Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Witch Hunt Against Gun Owers
forum.Saiga-12.com > WELCOME > General Discussion - Any topic is welcome here!!!
Racegal20
The Witch Hunt Against Gun Owners
By Michelle Malkin
Wednesday, March 21, 2007

"The Second Amendment," Charlton Heston used to say, "is America's first freedom." The Second secures the rest.

It's a message narcissistic journalists need to hear again. A decade ago, Heston chastised the media in a National Press Club speech for its collective ignorance, apathy and open hostility toward gun owners' rights: "Clearly, too many have used freedom of the press as a weapon not only to strangle our free speech, but to erode and ultimately destroy the right to keep and bear arms as well. In doing so you promoted your profession to that of constitutional judge and jury, more powerful even than our Supreme Court, more prejudiced than the Inquisition's tribunals. It is a frightening misuse of constitutional privilege, and I pray that you will come to your senses and see that these abuses are curbed."

Alas, Heston's prayers have yet to be answered. While courts have recently bolstered Second Amendment rights, endangering gun owners in the name of free speech continues to be the blood sport of the Fourth Estate.

Two weeks ago, the Roanoke (Va.) Times published an online database of registered concealed handgun permit holders in the paper's community under the sanctimonious guise of "Sunshine Week." The database included both the names and street addresses of some 135,000 Virginians with permits to carry concealed weapons. Columnist Christian Trejbal patted himself on the back for making it easy to snoop on the neighbors: "I can hear the shocked indignation of gun-toters already: It's nobody's business but mine if I want to pack heat. Au contraire. Because the government handles the permitting, it is everyone's business."

Trejbal denied that compiling the concealed carry permit holders list was "about being for or against guns." But he exposed his true agenda when he compared law-abiding gun owners to . . . sex offenders: "A state that eagerly puts sex offender data online complete with an interactive map could easily do the same with gun permits, but it does not."

The Roanoke Times showed reckless disregard for the safety of the license holders and reckless disregard for accuracy. In his column, Trejbal admitted that he knew some of the information he had obtained was inaccurate -- but published it anyway: "As a Sunshine Week gift, The Roanoke Times has placed the entire database, mistakes and all [emphasis added], online at www.roanoke.com/gunpermits. You can search to find out if neighbors, carpool partners, elected officials or anyone else has permission to carry a gun."

After an uproar among gun-owners, including domestic violence victims licensed to carry, the Times finally decided to yank the database. Trejbal seems not to feel much remorse: "Did we make it easier [to obtain the information]? Yes. But it's still a public record." Let's review: He published a list he knew contained inaccuracies. His paper admits the decision endangered gun owners. He compiled a convenient shopping list for criminals -- and smacked law-abiding gun owners in the face with his comparison of their choice to exercise their rights with sex offenders.

Public disclosure of concealed carry licenses varies from state to state. Eighteen states protect permit holders' privacy from public view. Virginia is one of 17 states that make licensee records public. If information is public, does it make it right for a newspaper to publish it? The media exercise discretion all the time in withholding the names of minors or rape victims. Why should the privacy of law-abiding concealed handgun permit holders be treated with any less concern?

While the Roanoake Times has retreated, the witch hunt against gun owners continues. In New York City, Mayor Michael Bloomberg launched a "sting" operation targeting gun shops in five states for allegedly selling guns illegally. Alan Gottlieb and Dave Workman of the Second Amendment Foundation report that Bloomberg sent unauthorized private investigators to conduct the operation -- without notifying the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF):

"The odor ripened when Bloomberg filed civil lawsuits against these gun shops, rather than turn over evidence to the proper authorities for criminal prosecution. Bloomberg's office refused to turn over that evidence, and instead the billionaire mayor launched a high-profile media campaign demonizing the targeted gun shop operators."

Bloomberg has, of course, earned the praise of the anti-Second Amendment media for his security-undermining stunt. The unholy alliance between Big Nanny politicians and journalists threatens us all.




Michelle Malkin makes news and waves with a unique combination of investigative journalism and incisive commentary. She is the author of Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild .

Be the first to read Michelle Malkin's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.


İCreators Syndicate
The Witch Hunt Against Gun Owners
By Michelle Malkin
Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Send an email to Michelle Malkin Email It
Print It
Take Action
Read Article & Comments (174) Trackbacks Post Your Comments

"The Second Amendment," Charlton Heston used to say, "is America's first freedom." The Second secures the rest.

It's a message narcissistic journalists need to hear again. A decade ago, Heston chastised the media in a National Press Club speech for its collective ignorance, apathy and open hostility toward gun owners' rights: "Clearly, too many have used freedom of the press as a weapon not only to strangle our free speech, but to erode and ultimately destroy the right to keep and bear arms as well. In doing so you promoted your profession to that of constitutional judge and jury, more powerful even than our Supreme Court, more prejudiced than the Inquisition's tribunals. It is a frightening misuse of constitutional privilege, and I pray that you will come to your senses and see that these abuses are curbed."



Forgings from the first cut of a .44 Magnum handgun are piled in a bin at the Smith & Wesson factory in Springfield, Tuesday, Dec. 19, 2006. The .44 Magnum is the handgun made famous in Clint Eastwood's "Dirty Harry" movie. Mike Golden, Smith & Wesson's CEO for the past two years, has targeted new technologies and sales to the military and police departments to ensure the company's future. Smith & Wesson's earnings have seen double-digit growth since Golden took over. (AP Photo/Charles Krupa) Alas, Heston's prayers have yet to be answered. While courts have recently bolstered Second Amendment rights, endangering gun owners in the name of free speech continues to be the blood sport of the Fourth Estate.

Two weeks ago, the Roanoke (Va.) Times published an online database of registered concealed handgun permit holders in the paper's community under the sanctimonious guise of "Sunshine Week." The database included both the names and street addresses of some 135,000 Virginians with permits to carry concealed weapons. Columnist Christian Trejbal patted himself on the back for making it easy to snoop on the neighbors: "I can hear the shocked indignation of gun-toters already: It's nobody's business but mine if I want to pack heat. Au contraire. Because the government handles the permitting, it is everyone's business."

Trejbal denied that compiling the concealed carry permit holders list was "about being for or against guns." But he exposed his true agenda when he compared law-abiding gun owners to . . . sex offenders: "A state that eagerly puts sex offender data online complete with an interactive map could easily do the same with gun permits, but it does not."

The Roanoke Times showed reckless disregard for the safety of the license holders and reckless disregard for accuracy. In his column, Trejbal admitted that he knew some of the information he had obtained was inaccurate -- but published it anyway: "As a Sunshine Week gift, The Roanoke Times has placed the entire database, mistakes and all [emphasis added], online at www.roanoke.com/gunpermits. You can search to find out if neighbors, carpool partners, elected officials or anyone else has permission to carry a gun."

After an uproar among gun-owners, including domestic violence victims licensed to carry, the Times finally decided to yank the database. Trejbal seems not to feel much remorse: "Did we make it easier [to obtain the information]? Yes. But it's still a public record." Let's review: He published a list he knew contained inaccuracies. His paper admits the decision endangered gun owners. He compiled a convenient shopping list for criminals -- and smacked law-abiding gun owners in the face with his comparison of their choice to exercise their rights with sex offenders.

Public disclosure of concealed carry licenses varies from state to state. Eighteen states protect permit holders' privacy from public view. Virginia is one of 17 states that make licensee records public. If information is public, does it make it right for a newspaper to publish it? The media exercise discretion all the time in withholding the names of minors or rape victims. Why should the privacy of law-abiding concealed handgun permit holders be treated with any less concern?

While the Roanoake Times has retreated, the witch hunt against gun owners continues. In New York City, Mayor Michael Bloomberg launched a "sting" operation targeting gun shops in five states for allegedly selling guns illegally. Alan Gottlieb and Dave Workman of the Second Amendment Foundation report that Bloomberg sent unauthorized private investigators to conduct the operation -- without notifying the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF):

"The odor ripened when Bloomberg filed civil lawsuits against these gun shops, rather than turn over evidence to the proper authorities for criminal prosecution. Bloomberg's office refused to turn over that evidence, and instead the billionaire mayor launched a high-profile media campaign demonizing the targeted gun shop operators."

Bloomberg has, of course, earned the praise of the anti-Second Amendment media for his security-undermining stunt. The unholy alliance between Big Nanny politicians and journalists threatens us all.
guido2
Hello, Racegal55
Great article. Discouraging, but we have to know the enemy to combat the enemy.

I don't know of anybody who buys into mainstream media's BS, I don't understand why they continue to prosper, and alternative news sources have to be searched for....I suppose it boils down to what type of folks you surround yourself with.

Thanks for sharing this!

Respectfully posted,

guido2 in Houston (I still think you're a closet Micheal Waltrip fan....!!! Heck, who's not!)
Racegal20
I'm not on this fourum for technical information. I couldn't tell you a thing about a single part on a gun. I know how to shoot a gun but myknowledge stops there. I'm here on the legal end of gun ownership. It's all about writing your representatives and telling them how you feel. As much as I have, I'm sure my reps know me well.
BTW, I'm not a closet Mikey fan. I'm an 'in your face' Mikey fan. That commercial they showed during the last race with Mikey, DJ and Sammy Hagar was just plain wrong. <shaking head>. sad.gif
headshot
Check out thiscomment:

QUOTE
[March 11, 2007 9:15 AM]
Scot Shippee

For those law abiding citizens like me who don't appreciate our full names and addresses (whether they are former addresses or not) being posted online, let me me also "illustrate the open government process"

CHRISTIAN J TREJBAL
675 SCHOOL LN
CHRISTIANSBURG, VA 24073

Now that the playing field is leveled, I would like to add that the freedom of information act is a necessary evil, posting personal information on the internet as a "Sunshine Week Gift" is not.
tritium
QUOTE (headshot @ Mar 22 2007, 05:47 PM) *
Check out thiscomment:

QUOTE
[March 11, 2007 9:15 AM]
Scot Shippee

For those law abiding citizens like me who don't appreciate our full names and addresses (whether they are former addresses or not) being posted online, let me me also "illustrate the open government process"

CHRISTIAN J TREJBAL
675 SCHOOL LN
CHRISTIANSBURG, VA 24073

Now that the playing field is leveled, I would like to add that the freedom of information act is a necessary evil, posting personal information on the internet as a "Sunshine Week Gift" is not.






It would be poetic justice if the reporter's (Trejbal's) professional career were to be ended by his blatant abuse of the First Amendment which he used to commit his idiocy. He should never be allowed to work in any publishing industry again.
USpride
Great posts! I read about that in the Washington Times. It's totally ridiculous and sadly typical of anti-gun mass media. Michelle Malkin is a great author and columnist, Racegal. 032.gif Good post Headshot, I know the Virginia gun owners movement is strong and they don't take things like this lying down.
Racegal20
QUOTE (USpride @ Mar 22 2007, 09:07 PM) *
Great posts! I read about that in the Washington Times. It's totally ridiculous and sadly typical of anti-gun mass media. Michelle Malkin is a great author and columnist, Racegal. 032.gif Good post Headshot, I know the Virginia gun owners movement is strong and they don't take things like this lying down.




Michelle is great. She was at the Gathering of Eagles. But my fav is Ann Coulter. I know there are some here that don't like her. But she is a private citizen expressing her personal point of view in a very 'colorful' way. That's all she is and all she'll ever be.
USpride
QUOTE (Racegal55 @ Mar 22 2007, 09:17 PM) *
QUOTE (USpride @ Mar 22 2007, 09:07 PM) *
Great posts! I read about that in the Washington Times. It's totally ridiculous and sadly typical of anti-gun mass media. Michelle Malkin is a great author and columnist, Racegal. 032.gif Good post Headshot, I know the Virginia gun owners movement is strong and they don't take things like this lying down.




Michelle is great. She was at the Gathering of Eagles. But my fav is Ann Coulter. I know there are some here that don't like her. But she is a private citizen expressing her personal point of view in a very 'colorful' way. That's all she is and all she'll ever be.



I agree! I've got a couple buddies that send me her columns regularly. I wish she would start to speak her mind though. laugh.gif
Racegal20
QUOTE (USpride @ Mar 22 2007, 10:12 PM) *
QUOTE (Racegal55 @ Mar 22 2007, 09:17 PM) *
QUOTE (USpride @ Mar 22 2007, 09:07 PM) *
Great posts! I read about that in the Washington Times. It's totally ridiculous and sadly typical of anti-gun mass media. Michelle Malkin is a great author and columnist, Racegal. 032.gif Good post Headshot, I know the Virginia gun owners movement is strong and they don't take things like this lying down.




Michelle is great. She was at the Gathering of Eagles. But my fav is Ann Coulter. I know there are some here that don't like her. But she is a private citizen expressing her personal point of view in a very 'colorful' way. That's all she is and all she'll ever be.



I agree! I've got a couple buddies that send me her columns regularly. I wish she would start to speak her mind though. laugh.gif



Ya mean 'tell me how you really feel'?

She's not very popular but she has balls of steel. smile.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.