Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Obama to impose new gun control curbs next week
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/01/01/obama-to-impose-new-gun-control-curbs-next-week/

 

HONOLULU — President Obama will meet with Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch on Monday to finalize a set of executive actions on guns that he will unveil next week, according to several individuals briefed on the matter.White House officials declined to comment on Obama’s plans beyond releasing his weekly radio address on Friday, a day earlier than usual. But according to those familiar with the proposal, who asked for anonymity because it was not yet public, the president will expand new background-check requirements for buyers who purchase weapons from high-volume gun dealers.

The president will also use his executive authority in several other areas, these individuals said, but the overall package has not yet been finalized.
In the radio address, Obama said he was moving unilaterally because Congress had failed to address the growing problem of gun violence.
“A few months ago, I directed my team at the White House to look into any new actions I can take to help reduce gun violence,” he said in the recorded address. “And on Monday, I’ll meet with our Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, to discuss our options.”

“Because I get too many letters from parents, and teachers, and kids, to sit around and do nothing,” Obama continued. “I get letters from responsible gun owners who grieve with us every time these tragedies happen; who share my belief that the Second Amendment guarantees a right to bear arms; and who share my belief we can protect that right while keeping an irresponsible, dangerous few from inflicting harm on a massive scale.”
[President Obama on current level of U.S. gun violence: 'This is not normal.']

Obama began examining how he could tighten the nation’s gun rules after October’s mass shooting at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Ore., but administration lawyers have spent months reviewing any proposals to ensure they can withstand legal scrutiny. The idea of requiring informal gun dealers to obtain a license from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and perform background checks on potential buyers first came up two years ago, but was shelved over legal concerns.

 

Full article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/01/01/obama-to-impose-new-gun-control-curbs-next-week/

 

  New Year's Resolutions of the Rich and Anti-Gun:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_ynRcIi1AI

  

Contact your Lawmakers:

https://www.nraila.org/take-action/write-your-lawmakers/

 

Edited by Sgt. Raven
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 188
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Liberals sometimes tell the truth.  When they think the microphones are turned off.   http://projectveritasaction.com/video/hidden-cam-dem-senate-candidate-russ-feingold-says-hillary-might-issue-execu

WATCH: Short Film ‘Praesidium’ Highlights Danger Of Gun-Free Zones http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2016/07/07/praesidium/ [video=youtube;hnBWa_xJz6A]  

Posted Images

"the president will expand new background-check requirements for buyers who purchase weapons from high-volume gun dealers."

 

Oh I just can't WAIT to find out what that means.  And it's either create new or expand existing, not expand new.  Morons.

 

"The idea of requiring informal gun dealers to obtain a license from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and perform background checks on potential buyers first came up two years ago, but was shelved over legal concerns."

 

"Informal gun dealers" would include every person who's ever sold a single gun in their life.  Or given one as a gift.  Or loaned one to a relative.  Or let someone else shoot it at the range. 

 

So they don't have the power at the moment to get universal registration, er, I mean universal background checks, so they go after the other end of the scale.  To the high-volume dealers, in a naked harassment play just like Operation Choke Point. 

Edited by Darth Saigus
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

The funny thing about this silly little clown running the county, he isn't very bright. He had a super majority when he was first elected, and could have done anything he wanted regarding guns. But what does he do, screws around with health care. Now the prick has to resort to EO to get what he wants. I would like to see his grades and want solid proof this ass was born in this country.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to see his grades and want solid proof this ass was born in this country.

You never will because they most likely don't exist. This person is a total fabrication from the start and most likely a criminal long before today.

 

 

A HISTORICAL LOOK AT BARRY SOETORO

 

 

 

 

Donald Trump is correct, Barry Soetoro, AKA Obama is hiding something in his past that is very bad and it may not be just his citizenship, it may well be a criminal past. (Trump would not say this if he did not know something and he has the money to get the dirt.)

 

As an IRS tax examiner I have seen what it appears Barry Soetoro has done, mostly by illegal aliens attempting to acquire a new identity in the U.S. and/or criminals looking to acquire a new ID.

 

Barry, AKA Obama, was lawfully adopted by a foreign national, Lolo Soetoro, and Barry's name was legally changed to "Barry Soetoro" (Barry’s own admission). Barry Soetoro was also made an official legal Indonesian citizen (again Barry’s own admission). The adoption would be noted in Barry's vital statistics record in Hawaii on his original birth certificate OR Lolo Soetoro may have always been Barry's legal birth father.

 

The public does not know for sure at this point who Barry's father really was and Barry himself may not know.

 

Barry was raised as a Muslim in Indonesia and attended a Catholic funded school that permitted all faiths to attend. Barry's mother dropped him as a dependent for some reason, maybe when Barry was adopted by Lolo Soetoro.

 

His mother's passport records dropped Barry as a dependent indicating Barry was no longer a legal dependent of his mother. (The passport records of his mother have been produced showing Barry was no longer a dependent when Barry was permanently residing in Indonesia.) Barry went to Hawaii to live with his alleged grandparents after Lolo Soetoro and Barry's mother divorced.

 

A "certificate of live birth" (NOT the original “long form”) can have names changed on it including a child's birth name, and birth parent’s names. Even a modified date of birth can be on a "certificate of live birth". This occurs frequently for adopted children where the birth parent does not want the child to know who they are.

 

The public has no idea who Barry’s real birth father is or who Barry’s real birth mother is. (Barry could have been adopted by his mother.) The original birth certificate is the only legal vital statistics record of a person’s birth parents, birth location, birth date, etc… I can get a “certificate of live birth” for a dead person; I cannot get a birth certificate of a dead person without “Deceased” on it (I’ve tried).

 

There is no evidence Barry Soetoro ever lawfully changed his name to “Barrack Hussein Obama”. There is no proof Barry Soetoro was born with the name "Barrack Hussein Obama". I’m willing to bet the name “Barrack Hussein Obama” is not present on the real birth certificate as Barry’s birth name or as Barry’s birth father.

 

I have pictures of me with my mother and Jimmy Buffet… That doesn’t make him my father even if I start using the name Jimmy Buffet.

 

The public knows Barry Soetoro finished high school in Hawaii as Barry Soetoro and attended Occidental as Barry Soetoro where he did drugs and flunked out of school. After dropping out of Occidental, Barry showed up in New York, homeless and on drugs. (Barry’s own admission.) Barry then hooked up with a Pakistani man to live with and traveled back to Indonesia on his new boyfriend’s dime to renew his Indonesian passport and traveled to Pakistan with him.

 

Ask any law enforcement officer in a large city or detective and they will tell you homeless young men on drugs in large cities usually end up as male prostitutes. Barry ended up as a world traveler with a degree… (Not likely.)

 

Barry Soetoro returned to New York from Pakistan and began using the fictitious name “Obama” for some reason (again Barry Soetoro’s own admission). One could only suspect that a person addicted to drugs returning from Pakistan to New York (the main route for Afghan heroin into the U.S.), had a reason to start using a new name.

 

There are literally over 1 million open warrants on file in New York… Maybe Barry is one of them?

 

After spending some time in New York allegedly working under the name “Obama”, It appears Barry used the fictitious name "Barrack Hussein Obama" for the first time to file his federal taxes in Connecticut at a Post Office Box for the purpose of evading paying taxes in New York and/or to establish a new identity. (This is a felony with no statute of limitation.)

 

When the IRS received Barry Soetoro’s federal tax filing, the IRS could not attach the name Barrack Hussein Obama to the SSI number provided or the address provided.

So the IRS assigned the fictitious name "Barrack Hussein Obama" a tax ID number for a person from Connecticut (where Barry unlawfully filed a federal tax form using a false name). Barry Soetoro began using the tax ID number as his SSI number when using the fictitious name Barrack Obama. This is why Barry Soetoro has a Connecticut SSI number.

 

When I worked for the IRS, I saw this occur more than once and yes, it is a felony to knowingly file a fraudulent federal tax forms. Most of the politicians that cheat on their taxes claim it was an accident. That is how they get away with their tax cheat crimes. Using a fake name is no accident.

 

It appears Barry fled New York to Chicago using his new identity to get a job. He likely ordered a fake diploma to bolster his new identity as "Obama". Fake Diploma's were very big in the 80's and diploma mills were even being used by federal workers to get promotions. There is evidence his alleged attendance at Columbia was faked (Barry never attended Columbia) and Barry lied his way into Harvard (he had no transcripts to get in). Including telling the Saudi royal family he was fighting in Afghanistan with the Muslim Jihad against the Russians, so they would help him get into a law school.

 

The Saudi's apparently loved Barry's story of Jihad in Pakistan/Afghanistan and paid for Barry to attend Harvard under the name "Obama”. The Saudi family has admitted to paying for Obama to attend Harvard and gave Harvard a gift of $20 million dollars. Harvard in turn made their special attendee President of the Law Review, even though he was a person that never wrote a single law review.

 

I guess that is what $20 million buys at Harvard. It is unlikely Barry was a Jihadist and was, most likely, a drug mule if anything, maybe even a CIA (multiple reports of this) street hire to haul Afghan heroin back to New York, so the Afghans could buy U.S. made stinger missiles with U.S. dollars to shoot down Russian helicopters.

 

I hired people overseas to do work below my pay grade all the time, even foreign nationals.

 

I think this is the story Barry told the Saudi's, but he was most likely really just a drug mule/dealer and probably still WANTED on an outstanding warrant in New York.

 

Barry’s Selective Service registration is not normal either…

 

http://wwwdebbieschlusselcom/4428/exclusive-did-next-commande...

 

After I looked at Barry’s Selective Service filing I noticed it was most likely fraudulent based on the name he used. Barry did not start using the name "Obama" until he returned from Pakistan (long after he flunked out of school in California). His Selective Service record (maintained in Chicago coincidentally) shows he registered at a Hawaiian post office as “Obama” in Sept. 1980.

 

Problem, Barry was getting high in California at Occidental in Sept. 1980 (Barry's admission) and was not using the fictitious name "Obama" at that time.

 

Barry began using the fictitious name "Obama" only after he returned from Pakistan so the Selective Service filing is fraudulent.

 

Barry returned to Chicago and attend a semi-Christian radical black church with his first female love Michelle.

 

Barry admits keeping in touch with Phil Boener, who traveled to New York from Occidental to be with Barry and was most likely Barry's first love.

 

Barry still could not get a real job, because he was still a fraud, even with his Harvard degree in hand he could lie and take the Bar exam, but he could not work as a lawyer for a major law firm without a background investigation and he would never pass one, so Michelle got Barry a job at her law firm.

 

Barry never filed a case alone and never filed a motion.

 

He wrote lots of memos according to the law firm where Barry worked. (I think they knew Barry was a fraud and don't want to be sued by previous clients.) Barry rescinded his law licenses, so as not to be disbarred for fraud.

 

The Bar knows Barry lied on his application.

 

Michelle also had to turn over her law license for her involvement in corruption with the Chicago mayor’s office.

 

It appears that this was the time period Larry Sinclair writes about in which Barry did his cocaine and additional homosexual activities in Chicago, even though he now had a one year old daughter at home with Michelle. One can only guess that she accepted his bisexual nature while recognizing his potential for bigger things. (Sounds like Hillary and Bill in Russia, doesn’t it?)

 

With time on his hands Barry, a well spoken black man, was able to get elected to a state office, oddly because he looked for fraud in his opponents voter registrations and got his opponent disqualified from running.

 

Barry, a well-versed liar, was a natural in state politics.

 

He used his political influence to get himself a position as a lecturer at Chicago's law school. Barry embellished this position as a "professor of law" which everyone knows is completely false. Barry was not a professor or even a specialist at anything but lying.

 

On a whim Barry ran for United States Senate for the State of Illinois. Politicians do this all the time to make a name for themselves even if they can't win.

 

At the time the Republican Ryan was a shoe-in for the Senate seat, so no real Democrat contenders entered the race, but Barry did. On a fluke after the primary Ryan's wife Jeri Ryan (Seven of nine from Star Trek), went public that her husband was making her have sex with other people while he watched. Ryan dropped out and Alan Keys moved from Maryland to run against Barry Soetoro.

 

The election got all kinds of press because there were no blacks in the U.S. Senate and one of these black men was going to be a Senator.

 

Alan Keys did his best to warn everyone Barry was not who he claimed to be, but the public saw him as a carpet bagger. Barry kept the lie going and presented himself as a clean black man that talked like a white man.

 

Illinois elected Barry to U.S. Senate. The Democrats had already began scrubbing Barry's background when Ryan dropped out.

 

Phil, Barry's boyfriend from Occidental, was found working in California as a communications specialist (receptionist) for a dental hygienist school and given a diploma from Columbia and a cover story.

 

The rest of Barry's drug friends were all given jobs or money by the Democrat machine to keep quiet.

 

Because Barry was such a news maker as the only Black in the Senate and he could speak like a white man, he was made key speaker for the Democrat convention. Barry then decided to run for President to keep the lie going. No one thought to question Barry's background in the Democrat party.

 

As suspicions arose, they helped cover up the ugly background.

 

The only person jumping up and down warning Barry was not who he claimed to be was Alan Keys and he was discarded as just an angry loser.

 

Now we have a complete fraud sitting in the Office of the President.

 

Clearly the most corrupt, inexperienced, and ignorant President in the history of the United States who's only quality is that he can lie with a straight face.”

 

-- Article written by “Atom Ant” --

Edited by JAG
Link to post
Share on other sites

What I think is funny is that you are about to do the same thing by putting another moron in office, around and around she goes where it stops nobody knows.....  None of these cock suckers care about this country and you are about to do the same thing...LMFAO

 

I HAVE MY BIRTH CERTIFICATE IN HAND!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Texas Governor to Obama on Executive Gun Control: ‘COME AND TAKE IT’

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/01/03/texas-governor-obama-executive-gun-control-come-take/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social

Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s response on Twitter to Obama saying he will be imposing more gun control – “COME AND TAKE IT.”

The Texas Governor who himself graced the front of a Texas Monthly magazine cover armed with a shotgun, tweeted, “Obama wants to impose more gun control. My response.#? COME AND TAKE IT @NRA #tcot #PJNET”
His tweet which includes a “COME AND TAKE IT” flag has gone viral. The flag, also known as the “Gonzales Flag,” is an iconic symbol of Texas independence. The flag was originally flown during a battle in Gonzales, Texas, in 1835 during the lead up to the Texas war of independence from Mexico.

The governor attached to his tweet The Washington Post article “Obama plans curbs on guns.” The article stated that the President will meet Monday with U.S. Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch and will thereafter announce his executive actions on gun control. Obama made this statement during his weekly radio address, released a day earlier than usual thePost reported.
The article said that one of those reforms is likely to “require some unlicensed gun dealers to get licenses and conduct background checks on potential buyers.”
The tweet by the Texas governor has received 2.6K retreets, and 2.8 likes, as of the time of publication.

Prior to being elected governor, Abbott was the longest serving attorney general in the Lone Star state’s history. In that capacity he sued President Obama 31 times, including leading the way for the fight against the President’s unlawful executive order on amnesty.
As reported by Breitbart Texas, on the first day after he won the election for Governor, Abbott vowed he would sign an open carry bill if the Texas Legislature sent one to his desk. The Texas Governor tweeted, “I’m warming up my signing pen: Texas Legislature Ready to Move Forward on Open Carry Bill” and attached Breitbart Texas’ Bob Price’s article.

Breitbart Texas was at the Texas Capitol on January 1 when Second Amendment advocates were there to celebrate the first day of open carry in Texas, as reported.
Catherine Frazier, a spokeswoman for Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) (R-Tex.) was reported to have said that “President Obama is trying to distract Americans from his failure to address the true threat of radical Islamic terrorism, and instead going after the rights of law-abiding American citizens — it is complete lunacy. If Ted Cruz is elected president, the lawlessness will end on Day One, and Americans’ personal liberties will be restored and protected.”

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

And now in his Finite wisdom he's going to have a "town hall" meeting on the subject...

Hosted by CNN and featuring Anderson Cooper, we can be assured there won't be anyone there who actually knows a damn thing about Firearms.

 

:rolleyes:

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it seems "high volume gun dealer" is actually new-speak for a citizen who buys or sells more than one gun, based on what I've seen over the weekend. So we can expect obuttfuckers EO to go after you and me by declaring us unlicensed dealers.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it seems "high volume gun dealer" is actually new-speak for a citizen who buys or sells more than one gun, based on what I've seen over the weekend. So we can expect obuttfuckers EO to go after you and me by declaring us unlicensed dealers.

 

If true, that should help create a greater level of solidarity on this issue for the average gun owner.  Infringement on the many and escalating cost will result in a reaction to his "Executive Order".  Obama is almost beyond belief. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

And now in his Finite wisdom he's going to have a "town hall" meeting on the subject...

Hosted by CNN and featuring Anderson Cooper, we can be assured there won't be anyone there who actually knows a damn thing about Firearms.

 

rolleyes.gif

Watch this Thursday, 7pm et for a glimpse of what this asshat wants to attempt to do next week...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obama details executive action on gun restrictions

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-to-unveil-new-gun-restrictions-slams-congress-for-inaction/2016/01/04/81d539e8-b2fb-11e5-a842-0feb51d1d124_story.html

----


3 things Obama's plan will do on guns and 3 things it won't

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/01/04/obama-guns-proposals-sales-nra-ryan/78282918/
 

If Americans were waiting for President Obama to use his executive authority to totally shut the "gun show loophole" or ban assault weapons, they may be disappointed by the initiative the White House unveiled Monday. The White House instead rolled out a batch of narrowly tailored administrative actions that may have more to do with lawyers than guns.Here are three things that are in the package (according to the White House fact sheet):

• Hiring more people to run the FBI background check system, so the government can be "processing background checks 24 hours a day, 7 days a week."
• Requesting from Congress an additional $500 million to increase access to mental health care.
• Clarifying that people selling guns over the Internet can still be required to conduct background checks on buyers if they are "engaged in the business" of selling guns, not just a hobbyist.

And here's the stuff discussed in the days before the announcement that is NOT in the package:
• A requirement that every gun sale in the country is proceeded by a criminal background check.
• A ban on gun sales to people on terrorist "no-fly" lists.
• A ban on large capacity magazines that hold a lot of bullets.

The reason for the difference is that the administration does not believe it has authority under existing laws to do the bigger stuff. So they are using administrative actions to squeeze the stuff out of the corners of existing laws.
Here are the details of the initiative from the White House.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's it?  All that hype...  For 2 things that actually make sense, and one thing that is just a restating of current law?

 

I was all ready to be mad...

 

Edited by Darth Saigus
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

The "unlicensed dealers" thing would require resigistration to truly enforce. I have a feeling there are lots of tidbits of interesting stuff buried in these seemingly harmless (to the average moron) proposals.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Chatbox

    Load More
    You don't have permission to chat.
×
×
  • Create New...