rdhanded2

or 13?

Every person I talk to "knows the law for sure" and quotes it different. I even called Tapco and spoke to them. They stated that the pistol grip counts as a U.S. part. I told them that the gun is not imported with a grip so adding one counts against it. The gentle man stated then that the grip is stamped U.S.A. so it is a mute point and it cancels itself out, you are back to zero. I told him Brownells is selling the part and advertising it as 2 922r compliance parts, which the Tapco spokesperson stated, "yes that is correct, counts as 2 compliance parts." WTF!

I agree with you, and that is how I have read it. The problem is there are so many places out there giving conflicting answers. http://www.brownells.com/.aspx/pid=27423/Product/SAIGA_INTRAFUSE_STOCK_PISTOL_GRIP_KIT This shows that this kit counts for 2 u.s. parts, which I believe to be wrong. http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/AKS509-6.html The same kit, and it does not state that it counts for 922r compliance. Any other part on their site that counts is listed as counting for compliance. This one does not because they cancel each other out I would say. Not trying to b

I just showed this thread to someone who has built a couple of these. We have been discussing 922r. He says the o.p. is wrong. He states if you add a pistol grip, and it is made in the u.s. it counts as a u.s. part. I agreed with the o.p. and thought it brought the count up to 15 no matter where it is made since the gun was not imported with the stock. What is the consensus on this? I have been all over the net reading and have read it both ways.