Jump to content

922 compliance

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Yes. It is the piston. This is it's function, and the named part that it counts as under 922r analysis.


Formerly, the part that would be a piston on a normal AK was not counted, and was considered to be part of the carrier. Now after a moron wrote a redundant letter, they count that part as an "operating rod"

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Chatbox

    Load More
    You don't have permission to chat.
  • Create New...