wlnt 2 Posted July 22, 2007 Report Share Posted July 22, 2007 I took my Saiga buttstock and "remodeled" it to look more like an AK and less like a sporting rifle. It is shorter and contoured differently. I don't know if this would make a difference but, if I weighed the amount of material that I used (that was made in the US), it is more than the original imported stock. In other words the buttstock contains over 50 percent of USA materials. In case you haven't seen the buttstock here it is. Can I count this as a part that was made in the USA? The same question would apply to Saiga magazines that are welded together. louielouie Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kresk 10,063 Posted July 22, 2007 Report Share Posted July 22, 2007 General consensus has always been 'once foreign made, always foreign made,' so don't think you could count your stock for compliance. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BobAsh 582 Posted July 22, 2007 Report Share Posted July 22, 2007 I would say no. It's still a rifle stock that was originally made in Russia. Same with the mags. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
okie shooter 0 Posted July 22, 2007 Report Share Posted July 22, 2007 If the orginal stock is imported, no matter how much you change it, its still imported. Unless it was like steel, that you melted down and cast and milled, once imported, always imported in its orginal form and intent. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.