That's an easy question to answer.....
VICENTE FOX and his bitch Jorge W.

Guido2 in Houston

Did your college professor tell you to say that, guido?

Seems like Jorge W. (as you like to call him) is one of the only few in Washington who support putting up the big fence.

After all, if not for all of the illegals (and the Chicago dead who still show up at the polls to cast their Mayor Richard Dailey votes), where would the Dems get most of their voting base?

...as Da Mayor Daley used to say, "Vote early and vote often......"

Seems its gotten so easy to bash Bush........ Try to resist the easy impulse, and wait for the real shit to start when the Democrats (Heaven Forbid) take over.......................... Let's wait the last 2 years of Bush's term before we condemn him......... if indeed its deserved even then........

Sadly, Pres. Bush is not a big proponent of building a fence. He is supporting amnesty over the objections of many in the Republican party. He is following the house Republicans in their call for the intintial 700 miles of fencing to be built only through major grassroots pressure. He is more in line with the Senate which is pro-amnesty. The reality though is that NONE of the fence is going to be built under demoncratic "leadership". Even though already approved this new congress will not fund it... watch the fence not happen despite overwhelming public support (including legal immigrants). Bottom line Pres. Bush is not extremely interested in stopping illegal immigration; however, he is 100% better than his lib counterparts and is completely dedicated to fighting the war on terror. On National defense, war on terror, and illegal immigration, he is light years ahead of the party of leftists- the demoncrats.

+1 on that..........

Really...I hate to see the dems get back in control......fact of the matter is the more I here and see of the republicas the more they look like the dems and visa versa. Bottom line....all of them on the hill are bunch of self serving elitist.

Ditto that, AKOK-

Maybe I'm just picky, but I actually expect my elected representatives to REPRESENT the legal (read: "American citizens") voters' preferences.

I agree that Jorge W. is doing a good job with security abroad, but at the same time, he's turning a blind eye to those taking over our country domestically.

You think "cut and run" does a disservice to those who have valiantly served overseas, and are there now? Wait 'till they (finally) come home and realize "our" country is not really "ours" anymore, cause a pussy in the oval office (and in government in general) have given it away.

I agree that the Dem's would likely do worse, but that petty party politics crap is a smokescreen. They do not give a dry fart about any of us, be they on either side of the aisle.

Bottom line is, we don't really have much control of "our" country anymore. And "our" elected representation is a sick joke. They are all worthless.

Allowing a discussion of our lack of realistic representation to degenerate into "Dem's vs. Republicans" is just playing into the design. Step outside the party politics box and make an accounting of what any of them are doing FOR you, vs. what they are doing TO you.
They are all slingin' the meat to the working, taxpaying, legitimate non-criminal element of the Country. The beneficiaries are the illegals, slackers, and thugs.

Fuck two-party politics, let's think about the future of our country. Are we sheep, or are we free-thinking, freedom-loving citizens of a "free" republic?

Time to "get the woman out of ourselves" and think like men!

Respectfully posted,

Guido2 in Houston