources and build a community of cities to inspire local action on a global scale.”

So if the local and municipal effort to counter the euphemistic and disingenuous “violent extremism” is inadequate and hasn’t developed “systematic efforts are in place to share experiences, pool resources and build a community of cities to inspire local action on a global scale,” the feds – and the UN – have to step in. Thus the groundwork is being laid for federal and international interference down to the local level. “The Strong Cities Network,” Lynch declared, “will serve as a vital tool to strengthen capacity-building and improve collaboration” – i.e., local dependence on federal and international authorities.

Lynch made the global (that is, United Nations) involvement clear when she added: “As we continue to counter a range of domestic and global terror threats, this innovative platform will enable cities to learn from one another, to develop best practices and to build social cohesion and community resilience here at home and around the world.”

This internationalist character was brought to the fore by the fact that the Strong Cities Network was launched on September 29 not at the White House or the Department of Homeland Security, or at the FBI headquarters or anywhere else that might be fitting for a national project, but at the United Nations.

Even more ominously, the DoJ press release says that the Strong Cities Network “will strengthen strategic planning and practices to address violent extremism in all its forms by fostering collaboration among cities, municipalities and other sub-national authorities.” Sub-national and international: the press release then quotes Governing Mayor Stian Berger Røsland of Oslo, Norway, a participant in the Strong Cities Network, saying: “To counter violent extremism we need determined action at all levels of governance. To succeed, we must coordinate our efforts and cooperate across borders. The Strong Cities Network will enable cities across the globe pool our resources, knowledge and best practices together and thus leave us standing stronger in the fight against one of the greatest threats to modern society.”

But what is that greatest threat, exactly? Remember, the DoJ presser says that the SCN will “address violent extremism in all its forms.” It also says that it will aid initiatives that are working toward “building social cohesion and resilience to violent extremism.” “Building social cohesion” is a euphemism for keeping peace between non-Muslim and Muslim communities – mostly by making sure that non-Muslims don’t complain too loudly about, much less work against, rapidly expanding Muslim populations and the Islamization of their communities.

The DoJ presser noted that at the launch of the Strong Cities Network, “welcoming remarks” would be offered by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Prince Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein and Mayor Bill de Blasio of New York City. The involvement of New York City’s Marxist internationalist mayor is yet another warning sign.

Assert American sovereignty and individual rights.
Contact your representatives now. Exhort them to oppose SCN now. Exhort them to keep America free – while it still is
Edited by ChileRelleno
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The one thing Ive learned, painfully, is nothing is impossible however improbable it may seem

 

Besides I doubt we are so lucky that the hand would be folded now that the bluff is obvious only to those few that can still think.

 

BO has outrages yet to be played. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

If true, this is a very dangerous step in our country's history.  If this happens and the country does not wake up and respond, our sovereignty and freedom will be lost.  No wonder Obama is hinting at gun confiscation via Australian style.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember the UN treaty that called for disarming the public? We all said it could never happen, as police & mil would never follow that order. Now he's got his own force, and a fresh new shooting to fuel the outrage. Buckle up kids!  tinfoilhat.gif

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Things are not bad enough yet for the vast unwashed masses to get off their dead dying asses.  But ... Remember we still have some time left in Obama's administration.  While anything is possible, what might occur is still a very low probability in my opinion.

 

However, closer to home and perhaps better suited to this excellent Saiga Forum, we can now perhaps have a better clear view of what the immediate future MAY hold for us gun owners.  Kinda like when it became apparent Obama was going to beat McCain?

 

Edited by HB;  toned way down

Edited by HB of CJ
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't they try this some years ago with Canada? The goobers (Gov) stated they would bring them in, a bunch of people wrote the Canadian Gov warning to stay out, at least they said they did...  ??  Can't remember why....   I have a question;

 

"Countering Violent Extremism" ?

 

Who is the extremist? The towel heads they bring into this country? Or those of us that are going to upraise against the goobers when they declare bankruptcy?

 

It's coming....

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Who is the extremist? The towel heads they bring into this country?.....

No. The picture of extremist the MSM and the traitor in DC are foisting on the sheep is the white, Christian, heterosexual male. Which to anyone with 2 brain cells know who the REAL terrorists are aside from the .gov. One of Barry's sons for example, showed his ass in Oregon this past week at one of the enemy's gun free zones and they are trying so hard to "make" this guy white.

The 2A was put in place for just this EXACT banana, republic dictatorship that is currently in place assisted by the MSM. This is why they so desperately want it eliminated. It's pretty clear what is going on.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Rhodes1968, on 04 Oct 2015 - 05:02 AM, said:

 

Yall come on over... welcome to the south ... rest a spell

 

UNHelmet.jpg

 

can you get that kind of penetration with ss109 or m855 ? 3 mm (0.12 in) of steel at 600 meters
Aren't the helmets made of Kevlar now?

 

Please God, remove this man from office!

Edited by Sim_Player
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Rhodes1968, on 04 Oct 2015 - 05:02 AM, said:

Yall come on over... welcome to the south ... rest a spell

 

UNHelmet.jpg

can you get that kind of penetration with ss109  or m855 ?     3 mm (0.12 in) of steel at 600 meters

 

hmmm me thinks good ol fashioned 30-06 is more likely...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember the UN treaty that called for disarming the public? We all said it could never happen, as police & mil would never follow that order. Now he's got his own force, and a fresh new shooting to fuel the outrage. Buckle up kids! tinfoilhat.gif

So Obama is leading some UN lambs to a slaughter house. Sounds good to me.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Rhodes1968, on 04 Oct 2015 - 05:02 AM, said:

Yall come on over... welcome to the south ... rest a spell

 

UNHelmet.jpg

can you get that kind of penetration with ss109  or m855 ?     3 mm (0.12 in) of steel at 600 meters

 

hmmm me thinks good ol fashioned 30-06 is more likely...

 

 

Good old fashioned 308 does nicely also 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Chatbox

    Load More
    You don't have permission to chat.
×
×
  • Create New...