gose 17 Posted June 5, 2013 Report Share Posted June 5, 2013 Two of them! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Armand Willis 4 Posted June 5, 2013 Report Share Posted June 5, 2013 Sweet! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CalveryDemon 4 Posted June 5, 2013 Report Share Posted June 5, 2013 (edited) How do you like that Magpul stock on the MKA? I debated getting one, then just threw on a CTR I already had. Two of them! Edited June 5, 2013 by CalveryDemon Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Armand Willis 4 Posted June 5, 2013 Report Share Posted June 5, 2013 (edited) More importantly, how do you like it? It could be a facial hair-snagger. I've shot the Ergo version and it suits me. Edited June 5, 2013 by The Shop Monkey Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gose 17 Posted June 5, 2013 Author Report Share Posted June 5, 2013 How do you like that Magpul stock on the MKA? I debated getting one, then just threw on a CTR I already had. Two of them! Much preferred it over the ACS that it came with. IMHO it balances better with the UBR and its solid (I tried the supplied ACS on both a mil and commercial tube and it was still kinda sloppy) Really like he feel of the FB Adjustable stock though. Just need to figure out if it should get a pad or not. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tankin 1 Posted June 5, 2013 Report Share Posted June 5, 2013 Hmmm...I've been debating between the ACS and the STR. May have to pony up and get the UBR. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
KIRCH76 12 Posted June 6, 2013 Report Share Posted June 6, 2013 I have the acs-l and I love it... I like the concept of the ubr but not worth the kinda money in my opinion. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
theaxemann 3 Posted June 6, 2013 Report Share Posted June 6, 2013 Limb saver pad for magpul stock was a must for me, since I like to shoot 3" slugs a lot. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mjohn11 2 Posted June 15, 2013 Report Share Posted June 15, 2013 (edited) Gonna one-up here. FBP lower with mag extension. Edited June 15, 2013 by mjohn11 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
StealthyBlagga 4 Posted June 15, 2013 Report Share Posted June 15, 2013 I see the lower gun has the mid-barrel brake removed (just the holes drilled in the barrel). What are your thoughts on the mid-barrel brake vs just porting the barrel vs. no ports at all? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gose 17 Posted June 17, 2013 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 I see the lower gun has the mid-barrel brake removed (just the holes drilled in the barrel). What are your thoughts on the mid-barrel brake vs just porting the barrel vs. no ports at all? The new XN barrels are thicker, so the old FB comp design wont fit and doesnt have enough material to be shaved off to fit. As soon as they make a comp that fits, it will be attached. That being said, shooting them side by side I didnt notice much of a difference in perceived recoil and flip. I didnt do any timed tests though, so purely based on feeling. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.