Wolverine 10,360 Posted March 16, 2016 Report Share Posted March 16, 2016 http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/03/16/merrick-garland-five-facts/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social Quote Link to post Share on other sites
yakdung 2,926 Posted March 16, 2016 Report Share Posted March 16, 2016 Think its bad now, wait until Hillary is president. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rhodes1968 1,638 Posted March 16, 2016 Report Share Posted March 16, 2016 I like to think had the framers intended that the court was going to end up being used as it has there would have been a crap load more written on it in the document. I like to think that at least, perhaps it is working as intended but I somehow doubt they were that stupid or malicious. If all it did was mediate issues between the states a lot less would be on the line here. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wolverine 10,360 Posted March 16, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 16, 2016 Justice Scalia warned there is too much power vested in the Court. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
HB of CJ 1,263 Posted March 16, 2016 Report Share Posted March 16, 2016 This guy sounds like a Commie to me. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Vance665 225 Posted March 16, 2016 Report Share Posted March 16, 2016 This guy is 60 something years old. Obama can't be serious hes just trying to make the Republican congress look bad. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wolverine 10,360 Posted March 16, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 16, 2016 I think Obama is doing whatever he can to get at the Second Amendment. This pick would all but assure that....as his legacy for years to come. I hope the Republicans surprise me and stand strong against this guy and nominees like him. 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rhodes1968 1,638 Posted March 16, 2016 Report Share Posted March 16, 2016 Justice Scalia warned there is too much power vested in the Court. If by vested you mean seized then yes. But they got away with it giving pause to just what was intended there, certainly it wasn't to settle border disputes between MI and OH. People invest far too much awe on the framers or their little document. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
storm6490 2,768 Posted March 16, 2016 Report Share Posted March 16, 2016 Wont happen. Bozo is just posturing for his commie buddies running the EU and UN. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Machinist 150 Posted March 16, 2016 Report Share Posted March 16, 2016 He is part of the Shitcago clan...He is anti 2A... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
yakdung 2,926 Posted March 16, 2016 Report Share Posted March 16, 2016 Ladies and gents, make certain you have everything gun related you want/need. Rough seas ahead IMO. Both sides of the isle hate you. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
evlblkwpnz 3,418 Posted March 17, 2016 Report Share Posted March 17, 2016 Ladies and gents, make certain you have everything gun related you want/need. Rough seas ahead IMO. Both sides of the isle hate you. I'm convinced they want the same shit or the GOP wouldn't cave so much. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sim_Player 1,939 Posted March 17, 2016 Report Share Posted March 17, 2016 (edited) 50 million little Alamos would likely be the result of banning guns, in the USA. Especially now. They better hold the line. Edited March 17, 2016 by Sim_Player Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ronin38 2,117 Posted March 17, 2016 Report Share Posted March 17, 2016 Gotta love how he whines about "doing his Constitutional Duty" whenever he thinks it might suit him, but ignores or trashes our Constitution the rest of the time. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.