Jump to content

DLT

Contributor
  • Content Count

    2,808
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    20

Posts posted by DLT

  1. Nice rifle. I picked up a similar rifle at a pawn shop in vg condition. Out of paranoia, I decided to upgrade the bolt on mine after acquiring a set of headspace gauges. Mine would not close on "go". While some think thats great, at least it closes on a live round, I wasnt thrilled about it. Too tight a headspace can lead to an overpressure condition, which can lead to other issues. I could be wrong, but that may be the reason why so many people are claiming premature wear of their rifles. I was able to acquire an original 1960's Polish milled bolt and it headspaced perfectly. I shoot it and clean it regularly now with no reservations about a possible issue.

  2. Ok.  Finally shot it.  No explosions and the bullets went exactly where they were supposed to go.  I was careful though. I sandbagged the rifle and reached around a piece of plywood between me and the rifle in the event that it went kaboom.  Anyway, before going out the ranch a surplus 1960 Polish milled bolt in the white that I was able to locate on gunbroker finally arrived.  Since I had all my gauges with me, I decided what the heck, let me check...and guess what PERFECT FIT.  Closes on GO with only a few pounds of force and doesn't budge at all on the  NO GO.  So I took both with me and tried them both out.  

     

    So now I've got two functional bolts along with the original.  I decided to keep the surplus 1960 in the rifle since it seems to cycle the smoothest of the three.

    ziYklK1.jpg

     

     

    OfXLoHH.jpg

     

    VrOQiBg.jpg

  3. Just a brief update. Been shooting the rifle and still no issues. However, after reading on all the drama surrounding the bolt and headspace on these rifles,I decided to invest on a WBP replacement bolt and a set of cip gauges. I noticed some rather interesting things. First, the rifle will not close on a "go" gauge using the original bolt. Hmmm....ok. secondly, the replacement bolt was too large so I had to adjust it to fit. 9 hours later, she finally closed on "go" with pressure. It's nowhere near closing on the "no go" so all is right. I now have a replacement bolt if necessary.

     

    Now here's what I find interesting. The bolt face of the new bolt sits deeper than the original. This translates to a significantly less sloppy fit of the bolt when locked. Even though the old bolt is too tight to close on "go", it wiggles a heck of a lot more when closed. I'm wondering if this slop coupled with too tight a headspace is why the original bolt developed the step on the right side locking area? That basically the receiver lug cut into it due to slight misallignment and fit? What do you all think?

  4. As usual, lots of misinformation out there.  Typical liberals taking advantage of a situation, and typical republicans also.  I'm not sure what the hell to do about these sort of things because nobody sure as hell gives a rat ass about the larger number of murdered kids in shitcago over the weekend.  It's pure liberal reporting and hysterical hypocrisy.  All I know is banning all firearms hasn't stopped more than 60,000 murders in Mexico since 2010, nor put a dent on inner city crime all over liberal controlled parts of the country.  

  5. Mixed...your conclusion makes sense. On another note,  I decided to cover the finish wear with a sharpie to observe wear firsthand since the bolt already had the wear showing when I acquired it.  I'm curious to see how many rounds it will take to start showing the same wear again.  Also. I had a friend of mine with extensive manufacturing and fabrication experience look at the step on the bolt and he thinks it may not have formed, but was actually built into the bolt at the time of manufacture to facilitate bolt to receiver lug engagement.  But since I've never seen a virgin bolt, I can't verify that.  Anyone got a non fired C39V2 laying around to examine?

×
×
  • Create New...