Voodoods

Hehe- "have killed" and 'should even attempt to kill' are often two things some hunters don't morally perceive; I saw a guy on a thread one time try to argue the virtues of moose hunting with a .223. Many guys will claim they are all about shot placement, but having an adequete gun to harvest game is a big part of being a responsible hunter and warden of nature IMHO. And I'm always reminded of the fact that people used to crawl into bear dens with .22s and kill bears, and the story of the Alaskan grandma who took a bear on her front porch with a .380 or some little thing.... Can you?

Hi - I'm new here, but I've seen these discussions before and I thought I would weigh in - its not about accuracy - the biggest difference is going to be ENERGY - the M4 (.223 platform) is considered underpowered in its current configuration because it simply doesn't carry that round to the same energy levels the old 20inch gun provided... hence you had Blackhawk down where targets were getting hit several times by our guys and getting back up - and this feedback continues to come in. So much so that, the military is looking for a beefier round to put the smack back into that shorty config