Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Encoded ammo push in a state near you-
forum.Saiga-12.com > WELCOME > General Discussion - Any topic is welcome here!!!
t-amzn
It wont pass in my state of Missouri. House and Senate controlled by Republicats. If it should pass in the future, my family is moving to Tx.





The bill that is being pushed in 18 states (including Illinois and Indiana)
requires all ammunition to be encoded by the manufacturer in a data
base of all ammunition sales. So they will know how much you buy and what
calibers. Nobody can sell any ammunition after June 30, 2009 unless the
ammunition is coded.

Any privately held uncoded ammunition must be destroyed by July 1, 2011.
(Including hand loaded ammo.) They will also charge a .05 cent tax on every
round so every box of ammo you buy will go up at least $2.50 or more!

If they can deprive you of ammo they do not need to take your gun!

This legislation is currently pending in 18 states: Alabama, Arizona,
California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland,
Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island,
South Carolina, Tennessee, and Washington.

To find more about the anti-gun group that is sponsoring this legislation
and the specific legislation for each state, go to:
http://ammunitionaccountability.org/Legislation.htm 022.gif
scoutjoe
QUOTE (t-amzn @ Nov 25 2008, 11:21 PM) *
This legislation is currently pending in 18 states: Alabama, Arizona,
California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland,
Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island,
South Carolina, Tennessee, and Washington.


I'd say that it doesn't have a chance here, but there are too many "fudds" who hate "assault weapons" and think that this will be ok.

Click to view attachment

They going to come "house to house"? I think I have enough .22 around here that I could easily forget 500 rounds, guess that makes me a terrorist since that tin can is being assaulted by my 10/22 and all.. rolleyes.gif
elvis christ
Edit: After reading a bit about this, I've come to the conclusion that this was introduced in the 2008 session in Alabama, but I can't find any info regarding whether or not it passed. I'm assuming it didn't. I'm pretty sure I would have heard about it somewhere.
tritium
The Missouri bill (SB 1200) if passed would have been effective as of 28 August 2008. No one has heard of this legislation passing and I would be led to believe it did not fly as otherwise a great uproar would have erupted in this state. I have pretty close contact with FFLs and law enforcement. Interestingly that is the same date that a law in MO did become effective that silencers are now legal in this state.
Nailbomb
And i've been shopping for some bulk packages of 1000 rounds...

thats gonna be one bloated disgusting excuse for a database real quick.

Of course NY will probably one of the first to embrace this new and wonderful technology...

help...
22_Shooter
Well I buy 99% of my ammo online. So if the place I buy ammo from is not one of the states who passes this BS, but my state does (which I wouldn't doubt, I live in NY, after all rolleyes.gif ), then what?

unsure.gif
MD_Willington
The whole system is owned by some Seattle liberal dickhead.. yay WA State.. {/sarcasm... my state sucks!
superA
QUOTE (22_Shooter @ Nov 26 2008, 06:08 AM) *
Well I buy 99% of my ammo online. So if the place I buy ammo from is not one of the states who passes this BS, but my state does (which I wouldn't doubt, I live in NY, after all rolleyes.gif ), then what?

unsure.gif






I was also wondering about that, anybody with any info on how the law would work on this? This is a disgusting thing these cock suckers are trying to do. I think it's time that gun owners started trying to get their own laws passed that would leave the anti gunners with no place to complain. Basically make harsh laws on criminals in possession or trying to obtain firearms. That way we can say "Look, we are dealing with the bad guys in what we can define as an effective manner, why are you trying to come after the law abiding citizens?" It seems like they try to pass these broad laws when these restrictions should only be applying to criminals. Can you imagine if the average gang banger/thug was looking at an instant 25 years with no chance for good behavior release if he got caught? I know it wouldn't stop all of them but it would sure make them think twice before using it for something as stupid as holding up a gas station. Since the politicians don't seem to be able to separate us from the bad guys maybe we should do it for them. Leave them with no leg to stand on. Then their attempts would appear as they truly are. An attack on law abiding citizens.
read_the_wall
QUOTE (MD_Willington @ Nov 26 2008, 06:43 AM) *
The whole system is owned by some Seattle liberal dickhead.. yay WA State.. {/sarcasm... my state sucks!


This is the same state that re elects a gov. that is 5 billion dollars in the hole.....stupid people here....it does suck
Mike the Wolf
The problem is that the bill is probably unconstitutional on face value because it affects interstate commerce, which is the domain of Congress alone.

It's got NO chance of passing in Arizona. I think Arizona is one of the few states with more lenient gun laws than Texas.
Frogfoot
What's really sad is that some people will actually believe the BS line that this legislation is being pushed as a method of reducing crime. It isn't. Its being pushed by the greedy owners of a corporation solely for the purpose of making money for themselves. The corporation in question is the one that developed and patented this particular 'ammo marking' technology, and their goal is to get laws passed in every state (or at the federal level) that requires all ammo to be marked using their, and only their, marking process. They want a monopoly, which given the huge numbers of cartridges sold in the U.S. ever year, would guarantee them massive profits for doing nothing other than giving ammo makers a license to use their technology, a technology for which there has not been the slightest indication that it would reduce crime one iota.

Any time I run into anyone who tells me that they think the various forms of cartridge ID (bullet ballistic finger print databases, shell casing databases, ammo encoding, etc.) are a good idea and should be required by law, I just point out that they then must also be in favor of a national fingerprint and DNA database which would have the fingerprints and DNA of every U.S. citizen, since after all on average fingerprint evidence and DNA evidence can be used to solve more crimes than ballistic evidence. That shuts up most of these 'I think ammo ID is a good idea' nimrods, though of course there are always going to be a few hypocrites who don't think that a national fingerprint/DNA database would be okay, but that a bullet encoding/bullet database is somehow different and would be okay.
TR Young
I reload all my handgun ammo, and will probably get into reloading for the Saiga once it arrives. I wonder how the Left Wing is going to try to keep folks like me under their microscope?
THE_HUNTER
Damn fucktards have nothing else to do than play this bullshit. Shouldn't they be doing something like....um.....fixing our economy and locking up rapists, murders and drug dealers? Guess since they are not doing their jobs they have a lot of time to piss away coming up with insanity like "bullet encoding"! mad.gif
MCASgt New River
http://ammunitionaccountability.org/Legislation.htm

THE LINK ABOVE WILL TAKE YOU TO THE SITE THAT LISTS THE STATES BELOW AND WHAT LEGISLATION THEY WANNA PUSH:

Alabama, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Washington.

We need to act now before this festering pile of shit spreads! Write, email or call those senators, govenors & the like. This is BS!! 022.gif 022.gif 022.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.