Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

F-35 dominates Red Flag 2017


  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

#1 Sim_Player

Sim_Player

    Top Member

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,209 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 03 March 2017 - 01:42 AM

It had a K/D Ratio of 15:1 up to close range, from what I understand, against F18s, F-15s, and F-16s
(I have also seen some claiming 20:0).

http://www.popularme...flag-war-games/

Trump just brought the price down a lot, with the promise to buy 90.
That's countering 1,350 enemy 4th generation aircraft.

I never understood the lack of support for cutting-edge aircraft (see what I did there?).

#2 ChileRelleno

ChileRelleno

    Man will ultimately be governed by God or by tyrants. Our choice

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,504 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sweet Home Alabama

Posted 03 March 2017 - 10:07 AM

The way I read it, it sounds like a great, if over priced, electronics warfare aircraft.
But still a shitty 'Fighter'.
Read, it has to be protected while others do the dirty work.
Ragnar Benson:
"Never, under any circumstances, ever become a refugee... Die if you must, but die on your home turf with your face to the wind, not in some stinking hellhole 2,000 kilometers away, among people you neither know nor care about."
Mihail Timofeevič Kalašnikov
:
"I am still ready to shake hands with anyone who designs a better assault rifle than mine.
USPA# 106617, D#24868, 600+ jumps in 42/50 states, 36 fixed & 6 rotary winged aircraft, Highest 28,000'-Lowest 1,500', Reserve Rides-5, Injuries-1... SKYDIVE!

#3 ChileRelleno

ChileRelleno

    Man will ultimately be governed by God or by tyrants. Our choice

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,504 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sweet Home Alabama

Posted 03 March 2017 - 10:13 AM

Aggressors being not only enemy fighters, but any type of threat, e.g. SAMs, radar and ECMs.
I also think they counted Kills made with their electronic assistance.
The story is slickly written to mislead about it's capabilities as a fighter.

Edited by ChileRelleno, 03 March 2017 - 10:17 AM.

  • Darth Saigus likes this
Ragnar Benson:
"Never, under any circumstances, ever become a refugee... Die if you must, but die on your home turf with your face to the wind, not in some stinking hellhole 2,000 kilometers away, among people you neither know nor care about."
Mihail Timofeevič Kalašnikov
:
"I am still ready to shake hands with anyone who designs a better assault rifle than mine.
USPA# 106617, D#24868, 600+ jumps in 42/50 states, 36 fixed & 6 rotary winged aircraft, Highest 28,000'-Lowest 1,500', Reserve Rides-5, Injuries-1... SKYDIVE!

#4 HB of CJ

HB of CJ

    Top Member

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,655 posts

Posted 03 March 2017 - 11:01 AM

Could the entire Red Flag 2017 exercise be gun decked?  Dunno.  How about a direct dog fight between stripped down "clean" F16s?  Or ... "clean" big engine F86s?  No external stuff.  Guns only.  Knife range.  Humm.  Could we be coming too electronically oriented with dog fighting?  What would happen after a really big coronal mass ejection, (CME) from the sun or a really big enemy action orbital EMP?  What then?  Would/could the F35 even start?  Could the air force version even land on a carrier?  Duhh.  Another point of view only.

 

Respectfully.  Not a F35 fan.  The problem, not the solution.  The military industrial complex.  Me only.


Edited by HB of CJ, 03 March 2017 - 11:03 AM.


#5 G O B

G O B

    Grumpy Old Bastard

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,970 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cen TX

Posted 03 March 2017 - 11:18 AM

A fleet of $$$$$$ air superiority fighters is all well and good. However we still need a BUNCH of cheap recon/ground attack/ infantry support planes.

German WWII tanks had a HUGE advantage in kill ratios, BUT we had thousands of the damned death traps! A 50>1 kill ratio does NOT win against 1,000> numerical superiority!

F-35, F-22 = great aircraft. BUT we need some that do not cost $35,000 an hour to fly!


  • HB of CJ likes this

Freelance Philosopher and Professor Emeritus, School of Hard Knocks and Sharp Blows to the Head

Be yourself, for if you are NOT yourself, then who the hell are you?

"so is the soap they use to brainwash you environmentally safe?" (Bucky Katt)


#6 Sim_Player

Sim_Player

    Top Member

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,209 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 04 March 2017 - 01:59 AM

Aggressors being not only enemy fighters, but any type of threat, e.g. SAMs, radar and ECMs.
I also think they counted Kills made with their electronic assistance.
The story is slickly written to mislead about it's capabilities as a fighter.

If they counted shared kills, I don't think the generals would have been having an orgasm on video (I didn't form my opinion from one article).

Warfare is always changing.

Advanced RADAR tech basically won WW2, thanks to the Brits. We put RADAR on land, ships, subs, aircraft, and even bombs.

New technology is always expensive.

The Israelis have a Lear-size jet that creates it's own stealth profile on enemy RADAR.

It makes sense that they want to buy F-35s and modify the software.

I flew combat flight sims for about 15 years. Altitude and speed beat more maneuverable fighters, almost every time.

Tactics matter.

Edited by Sim_Player, 04 March 2017 - 02:01 AM.


#7 sjgusmc21

sjgusmc21

    Citizen

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,211 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Antonio, Texas!

Posted 04 March 2017 - 07:28 AM

A fleet of $$$$$$ air superiority fighters is all well and good. However we still need a BUNCH of cheap recon/ground attack/ infantry support planes.

German WWII tanks had a HUGE advantage in kill ratios, BUT we had thousands of the damned death traps! A 50>1 kill ratio does NOT win against 1,000> numerical superiority!

F-35, F-22 = great aircraft. BUT we need some that do not cost $35,000 an hour to fly!

 

You Sir are correct.

 

Germany  learned this in WWII.  Their tanks were hardened and mostly superior, but, were greatly out numbered.  In this case, quality over quantity lost. 



#8 patriot

patriot

    Pro Patria Vigilans. Verbum Vincet

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,614 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:PA

Posted 04 March 2017 - 07:51 AM

 

Aggressors being not only enemy fighters, but any type of threat, e.g. SAMs, radar and ECMs.
I also think they counted Kills made with their electronic assistance.
The story is slickly written to mislead about it's capabilities as a fighter.

If they counted shared kills, I don't think the generals would have been having an orgasm on video (I didn't form my opinion from one article).

Warfare is always changing.

Advanced RADAR tech basically won WW2, thanks to the Brits. We put RADAR on land, ships, subs, aircraft, and even bombs.

New technology is always expensive.

The Israelis have a Lear-size jet that creates it's own stealth profile on enemy RADAR.

It makes sense that they want to buy F-35s and modify the software.

I flew combat flight sims for about 15 years. Altitude and speed beat more maneuverable fighters, almost every time.

Tactics matter.

 

...a bit of history for you;

https://en.wikipedia...istory_of_radar


Fighting for your rights whether you deserve them or not. Pro Patria Vigilans
"The strength of the Constitution lies entirely in the determination of each citizen to defend it. Only if every single citizen feels duty bound to do his share in this defense are constitutional rights secure." Albert Einstein ...remember the Four BoxesJames 1:25
Tromix.....The best Saiga 12 you could buy. 


#9 Ronin38

Ronin38

    Top Member

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,456 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 04 March 2017 - 10:18 AM

A fleet of $$$$$$ air superiority fighters is all well and good. However we still need a BUNCH of cheap recon/ground attack/ infantry support planes.

German WWII tanks had a HUGE advantage in kill ratios, BUT we had thousands of the damned death traps! A 50>1 kill ratio does NOT win against 1,000> numerical superiority!

F-35, F-22 = great aircraft. BUT we need some that do not cost $35,000 an hour to fly!

 

Maybe a fleet of these?  A-29 Super Tacano.  :up:

 


"I used to think it was awful that life was so unfair. Then I thought, 'wouldn't it be much worse if life *were* fair, and all the terrible things that happen to us come because we actually deserve them?' So now I take great comfort in the general hostility and unfairness of the universe."  -Marcus Cole

#10 Zombieland

Zombieland

    Member

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 97 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 March 2017 - 04:27 PM

Super Tucano sounds like something someone would order from Taco Bell. I would like a big beef burito, 29 super tucanos, an order of cheesy fiesta potatoes and a large baja blast mountain dew please.
  • HB of CJ likes this

"She will say anything and change nothing" It's time to turn the page. Paid for by Obama for America.biggrin.png 


#11 Ronin38

Ronin38

    Top Member

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,456 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 04 March 2017 - 05:37 PM

New Slogan: A-29 Super Tacano- More punch than a burrito from Taco Bell!  :D


"I used to think it was awful that life was so unfair. Then I thought, 'wouldn't it be much worse if life *were* fair, and all the terrible things that happen to us come because we actually deserve them?' So now I take great comfort in the general hostility and unfairness of the universe."  -Marcus Cole

#12 Capt Nemo

Capt Nemo

    Citizen

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,714 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oshkosh, WI

Posted 07 March 2017 - 10:22 PM

We need fighters that are cheap and by the thousands.  I'm so sic of the MIC bullshit about how having this one fighter is worth an entire WWII air wing.  That air wing could cause 10,000 times the damage that that one fighter can.

 

Look at the F22 vs. the F15.  The F22 carries 4 missiles internal plus the gun.  The F15 8 missiles + bombs, or add a few more missiles, and then the gun.  Who's going to stay in the fight longer?

 

The same is true between the A10 and F16.  The A10 can carry a bomb load that the F16 couldn't even leave the ground with.

 

And every time they buy a shiny new toy, the force gets cut that much more!  Didn't we learn our lesson from GWII?  We need the real boots on the ground to win a battle, not some shiny expensive little toy!

 

What we need is about 1-2000 of the F20 Tigershark.  The old F5 airframe could match the F16, but the F5 was underpowered.  With the F20 design, the F5 could finally match the F16 at half the cost.


  • Netpackrat likes this

#13 sjgusmc21

sjgusmc21

    Citizen

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,211 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Antonio, Texas!

Posted 08 March 2017 - 06:44 AM

Remember, it isn't the machine, but the operator.  That is what got our asses initially kicked in the air at the beginning of the Vietnam War.  Pilots were not trained for dog fighting...it was a 'thing' of the past, despite very experienced and senior pilots protesting against it. 

 

I have no doubt that the F35 is a great plane.  But at what cost?  I GUARANTEE that a plane, just as superior, could be built for half the cost.  But with kick-backs, over inflation of cost estimates, congressional pork/favors, it will not happen.



#14 Mullet Man

Mullet Man

    Top Member

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,909 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Land of the F.O.I.D.

Posted 08 March 2017 - 09:21 AM

https://youtu.be/8y06NSBBRtY

Only difference is that it's not new anymore, now it's deeply rooted.

Are you a resident of Illinois? Join www.Illinoiscarry.com

 

Items for sale...http://forum.saiga-1...-vepr12-and-ak/


#15 DLT

DLT

    Top Member

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,695 posts

Posted 08 March 2017 - 12:35 PM

The F20 was the plane we needed and deserved. But the contractors and top brass were so in love with their F16 that they couldn't see what was obvious to everyone else. I think it's interesting that it would come up here because only week ago I was telling my son about that plane.
Deep South Texas

#16 Capt Nemo

Capt Nemo

    Citizen

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,714 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oshkosh, WI

Posted 08 March 2017 - 10:46 PM

Remember, it isn't the machine, but the operator.  That is what got our asses initially kicked in the air at the beginning of the Vietnam War.  Pilots were not trained for dog fighting...it was a 'thing' of the past, despite very experienced and senior pilots protesting against it. 

 

I have no doubt that the F35 is a great plane.  But at what cost?  I GUARANTEE that a plane, just as superior, could be built for half the cost.  But with kick-backs, over inflation of cost estimates, congressional pork/favors, it will not happen.

True on that!

 

When my father was at Ft. Sill, he got to talk with a Rockwell radar tech. (Dad also worked for Rockwell)  The tech told him about the overrun problem on the new fire control radar being fielded.  They start out with a damn good radar, and go into production.  Then the Army wants to add some new features, so production stops and things get retooled and A model starts rolling.  The Army then wants even newer features, so production stops again.  B model starts rolling, and on and on.....  This constant start and stop crap is what drives up the costs.  If they'd just build the whole run without stop, there would be no overruns.

 

I think the F5 was a damn pretty airframe!  That plane just looks fast!  Too bad they underpowered it!



#17 Netpackrat

Netpackrat

    Raw Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,314 posts
  • Location:Anchorage, AK

Posted 09 March 2017 - 03:29 AM

One of the great things about the F-5 was that Northrop developed it on their own dime.  Imagine that today!



#18 {ROS}_me

{ROS}_me

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 134 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 January 2018 - 12:42 PM



#19 patriot

patriot

    Pro Patria Vigilans. Verbum Vincet

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,614 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:PA

Posted 10 January 2018 - 02:54 PM

 

A fleet of $$$$$$ air superiority fighters is all well and good. However we still need a BUNCH of cheap recon/ground attack/ infantry support planes.

German WWII tanks had a HUGE advantage in kill ratios, BUT we had thousands of the damned death traps! A 50>1 kill ratio does NOT win against 1,000> numerical superiority!

F-35, F-22 = great aircraft. BUT we need some that do not cost $35,000 an hour to fly!

 

Maybe a fleet of these?  A-29 Super Tacano.  032.gif

 

 

since this thread got bumped back up......

Looks like a trainer to me.....


Fighting for your rights whether you deserve them or not. Pro Patria Vigilans
"The strength of the Constitution lies entirely in the determination of each citizen to defend it. Only if every single citizen feels duty bound to do his share in this defense are constitutional rights secure." Albert Einstein ...remember the Four BoxesJames 1:25
Tromix.....The best Saiga 12 you could buy. 


#20 G O B

G O B

    Grumpy Old Bastard

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,970 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cen TX

Posted 11 January 2018 - 03:42 PM

Too WW II !   I would like to see a 'current tech' Re-do of the Warthog.


  • patriot and {ROS}_me like this

Freelance Philosopher and Professor Emeritus, School of Hard Knocks and Sharp Blows to the Head

Be yourself, for if you are NOT yourself, then who the hell are you?

"so is the soap they use to brainwash you environmentally safe?" (Bucky Katt)


#21 Capt Nemo

Capt Nemo

    Citizen

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,714 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oshkosh, WI

Posted 12 January 2018 - 10:49 PM

Just remember, some of that WW II tech could provide surprises on a modern battlefield.  A stinger missile cannot lock on a piston aircraft as it's too cool for the IR sensor! 

 

I wouldn't mind seeing a B24 ground attack plane.  Vulcans fore and aft, and 48 hellfires in the bomb bay.  And if the engines are trimmed right, they could chew you up before you could hear them.



#22 G O B

G O B

    Grumpy Old Bastard

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,970 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cen TX

Posted 13 January 2018 - 08:34 AM

We need a modernized attack plane. High sub sonic cruise speed, and the loiter ability to 'play all day'. Needs to be at LEAST as tough as the warthog, and have the ability to shoot down /jam drones and survive in congested urban environments.   


  • patriot likes this

Freelance Philosopher and Professor Emeritus, School of Hard Knocks and Sharp Blows to the Head

Be yourself, for if you are NOT yourself, then who the hell are you?

"so is the soap they use to brainwash you environmentally safe?" (Bucky Katt)


#23 patriot

patriot

    Pro Patria Vigilans. Verbum Vincet

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,614 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:PA

Posted 13 January 2018 - 10:22 AM

We need a modernized attack plane. High sub sonic cruise speed, and the loiter ability to 'play all day'. Needs to be at LEAST as tough as the warthog, and have the ability to shoot down /jam drones and survive in congested urban environments.   

Good summary. The A10 is an amazingly survivable platform. It's a tall order. I say we keep the GAU-8, and the titanium cockpit. Build around that. Multiple hardpoints for external payloads. State of the art electronics/avionics, with HUD (built with ease of use in mind, not the overly complex mess we have in some aircraft), EM hardened. Propulsion? Jet, prop, antigrav, I don't care. ...and MAKE SURE you can communicate with the warfighters on the ground.


  • G O B likes this

Fighting for your rights whether you deserve them or not. Pro Patria Vigilans
"The strength of the Constitution lies entirely in the determination of each citizen to defend it. Only if every single citizen feels duty bound to do his share in this defense are constitutional rights secure." Albert Einstein ...remember the Four BoxesJames 1:25
Tromix.....The best Saiga 12 you could buy. 


#24 G O B

G O B

    Grumpy Old Bastard

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,970 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cen TX

Posted 14 January 2018 - 06:58 PM

And make the damn thing EASY TO FIX AND MAINTAIN!!!   No more weapons that need 10 hours maintenance to work for 2 hours!


  • patriot likes this

Freelance Philosopher and Professor Emeritus, School of Hard Knocks and Sharp Blows to the Head

Be yourself, for if you are NOT yourself, then who the hell are you?

"so is the soap they use to brainwash you environmentally safe?" (Bucky Katt)


#25 GunFun

GunFun

    Apparently, guy who has made way too many posts.

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,477 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington

Posted 19 January 2018 - 01:29 PM

and make me 2" taller!



#26 sjgusmc21

sjgusmc21

    Citizen

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,211 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Antonio, Texas!

Posted 19 January 2018 - 03:26 PM

and make me 2" longer!  :)


  • Gaddis likes this

#27 Gaddis

Gaddis

    Squeeze my lemon 'till the juice runs down my leg

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,188 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 January 2018 - 07:00 PM

and make me 2" longer!  smile.png

Dammit, now you got this stuck in my head. mad.giflaugh.png

 

 

 

Dag nab it, they cut out best line at the end where Campbell says "your mothers been telling stories about me again" to Hamish. mad.gif

 

And how come Firefox seems to really suck lately when it comes to cutting and pasting in links and shit? :angry2:


Edited by Gaddis, 19 January 2018 - 07:14 PM.

"Right On, Vas"





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users