Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Great day for OHIO! grassroots baby!!
forum.Saiga-12.com > WELCOME > General Discussion - Any topic is welcome here!!!
Pointer
We finaly but the boot up ex Gov Tafts ass 032.gif
How stupid was it to have a concealed carry permit and yet have to have it in plain site while in your car? Freakin
tard he was.Citys drop the assault weapons ban also 027.gif

Hidden guns for motorists will be allowed under new Ohio law to start Wednesday
Tuesday, March 13, 2007
By JOHN McCARTHY
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER

COLUMBUS A revision to Ohio's 3-year-old law allowing people to carry hidden guns takes effect on Wednesday. Here are some questions and answers on the new regulations:

Q: What are the big changes taking effect Wednesday?

A: One change is that motorists with permits to carry concealed guns will be able to do so in their cars and trucks. Previously, the guns had to be either locked up or in plain sight of a law-enforcement officer approaching a car. The other major change is the law wipes out local gun-control ordinances in cities such as Cincinnati, Cleveland and Columbus, which all had banned possession of assault rifles.

Q: Didn't former Gov. Bob Taft veto the bill that makes the changes?

A: Yes. But the Legislature provided the only override of a Taft veto in his eight years as governor.

Q: Why did the Legislature feel it necessary to allow people to carry hidden guns in their cars and trucks?

A: Lawmakers, prodded by gun-rights advocates, said the law was inconsistent in allowing permit-holders to carry hidden guns on the street but not in their cars.

Q: What do law-enforcement agencies think about guns hidden in cars?

A: Some law-enforcement agencies were opposed to the provision because of concerns about officers' safety or were officially neutral.

Q: Besides the ban on assault weapons, what other local laws will be wiped off the books?

A: Several communities had banned concealed weapons in parks, playgrounds and other areas.

Q: What was the reasoning behind that change?

A: The National Rifle Association and other proponents of getting rid of those community regulations say the state had a patchwork of local gun laws that varied among communities. A person traveling through the state could be obeying the law in one place but breaking it in the next town.

Q: Are the cities and towns going to challenge the law?

A: Several communities, including Cleveland, have said they would, but none has taken action yet.

Q: Will journalists still be able to get lists of permit-holders from the county sheriffs who issue them?

A: No. Under a separate bill, sheriffs will be prohibited from releasing the lists, beginning April 8, but journalists will be allowed to see the names. They won't be allowed to copy them. The lists have never been open to the general public.

Q: Are lawmakers done tinkering with the 2004 law?

A: Not likely. Rep. Jim Aslanides, a Coshocton Republican who sponsored the original law, said it may be tweaked again because sheriffs have questions about whether they can legally show the lists of names of permit-holders to journalists.

On the Net:

Concealed Weapons changes:

www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID126-HB-0347
brain3278
Go Ohio!
DHunter
Congrats!
Enjoy your newly recovered freedoms to the fullest. biggrin.gif
G O B
Good news! The battle is in the states. Win the states and the feds will drop their BS too.
LOOSE the states and the feds will feel they need to go even further.
uzitiger
Finally we can thank G-d that normal gun legislation has been passed in Ohio. This is great news in the light of what residents of other states have to deal with. I saw what is being proposed in Illinois and I hope some of the gun makers relocate out of that state since they will be making guns illegal to own in the state that makes them. I also would love to see gun makers in Massachusetts and Commiefornia move out of their states to pro gun states where we have decent governors instead of 'girlie men' like Arnold Schwartzenegger who made millions in gun toting movies but acts like a member of the Kennedy clan when he bans .50 caliber guns in his state.
rocinante
I like Ohio people. You know how there are lost tribes of Israel? I think you guys got the same attitudes and good sense that made it down south. Easiest yankees of all to get along with. Maybe your ancestors just made a right turn at the end of the appalachians and went north.
G O B
Arnold IS a member of the Kennedy clan . He is married into it .
Mike Davidson
QUOTE (rocinante @ Mar 17 2007, 07:33 PM) *
I like Ohio people. You know how there are lost tribes of Israel? I think you guys got the same attitudes and good sense that made it down south. Easiest yankees of all to get along with. Maybe your ancestors just made a right turn at the end of the appalachians and went north.

Most Ohioans ancestors are from the south. I am very glad for this passing. It is really more than stated. It is a law that makes it illegal for a city in the state to pass any laws that are stricter than the state law. If it is legal to the state of Ohio, it is legal anywhere in the state of Ohio. I really think that this should go to the federal level.. I feel that it should be illegal for any state to pass a law that says something about a firearm is illegal that the federal government says is legal. After all, the 2nd is a federal law and federal gun laws should trump state gun laws. I don't think a state has the right to pass it's own gun laws. It is a federal right and should stay that way. This would make California, NY........ free of their bullshit unconstitutional laws. If it is legal to the feds it is legal to the whole country. That's the way it should be. All should have the right to own nfa item, high capacity mags, pistols , rifles....... because the feds says it is. I would vote for it in a second for all our bros in the hate states. Wouldn't it be great to see such people to tell their state to kiss there ass and buy a machinegun!!!
G O B
The right to own weapons (not just "firearms") predates the USA, and the court has ruled that. They also recognized it as an individual right.

The first branch of the US armed forces was the USMC. They were assigned to Privateers. (privatly owned WARSHIPS).
If weapons -up to and including warships were not in private hands, where the hell did those ships come from,

AND


WHAT was their "sporting purpose"?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.