IndyArms 10,186 Posted October 19, 2016 Report Share Posted October 19, 2016 Anyone able too confirm this and the happenings thereafter from this??? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ronin38 2,117 Posted October 19, 2016 Report Share Posted October 19, 2016 Huh?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDeko 792 Posted October 19, 2016 Report Share Posted October 19, 2016 Are you saying now that he's been compromised you think a contingency will kick in and dump all the remaining documents? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
IndyArms 10,186 Posted October 19, 2016 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2016 That's what I've heard...that ALL the documents will be released...wondered if anyone could prove or deny this...I can't find anything concrete... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rhodes1968 1,638 Posted October 19, 2016 Report Share Posted October 19, 2016 His internet access has been cut off, Zero Hedge is covering. It is possible. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
patriot 7,197 Posted October 19, 2016 Report Share Posted October 19, 2016 His internet access has been cut off, Zero Hedge is covering. It is possible. ...and he only has one way to get to the Web? Unlikely. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Gaddis 1,689 Posted October 19, 2016 Report Share Posted October 19, 2016 Like a document dump will make that big of a difference anyway, the useless idiots will still vote in droves for their Queen. G_d, I hate living in an area teeming with retarded Progressive types. We really need a barf emoticon in the forum here. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDeko 792 Posted October 19, 2016 Report Share Posted October 19, 2016 I honestly have no hope for the future. By this time next year there will be no "gun culture" and if we're still alive in 40 years we'll be telling our descendants about the far flung past where civilians were allowed to own firearms. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
patriot 7,197 Posted October 19, 2016 Report Share Posted October 19, 2016 Like a document dump will make that big of a difference anyway, the useless idiots will still vote in droves for their Queen. G_d, I hate living in an area teeming with retarded Progressive types. We really need a barf emoticon in the forum here. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
HB of CJ 1,263 Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 I still have hope. One could imagine with severe paranoia that maximum effort would have been made to insure, (hope?) that multiple dead man switches would be in place for exactly this kind of situation. Multiple. Comprehensive. At this level of play nothing else would serve? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
evlblkwpnz 3,418 Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 I honestly have no hope for the future. By this time next year there will be no "gun culture" and if we're still alive in 40 years we'll be telling our descendants about the far flung past where civilians were allowed to own firearms. Hush. Everything will be fine. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
YOT 3,743 Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 I honestly have no hope for the future. By this time next year there will be no "gun culture" and if we're still alive in 40 years we'll be telling our descendants about the far flung past where civilians were allowed to own firearms. If you're willing to give them up without a fight you're not worthy of having them to begin with. 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Vance665 225 Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 My son will inherit my firearms one way or another. Giving up my familys God given right to self defense in not negotiable. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rhodes1968 1,638 Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 His internet access has been cut off, Zero Hedge is covering. It is possible. ...and he only has one way to get to the Web? Unlikely. Last I heard of he was holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy, so yes he is on a single provider. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
HB of CJ 1,263 Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 Does he have a satellite phone? Do his world wide Contacts and Confederates have specific timed instructions? This could get interesting. Timing is important. A "Thirteen Step" series of E-mails would be nice. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Vance665 225 Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 They are waiting to long anyway I hope everything does come out now. There is a ton of early voting going on this year and anything that might stop someone from voting for Hillary needs to be released. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
IndyArms 10,186 Posted October 20, 2016 Author Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 http://conservativebyte.com/2016/10/former-u-k-ambassador-visits-assange-and-comes-back-with-huge-info/ Just read this earlier...dated today...so who knows... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
David Mark 2,452 Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 I honestly have no hope for the future. By this time next year there will be no "gun culture" and if we're still alive in 40 years we'll be telling our descendants about the far flung past where civilians were allowed to own firearms. If you're willing to give them up without a fight you're not worthy of having them to begin with. Well said Sir! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
YOT 3,743 Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 (edited) I was reallty paraphrasing a long dead patriot, but it was very fitting. LOL, here, pick one... http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/gun-quotations-founding-fathers This is the one I was thinking of... “They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759 Edited October 21, 2016 by YOT 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDeko 792 Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 If there are large scale protests or another legal way to do so, sure. But I really don't want to spend every night afraid of a SWAT raid and I'm certainly not going to start shooting at cops if they come to enforce the law. I'm not getting my family killed or detained for harboring a fugitive from justice. Whatever it says about me I can't imagine becoming a cop-killer. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
saltydecimator 482 Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 well, its gonna go like this, the shooting is gonna already have started so its not gonna be like you are all beltway sniper on the boys in blue, its gonna be pretty cut and dry who the bad guys are, i think.... also, i dont think we gonna have a "small" revolution, its gonna be all in, lotta pent up emotions etc? so, is assange a rapist or was that just a smear tactic? also, i dont have alot of hope for the jay walking type voters that think snowden was a traitor.... the govt was doing illegal stuff, you told the people, you are a whistle blower or a hero, not a traitor, holy balls! prob is we are letting idtiots with bullhorns run the dialogue and narrative... we need some better solutions to the news and whatever deal, kinda like facebook but less socialist.... thi;nk how cool it woiuld be if the next big mass population tool thing was not run by a buncha hipppy commie buttholes?!?!? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
poolingmyignorance 2,191 Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 (edited) If there are large scale protests or another legal way to do so, sure. But I really don't want to spend every night afraid of a SWAT raid and I'm certainly not going to start shooting at cops if they come to enforce the law. I'm not getting my family killed or detained for harboring a fugitive from justice. Whatever it says about me I can't imagine becoming a cop-killer. And what about their violation to their oath? How is that not criminal? Since when do we pander to criminals and tyrants because they have pretty uniforms? Edited October 21, 2016 by poolingmyignorance 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rhodes1968 1,638 Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 We have entered a time where truth is despised hence the lack of effect the emails are having on the electorate, relative to what should be occurring. This class of person is not interested in truth any more than an ant is interested in Splenda. Lot of those types around and most are on the DNC side but not all by any means. Prepare for the worst, save some hope for better. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ronin38 2,117 Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 If there are large scale protests or another legal way to do so, sure. But I really don't want to spend every night afraid of a SWAT raid and I'm certainly not going to start shooting at cops if they come to enforce the law. I'm not getting my family killed or detained for harboring a fugitive from justice. Whatever it says about me I can't imagine becoming a cop-killer. And what about their violation to their oath? How is that not criminal? I'd say over half of the Congress-critters have violated their Oath of Office, many have done so multiple times. Not one charge or dismissal over any of it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Capt Nemo 882 Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 If there's a revolution, you're going to be a cop killer. They're the first line of .gov enforcement. Though If militias are raised, I'd hope they'd tell local departments, sheriffs, and state to stay out of it, and that their intended targets are federal only. If they do assist the fed, they will be targeted. We need them to continue to keep the criminals in their place. The big problem will be with criminals. They'll use any unrest as an excuse to kill, maime, and destroy, and they'll more than likely attack police. Militias will probably have to work with police to keep this crap to a minimum. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
poolingmyignorance 2,191 Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 https://youtu.be/6-3X5hIFXYU Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jerry52 893 Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 If there are large scale protests or another legal way to do so, sure. But I really don't want to spend every night afraid of a SWAT raid and I'm certainly not going to start shooting at cops if they come to enforce the law. I'm not getting my family killed or detained for harboring a fugitive from justice. Whatever it says about me I can't imagine becoming a cop-killer. And what about their violation to their oath? How is that not criminal? Since when do we pander to criminals and tyrants because they have pretty uniforms? What in the hell are you guys taking about? Violation! What violation? Cop killing? This talk is walking on the edge of this forum. Please stop it and get back to the topic Quote Link to post Share on other sites
poolingmyignorance 2,191 Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 (edited) If there are large scale protests or another legal way to do so, sure. But I really don't want to spend every night afraid of a SWAT raid and I'm certainly not going to start shooting at cops if they come to enforce the law. I'm not getting my family killed or detained for harboring a fugitive from justice. Whatever it says about me I can't imagine becoming a cop-killer. And what about their violation to their oath? How is that not criminal? Since when do we pander to criminals and tyrants because they have pretty uniforms? What in the hell are you guys taking about?Violation! What violation? Cop killing? This talk is walking on the edge of this forum. Please stop it and get back to the topic You miss understand. I'm saying those that would follow orders to disarm are not officers of the constitutional republic, but enemy combatants. Or are we to accept that police will obey unconstitutional orders and those who claim they would not obey them would support those who do. Either there is a line in the sand or there is not. Nobody is taking about killing cops. We're asking who will support those who dishonor their oath to protect our rights. Edited October 22, 2016 by poolingmyignorance 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jerry52 893 Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 I read cop killing Quote Link to post Share on other sites
poolingmyignorance 2,191 Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 I read cop killing Well if you take thar from my post it's only because you would support confiscation if ordered to, or suppory those who would. Is that what you're trying to express? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.