Saiga for hunting?
#1
Posted 03 November 2009 - 07:58 PM
1. Will the AK/7.62x 39 match a Marlin .30-30 in the practical accuracy department for the intended use (Plinking/Hunting hogs & deer 0-200yrds)? I know this gun is branded a "hunting" rifle by the Russians, but is it a viable choice when compared to a .30-30?
2. My concern with doing a PG conversion is, although it is legal (With bullet-button or MM Grip) it may elicit not so friendly attention from uninformed game wardens and law enforcement. Are my concerns unfounded? And am I at a huge disadvantage if I leave the carbine unconverted?
I just want to make sure I'm getting the best weapon (value) for the money. I was considering a 5.56 mini-14 or Saiga but I like the extra punch and I won't be doing longer-range hunting with this carbine (for that I have a .270). Also, I can't believe how expensive Mini-14's have gotten. Overall, this firearm will be a plinker(defense if necesary)and a hunting "brush" gun.
Regards from Wine Country,
Peter
#2
Posted 03 November 2009 - 08:48 PM
I am not familiar with the accuracy of a Marlin .30-30, but both of the Saiga 7.62x39's that I own(ed), at their best, did about 2.5" groups at 100 yards. From everything I read, the ballistic performance of the rounds is similar - the .30-30 round initially got a little more punch to it, but the 7.62x39 mm round compensates for that with its more aerodynamically shaped bullet.
I took a deer with my Saiga (equipped with the Russian skeleton stock and a 4x24 illuminated reticle POSP scope) last Fall. Fired a Silver Bear 123 gr soft-point round from about 70 yards and hit it in the shoulder. It ran for about 25 yards, fell, kicked around for about ten second and died. The internal damage was pretty horrific. The bullet almost completely shattered the shoulder bone (I didn't have to cut through the bone to get the leg off when butchering the meat), sending multiple fragments into the lungs and made an ugly, golf ball-sized exit hole on the other side. For some reason, there practically wasn't any blood from either hole. The deer did bleed quite a bit from its snout though. I trust my Saiga as a deer gun for up to about 150... maybe 200 yards. I remember reading that at 200 yards, a 7.62x39 mm bullet still has about twice the amount of kinetic energy of a P+ 9 mm bullet exiting the muzzle.
This post has been edited by SpetsnazGRU: 03 November 2009 - 08:51 PM
#3
Posted 03 November 2009 - 10:08 PM
Game wardens are going to be a big variable good luck and stay LEGAL. Make sure you have a 5 round mag not just 5 rds in a 30 rd mag, that's important in some states.
#4
Posted 04 November 2009 - 03:28 AM
#5
Posted 04 November 2009 - 11:08 AM
some will hit 2 or 3 inches at 100 meters, one was a put all over bullets, cant hit the side of a barn with it and one was like 1.5 inch at 100 meters
but must did 2 to 3 inches like I say before, when you buy a saiga you may get the cant hit the side of a barn with it or the one that can put
holes in a 2 inch at 100 meters, all in all the saiga rifles are robust and will take abuse no other gun can take, will digest about any ammo out there
and ask for more, with a good red dot or scope things can change a lot that with iron sights. The use of 5 round mags let you empty the gun in no time
and reload it in no time ( I use chicon 5 rounds ) as in my state sometimes you have to empty the gun when you walk on a road even if is
in the middle of no were when you hunt.
Don't take me wrong I love lever actions gun and love a good 30-30 marlin but all in all for all around and
don't worry gun the saiga will be the one as it can be mod in no time to take high cap mags if things
do go bad and have to use it for more than hunt , the gun is and all purpose gun but like all purpose gun
you will don't have the accuracy of a lever or bolt action gun, but you have the easy reload and fire power
you may need one day.
Any way I sound like a sales man, but is really you choice and what you want to do.
Good luck with what you get and enjoy the gun you get as that is the important thing about getting a gun.
That's not true.
I have the heart of a kind and gentle soul...
in a jar on my desk.
No man is a match for a woman's tears.
When in need! Use and RPG……
If you've got them by the balls, their hearts and minds will follow.
Not everything that can be counted counts and not everything that counts can be counted.
I don't care what people say as long as I get what I want.
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
"One of the most horrible features of war is that all the war-propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are not fighting."
—George Orwell, Homage to Catalonia, 1938
I CAN HAVE THE WEAPON I REALLY ALWAYS WANTED !!!! I DO IT MY SELF,
WHY!!!!!! BECAUSE I CAN, CAN YOU?????

#6
Posted 04 November 2009 - 01:45 PM
Petri317, on 03 November 2009 - 06:58 PM, said:
An unconverted Saiga is not a bad thing at all. If I ever decide to pick up a Saiga in .308 or something, I might just leave it as is. Probably the most important difference would be the stock trigger, IMO.
California game wardens are absolutely an issue, I'm told. They are prone to shit bricks when they see a guy skulking around the woods with a Kalashnikov loaded with 30 rounds of rock'n'roll. If it were me, I would leave it unconverted for now. It is still a great gun.
#7
Posted 04 November 2009 - 03:00 PM
JanusthePhoenix, on 04 November 2009 - 10:45 AM, said:
Petri317, on 03 November 2009 - 06:58 PM, said:
An unconverted Saiga is not a bad thing at all. If I ever decide to pick up a Saiga in .308 or something, I might just leave it as is. Probably the most important difference would be the stock trigger, IMO.
California game wardens are absolutely an issue, I'm told. They are prone to shit bricks when they see a guy skulking around the woods with a Kalashnikov loaded with 30 rounds of rock'n'roll. If it were me, I would leave it unconverted for now. It is still a great gun.
Dude ive heard they tripout with anything over 5 rounds in CA if you're hunting, so even the 10 rounders need not apply in the CA hunting world...
#8
Posted 04 November 2009 - 06:19 PM
#9
Posted 04 November 2009 - 10:10 PM
The other thing I'm debating is .223 vs. 7.62x39. Although for (future) standard-capacity mag availability, I think 7.62x39 wins.
This post has been edited by Petri317: 04 November 2009 - 10:12 PM
#10
Posted 06 November 2009 - 01:58 AM
I own both a 30-30 winchester and a saiga and would hunt with both of them. At 100 yards my 30-30 is more accurate, but the saiga is well within hunting standards and I wouldn't hesitate to hunt with it. That being said, 200 yards may be pushing it. If I was hunting with my saiga and a deer came out 200 yards I would definitely take a shot, but if I was expecting to be taking shots around 200 yards I would use a different gun. Out to 150 yards either saiga or 30-30. At 200 yards my 30-30 has the edge. That being said, the saiga is a hell of a lot more fun to shoot and in any self-defense/SHTF scenario, it is far superior to a lever action gun.
#12
Posted 07 November 2009 - 11:00 AM
i would get them both....
DSC01364.JPG (104.73K)
Number of downloads: 1
#14
Posted 07 November 2009 - 04:06 PM
As to the idea of getting both a saiga and a lever-gun, I guess I could splurge, but then I'd either go with a .223 Saiga and .30-30, or a 7.62x39 saiga and a .45-70 lever-gun.
#15
Posted 08 November 2009 - 02:02 AM
Petri317, on 04 November 2009 - 08:10 PM, said:
+1
I agree.
Also, thank you for accurately referring to 30-round 7.62x39 mags as standard capacity, which they of course are.
This post has been edited by post-apocalyptic: 08 November 2009 - 02:02 AM
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
#17
Posted 10 November 2009 - 11:21 AM
Sign In
Register
Help

MultiQuote







