hallboss 1 Posted January 15, 2009 Report Share Posted January 15, 2009 (edited) Okay I now have both and here are some photos to show the length difference between the SGM and the AGP. I also am going to post some pros and cons to the mags as I see them. I have not fired my shotgun with the mags, I have only hand cycled them through the gun and LULA'd them several times. As you can obviously see the SGM is longer, but it is not that much. SGM pro: The construction appears to be sturdier with thicker plastic Easily disassembled with markings for different intervals cons: As mentioned earlier, will not handle 3" loads without breakage Handcycling three mags reveals a FTF at least three times per mag. Longer Heavier than the AGP No steel feed lips. Lips show wear after several hand cycles Spring feels weak and follower hangs up in several places in body AGP pros: Proven design Lighter Shorter Steel lips Spring is stiffer offering a more positive feed No FTF's cons: Appears to be made of a lighter material umm...appears to be made of a lighter material I will give a full write up on these mags when I actually have the time to get to the range. Hope this answers some questions, but I know it doesn't answer all of them. Edited January 15, 2009 by hallboss Quote Link to post Share on other sites
firedawg 0 Posted January 15, 2009 Report Share Posted January 15, 2009 (edited) if i am correct, i also believe with the SGM 12/13 rnd cut down to the 8 rd, it will actually hold 9 shells. only downside is you can't load the mag with 9 rnds on a closed bolt. it really isn't that much size difference b/t the agp 10 rnd and SGM 8/9 rnd-- in my opinion. Edited January 15, 2009 by firedawg Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hobbyshooter 59 Posted January 15, 2009 Report Share Posted January 15, 2009 (edited) My experience between AGP & Surefire is just the opposite. The followers of my AGP hung up at several places and I actually had to spent a bit of time sanding down the follower to get it to feed reliably. My Surefire mags haven't had a single hickup feeding yet, the spring feels softer but with less resistance on the follower it feeds fine. Once polished up my AGPs feed fine. With about 100 rnds through my Surefire mag I don't see any wear on the lips themselves to be concerned about. I am concerned about the front latch breaking off, and I'm tempted to do some tests on one of my mags with some 3" 00 buck rem. Edited January 15, 2009 by hobbyshooter Quote Link to post Share on other sites
uzitiger 193 Posted January 15, 2009 Report Share Posted January 15, 2009 An alternative to sanding is using a fired steel shell case. I had one from the Russian shotgun ammo and used it to burnish my AGP magazine to eliminate the sticking spots now the magazine functions flawlessly. I had cycled the shell case in the magazine over 100 times. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Steve_Feist 1 Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 It seems to many that the most compelling reason for going the Surefire route is to be able to cut the mag down to an 8 rounder for compliance issues. There is now an alternative. I was at AGP in Tempe, AZ yesterday picking up a couple of 10 mags. They now have a bolt up mag floor plate that will allow you to cut their mags back to a 8 round, 6 round or what ever. In fact, I saw physical examples of the 8 & 6 at their facility. Hopefully, this gives some of you the option that you have been looking for. Email John @ AGP for more details. Cheers, Zonie Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.