SHOTGUN MESIAH 855 Posted January 8, 2016 Report Share Posted January 8, 2016 It would be nice if this one passes…….but I'm not holding my breath. https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/1/8/congressman-to-introduce-fifty-state-concealed-carry-reciprocity-bill Quote Link to post Share on other sites
patriot 7,197 Posted January 8, 2016 Report Share Posted January 8, 2016 Too bad they don't just recognize the origin of the 2nd Amendment and leave us the hell alone. God told us to carry, as well as to protect ourselves and our families. Luke 22:36, among others. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gunfun 3,931 Posted January 8, 2016 Report Share Posted January 8, 2016 *He told some to carry. 1/6 was apparently "enough" of a ratio for Him. And He had to know they were packing already. If someone you spend all day with for years has a sword under his robe, I guarantee you know it. (Especially a guy like Peter.) So He was making a point. I have ideas about what points He was making, but you can draw those conclusions for yourself. He wasn't commanding that every man must be armed, just that some ought to be. Also He didn't bring this up first thing or make a point of being armed himself, so far as we know. Some guys limit this verse too much, and some try to turn it into a universal command. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
patriot 7,197 Posted January 8, 2016 Report Share Posted January 8, 2016 ...and some use it to divide. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SHOTGUN MESIAH 855 Posted January 9, 2016 Author Report Share Posted January 9, 2016 (edited) The big book of lies. We now return you to the original topic………. Edited January 9, 2016 by SHOTGUN MESSIAH 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChileRelleno 7,071 Posted January 9, 2016 Report Share Posted January 9, 2016 It would be nice if this one passes…….but I'm not holding my breath. https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/1/8/congressman-to-introduce-fifty-state-concealed-carry-reciprocity-bill I don't want the Feds involved in it, not even a little bit. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
David Mark 2,452 Posted January 9, 2016 Report Share Posted January 9, 2016 It would be nice if this one passes…….but I'm not holding my breath. https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/1/8/congressman-to-introduce-fifty-state-concealed-carry-reciprocity-bill I don't want the Feds involved in it, not even a little bit. Unles it's a Supreme Court ruling codifying the true meaning of the Second Ammendment. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blessthefall 27 Posted January 9, 2016 Report Share Posted January 9, 2016 (edited) I'm pretty sure the sword in 22:36 is merely symbolic. Historically, swords were expensive to own and very, very few people had them. Definitely not something your average joe could just run out and buy during pretty much any time in history. Hell, even today, an actual quality sword like one by Albion costs as much or more than some rifles. And I don't count those Made in India pieces of shit at the renaissance faire as weapons. Edited January 9, 2016 by blessthefall Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gunfun 3,931 Posted January 9, 2016 Report Share Posted January 9, 2016 I'm pretty sure the sword in 22:36 is merely symbolic. Historically, swords were expensive to own and very, very few people had them. Definitely not something your average joe could just run out and buy during pretty much any time in history. Hell, even today, an actual quality sword like one by Albion costs as much or more than some rifles. And I don't count those Made in India pieces of shit at the renaissance faire as weapons. I'm pretty sure the sword in 22:36 is merely symbolic. Historically, swords were expensive to own and very, very few people had them. Definitely not something your average joe could just run out and buy during pretty much any time in history. Hell, even today, an actual quality sword like one by Albion costs as much or more than some rifles. And I don't count those Made in India pieces of shit at the renaissance faire as weapons. Nope. A basic sword from roman through medieval times was about a week's-or two week's wages for an average guy. Many people had them, but in most countries civilians in towns were limited to a ~cubit long blade. -traveling merchants, bankers etc. got more leeway. Peter didn't whack of a guy's ear with a symbol, he did it with a sharpened iron bar made for the exclusive purpose of killing people. This covers the topic for midevial Europe, but I have seen scholarly discussions for roman times too. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dogster 577 Posted January 9, 2016 Report Share Posted January 9, 2016 Dangerous precedent for the feds to do this. They could just as easily pass another forbidding carry if this went into place. What seems to be a good thing on the surface, if you apply serious thought, can often further a negative agenda. The less the Feds interfere in 2A arena, the better. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rhodes1968 1,638 Posted January 9, 2016 Report Share Posted January 9, 2016 DC can go stuff itself up it's own arse. If I ever go back to that place again gun laws wouldn't matter. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.