M17S (aka Bushmaster Bullpup) vs Steyr Aug
#1
Posted 28 April 2004 - 08:10 PM
#2
Posted 09 May 2004 - 09:43 AM
http://www.kurtskust...134.htm#image_1
Hope this helps:
ed
#3
Guest_Guest_*
Posted 09 May 2004 - 02:50 PM
#4
Posted 10 May 2004 - 02:09 PM
The price difference I'm sure is increased (inflated) artificially by the ban on Augs while the M17S is still manufactured locally.
#5
Posted 10 May 2004 - 03:41 PM
The Bush Bullpup is based on the reliable AR-18/180 that has been the base for many rifles that don't give it any credit. The HK G36 uses its gas system, as do a many others.
My main deterrent from the Bushpup was weight. Overall weight, and butt weight. I prefer barrel heavy to butt heavy if the choice must be made. It should lean forward with one hand on the grip, not back.
If this is not a deterrent to you, go for it.
Note that long squishy triggers are generally inherent to the bullpup design.
From this place we will deliver notice to the parlaiments of conquerors that a line has been drawn against the darkness.
And we will hold that line, no matter the cost. - John Sheridan, 2259
They Invade our space, and we fall back. They assimilate entire worlds, and we fall back. The line must be drawn here, now! This time they will go no further! And I will make them pay for what they've done. - Jean Luc Picard, 2376
#6
Posted 10 May 2004 - 04:59 PM
The original is a 20" overal gun with 10" barrel 50 round magazine using the deadly 5.7x28 (this ammo is for LEO it can go through multiple layers of kevlar)
Attached Files
Edited by Dante, 10 May 2004 - 05:01 PM.
#7
Posted 22 May 2004 - 10:49 AM
Wtf kinda gun izzat in the pic? I like guns that look like a gun and not a jack from a Yugo.
#8
Posted 26 May 2004 - 09:39 PM
Like I said before, that is a P90. That gun will put most small-medium caliber semi-autos to shame. This is waaay better than a mp5. It uses special LEO ammo that can go through many layers of kevlar. This gun has a wierd look becuase it is utalitarian in design. They weren't going for a classic rifle look, but more functional.Dante:
Wtf kinda gun izzat in the pic? I like guns that look like a gun and not a jack from a Yugo.
#9
Posted 27 May 2004 - 11:54 AM
Back to the orig thread: one good thing about augs is that you can switch them from right handed to left handed easily.
(This is also nice about the p90, which is basically ambidextrous)
They finally be 'spectin our leftie authority!
#10
Posted 28 May 2004 - 10:34 AM
The AUG is vastly superior to the Bushmaster M17S. The Germans make the best stuff. I know, I know, the AUG is made in Austria. Same, same! That's why Glocks are so great!
swon
#11
Posted 15 June 2008 - 11:56 AM
#12
Posted 15 June 2008 - 12:02 PM
The P90 is made by FN. They have a new manufacturing plant in Columbia, South Carolina. They could make the P90 in that plant, they might already be making them there for all I know.
The AUG is vastly superior to the Bushmaster M17S. The Germans make the best stuff. I know, I know, the AUG is made in Austria. Same, same! That's why Glocks are so great!
swon
B.M.I. originally created the M17s in Australia for the military but was turned down when they elected to go with the Steyr Aug, I wouldn't say it is vastly superior. Less kinks yes, maybe but when you discontinue production on a rifle there is rarely follow up R&D performed. The M17s has some of its own interesting quirks that make it an awsome rifle. For instance I have a pre ban M17s and by slipping out the rear pin it become full auto.
As for Germans making the best stuff I would take a 1911 over a glock any day. Too blocky and bad accuracy at long ranges.
#13
Posted 15 June 2008 - 04:47 PM
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ - I stand with Arizona!
Proud Member of the Top 10 9 posters of all time!
#14
Posted 15 June 2008 - 06:00 PM
#15
Posted 16 June 2008 - 01:32 PM
euhm, i take it you're talking about the PS90, which is the civilian semi-auto model of the P90 and the FS2000, which is the civilian semi-auto version of the F2000.FN has in fact released a civy version of the P90 as well as the P2000 which has a shorter barrel and a five round spent brass tube, that will auto open and drop out the casings if firing is continued. With the shorter barrel it does require a pistol permit for purchase. They definately took it to the next level with the 2000. I will be adding one to my collection shortly.
the PS90 has by default a long barrel. about twice as long as the P90. in states where it is allowed however you can fit a smaller barrel, same length as the P90.
for the FS2000, the barrel is also a tad longer than the F2000. you could hack it down a little and recrown, but i don't see why.
"Reason is always a kind of brute force; those who appeal to the head rather than the heart, however pallid and polite, are necessarily men of violence. We speak of touching a man's heart, but we can do nothing to his head but hit it."
#16
Posted 16 June 2008 - 04:47 PM
euhm, i take it you're talking about the PS90, which is the civilian semi-auto model of the P90 and the FS2000, which is the civilian semi-auto version of the F2000.FN has in fact released a civy version of the P90 as well as the P2000 which has a shorter barrel and a five round spent brass tube, that will auto open and drop out the casings if firing is continued. With the shorter barrel it does require a pistol permit for purchase. They definately took it to the next level with the 2000. I will be adding one to my collection shortly.
the PS90 has by default a long barrel. about twice as long as the P90. in states where it is allowed however you can fit a smaller barrel, same length as the P90.
for the FS2000, the barrel is also a tad longer than the F2000. you could hack it down a little and recrown, but i don't see why.
Its entirely possible it could have been the PS90 but I don't recall it being called so. The one I'm referring to was just long enough to be considered a rifle and could be purchased in either semi auto or automatic fire. I really couldn't tell you teh specs on either of them never really looked into much beyond the gun counter. The 2000 just looks a lot sleeker to me and not like something out of a alien movie. As far as cutting the barrel down I don't see why you would do that either. I just know that the one they showed me required a pistol permit to buy because the barrel was short enough to qualify it to be a handgun.
#17
Posted 16 June 2008 - 09:49 PM
1911
http://transsylvania...their-guns.html
Our Republic's Founders had it right. "To disarm the people is
the best and most effectual way to enslave them," warned George
Mason. Patrick Henry concurred, imploring future generations:
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one
who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve
it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are
inevitably ruined.
#18
Posted 17 June 2008 - 01:54 PM
i think you're totally mixing two different things together.Its entirely possible it could have been the PS90 but I don't recall it being called so. The one I'm referring to was just long enough to be considered a rifle and could be purchased in either semi auto or automatic fire. I really couldn't tell you teh specs on either of them never really looked into much beyond the gun counter. The 2000 just looks a lot sleeker to me and not like something out of a alien movie. As far as cutting the barrel down I don't see why you would do that either. I just know that the one they showed me required a pistol permit to buy because the barrel was short enough to qualify it to be a handgun.
the smallest produced barrel on an F2000 is 40cm (+-15.5inch), the civilian FS2000 is over 17 inches.
the longer barreled PS90 is 16 inches, the short barreled PS90 or the P90 are 10 inch.
"Reason is always a kind of brute force; those who appeal to the head rather than the heart, however pallid and polite, are necessarily men of violence. We speak of touching a man's heart, but we can do nothing to his head but hit it."
#19
Posted 18 June 2008 - 05:49 AM
i think you're totally mixing two different things together.Its entirely possible it could have been the PS90 but I don't recall it being called so. The one I'm referring to was just long enough to be considered a rifle and could be purchased in either semi auto or automatic fire. I really couldn't tell you teh specs on either of them never really looked into much beyond the gun counter. The 2000 just looks a lot sleeker to me and not like something out of a alien movie. As far as cutting the barrel down I don't see why you would do that either. I just know that the one they showed me required a pistol permit to buy because the barrel was short enough to qualify it to be a handgun.
the smallest produced barrel on an F2000 is 40cm (+-15.5inch), the civilian FS2000 is over 17 inches.
the longer barreled PS90 is 16 inches, the short barreled PS90 or the P90 are 10 inch.
All I know is they had this one tagged as a a 2000 and it had a barrel that couldn't have been over tweleve inches long, and they couldn't legally sell it unless you had a pistol permit. That's all I really have to go on. I know I'm not mixing that with anything else it's the only one I keep looking at. I don't know if they changed the specs on the models they are releasing or whatever, but this is definately a 2000 with an extremely short barrel I mean it barely makes it past the fore stock, for lack of a better term, before terminating into a muzzle break.
#20
Posted 18 June 2008 - 01:57 PM
both are bullpups, dude. even if the barrel "barely makes it past the furniture", it's still over 15 inches long...All I know is they had this one tagged as a a 2000 and it had a barrel that couldn't have been over tweleve inches long, and they couldn't legally sell it unless you had a pistol permit. That's all I really have to go on. I know I'm not mixing that with anything else it's the only one I keep looking at. I don't know if they changed the specs on the models they are releasing or whatever, but this is definately a 2000 with an extremely short barrel I mean it barely makes it past the fore stock, for lack of a better term, before terminating into a muzzle break.
picture attached is a FS2000 with a 17 inch barrel.
i dont think you can hack down a F2000/FS2000 shorter than 14 inch (or you'd be INSIDE the furniture).
Attached Files
"Reason is always a kind of brute force; those who appeal to the head rather than the heart, however pallid and polite, are necessarily men of violence. We speak of touching a man's heart, but we can do nothing to his head but hit it."
#21
Posted 19 June 2008 - 06:08 AM
both are bullpups, dude. even if the barrel "barely makes it past the furniture", it's still over 15 inches long...All I know is they had this one tagged as a a 2000 and it had a barrel that couldn't have been over tweleve inches long, and they couldn't legally sell it unless you had a pistol permit. That's all I really have to go on. I know I'm not mixing that with anything else it's the only one I keep looking at. I don't know if they changed the specs on the models they are releasing or whatever, but this is definately a 2000 with an extremely short barrel I mean it barely makes it past the fore stock, for lack of a better term, before terminating into a muzzle break.
picture attached is a FS2000 with a 17 inch barrel.
i dont think you can hack down a F2000/FS2000 shorter than 14 inch (or you'd be INSIDE the furniture).
I understand both are bullpups but the one that I have been looking at is shorter than that one. where the forestock ends is literally right where the muzzlebreak is. there isn't any exposed barrel beyond enough to thread the muzzel break on to.
#22
Posted 19 June 2008 - 06:11 AM
both are bullpups, dude. even if the barrel "barely makes it past the furniture", it's still over 15 inches long...All I know is they had this one tagged as a a 2000 and it had a barrel that couldn't have been over tweleve inches long, and they couldn't legally sell it unless you had a pistol permit. That's all I really have to go on. I know I'm not mixing that with anything else it's the only one I keep looking at. I don't know if they changed the specs on the models they are releasing or whatever, but this is definately a 2000 with an extremely short barrel I mean it barely makes it past the fore stock, for lack of a better term, before terminating into a muzzle break.
picture attached is a FS2000 with a 17 inch barrel.
i dont think you can hack down a F2000/FS2000 shorter than 14 inch (or you'd be INSIDE the furniture).
I understand both are bullpups but the one that I have been looking at is shorter than that one. where the forestock ends is literally right where the muzzlebreak is. there isn't any exposed barrel beyond enough to thread the muzzel break on to.
I could be longer than I thought I don't really know. I don't generally walk around with a tape measure, I was just taking an educated guess.
#23
Posted 19 June 2008 - 01:19 PM
both are bullpups, dude. even if the barrel "barely makes it past the furniture", it's still over 15 inches long...All I know is they had this one tagged as a a 2000 and it had a barrel that couldn't have been over tweleve inches long, and they couldn't legally sell it unless you had a pistol permit. That's all I really have to go on. I know I'm not mixing that with anything else it's the only one I keep looking at. I don't know if they changed the specs on the models they are releasing or whatever, but this is definately a 2000 with an extremely short barrel I mean it barely makes it past the fore stock, for lack of a better term, before terminating into a muzzle break.
picture attached is a FS2000 with a 17 inch barrel.
i dont think you can hack down a F2000/FS2000 shorter than 14 inch (or you'd be INSIDE the furniture).
I understand both are bullpups but the one that I have been looking at is shorter than that one. where the forestock ends is literally right where the muzzlebreak is. there isn't any exposed barrel beyond enough to thread the muzzel break on to.
I could be longer than I thought I don't really know. I don't generally walk around with a tape measure, I was just taking an educated guess.
If that picture showed it in a man's hands, you'd probably think it was the right gun. It's like a toy.
#24
Posted 19 June 2008 - 01:54 PM
so here you got them all. F2000 (note bayonet lug), the FN P90 and the chick with PS90 (long barreled version).If that picture showed it in a man's hands, you'd probably think it was the right gun. It's like a toy.
(and the FS2000 i already posted (the chick shooting it))
Attached Files
"Reason is always a kind of brute force; those who appeal to the head rather than the heart, however pallid and polite, are necessarily men of violence. We speak of touching a man's heart, but we can do nothing to his head but hit it."
#25
Posted 29 September 2010 - 09:59 PM
I own 2 Austrian made A1 AUGs and a (factory refurbished to newer generation style) Bushmaster M17S.
See them (and other bullpups) here in my Left Hand Bullpup Shooting video:
The only thing the Bushmaster has over the AUG (especially AUGs with rails) is price.
One could argue that the M17S' plastic pistol-like BUIS are nice as they're built in and decently on target.
These are better than the just for decoration irons on the original carry handle sight Swarovski Cobra 1.5X24mm, but on railed AUGs (A1 Special Receiver, A2, A3, MSAR, etc.) you have a wider choice of better BUIS.
If you look at the video above, you could argue that of the 2 guns, when unsuppressed, the Bushmaster has a slightly more user friendly ejection pattern for lefties.
When you add a red dot or muzzle can to the AUG, this becomes more moot.
Even discounting the AUG option of a left handed bolt (that the M17S lacks), both are totally usuable in movement drills and pie slicing when shooting from left shoulder.
My personal Bushmaster has wayyy too many FTEs and FTFs (even with PMags) for me to trust it.
The Bushmaster has only one barrel length, the AUG has several you can swap easily.
The Bushmaster has many parts that can only be removed via tools, including roll pins holding in the firing pin and extractor.
The AUG strips down into smaller components as easily as the M16/AR-15/M4-series.
The Bushmaster went out of production when Cerberus took over. Good luck finding spares.
AUG spares are plentiful, if expensive.
Bushmaster rail is short and plastic.
AUG A2/A3/MSAR rail is longer, so more sight options.
AUG is overall more retrofitable.
People who whine about the AUGs' plastic should be aware you can run the dang thing over with a truck dozens of times (as Steyr did in product demos) with no ill effects.
Lots of metal guns won't fare as well.
M17S is a fun gun.
AUG is a working gun.
The video above should prove southpaws have nothing to fear either.
#26
Posted 30 September 2010 - 02:33 PM
So do you think this is reliable enough to waste money on if I lengthen the barrel (hopefully the problem of the FTE, FTF)?
Edited by YARP, 30 September 2010 - 02:34 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













