Jump to content

poolingmyignorance

Contributor
  • Content Count

    3,215
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

Everything posted by poolingmyignorance

  1. I think it's like Odd Man Out commented on the chewbacca lady thread.. he just enjoyed the fact somebody could find joy in something so simple. I work with a lot of stuffy arrogant engineers now.. I love hanging with the shop guys and busting chops, not having to censor myself or respect anybody's safe space. You know, if they ain't talking shit to you, they don't like you.
  2. Really guys? You kinda walked into it. I almost ran with it, but was distracted by the awesome smoker... and it was low hanging fruit. Oh well. I guess we all have different tolerancea for low brow humor. I reminded me of an exchange with a student when I was teaching jiu-jitsu. He said something along the lines of the tight rash guards shirts I wrote being gay. I told him it was nothing compared to his skinny jeans. Then hits me with "well you roll around on the ground with sweaty men for a living. Can't get much gayer than that. " I said yes you can. You're paying money for m
  3. AMD63 KIT MISSING DUST COVER . No barrel. No receiver. Flame cut barrel and Receiver pieces still present. The wood hand guard and gas tube look real good. The wood pistol grip has a chip Asking 270
  4. Looks pretty good. Got any large pics of the whole smoker? (I like building them)
  5. I can understand that view. I think it was the virility of such frivolous videos that confounds us. I think as we see society constantly reduced to the lowest common denominator, we struggle to understand how the issue that are really pressing get over looked. The proles are majority of the populace.
  6. Don't inconvenience the neurons. You're better suited to more intellectual issues.
  7. Not to mention, it's a lot higher quality than the Mexican dirt bricks or the "sour diesel" every loser in the northeast claims to be selling. And thereby negates the whole " you don't know what it's sprayed with" argument proposed by people who chug fireball whiskey knowing all well and good it's cut with glycol, yes literally anti freeze.
  8. I think we should set the bar higher.I'm not here to have a pissing match of who's better, or worse. Just want people to see that both sides use distraction to remove or freedom.
  9. I really tried to formulate a thoughtful response but no matter how much I postulated I always came around to the same response: FUCK OBAMA
  10. Tell me why a stoner can't deliver pizza? Or stock shelves? You can snort coke and look down from a 30th story window on Wall Street just fine, it seems. Companies that drug test for low end, manual labor, minimum wage jobs are just wasting their money. It's all about policy. I worked at a refinery as consulting engineer in Kentucky. When I got there they had security meet me and escort me to the test lab. I get to the desk, fill out paper work, and the lab tech looks at it and says "Oh your supervising engineer, you don't have yo submit a sample. Only workers do. " Funny though c
  11. Horseshit. I love how Reagan is shackled with the Hughes Ammendment. He didn't take away your right to own machine guns, a overwhelmly Democratic congress did. Look up the vote in both chambers, His veto would have been overturned in a heartbeat. Still he should have vetoed on principle. Reagan was the antithesis of the "brand of what gets elected". How old are you? He is the example of what should be elected every election cycle. This country would be much better off with more Reagans and less Clinton's and Obama's.Well it was really just that "one time"... May 3, 1994 To Members of
  12. And both are relatively harmless when used responsibly. Addiction and dependence are complex and terrible issues but neither are exclusive to either substance. Though I do disagree that pot has that effect on all recreational users. I know some that are stereotype "Tommy Chong" and others that are superior athletes and professionals. So like alcohol, pot, prescription,food, sex, porn... your results my vary.
  13. I'm sorry if your intent was just to see people react to the article, then what would you describe the reaction YOU had? Was that what you would call the reaction of an unbiased observer? I think this comment reveals a lot about you. Why not just say what you mean? I'm not shy about saying the war on drugs is a failing effort that cost tax payers trillions, and only results in LEO, citizen and personal liberty as casualties. While drug czars, bank execs, and bureaucrats cash checks soaked in the publics blood. A trillion dollars, and the most sophisticated police force in the world wa
  14. As long as it is a schedule 1 narcotic very little research will be done, as it is currently viewed to have no actual medical value. I heard tale that they are in talks to reclassify it so that viable and indepth research can be done on it to see if all the claims are true and so that it can be used as a treatment for ailments that it does have a positive impact on. As long as people are conditioned to a negative knee jerk reaction at the mention of it that classification will never be attained. Remember it was civil disobedience that got the 18th amendment repealed. That was before the govern
  15. That I can appreciate.You know he who stirs the shit pot ,shall lick the spoon.
  16. Actually the entire article is designed to Prey Upon people who have an absolute ignorance of what cancer is. Cancer is caused by genetic mutation in the cells that cause it to reproduce uncontrolled anD undefined. All cancers are caused by genetic mutation that's in fact the very definition of what cancer is. So unless you're going to Advocate Banning every single substance that is known to cause cancer then you're pretty much a hypocrite. Let's start with sunlight. Perhaps we should make sun screen mandatory Seriously, haven't you ever wondered why your doctor always ask "is there a h
  17. My point wasn't to debate the findings, it was to illustrate how we accept one risk above another simply based on arbitrary dictate. You have no moral issue nor attach no social stigma to users of mind altering, decision impairing, detrimental to health substance,responsible for 88,000 deaths a year in USA alone : So long it comes in your preferred flavor. Don't pretend to think you can offend me. So please spare me your self righteous indignation. I'm am oil and gas engineer and subject to the most stringent of substance testing. I have no dog in this fight other than my desire to let peo
  18. If you read the full text, it also attributes the same properties to alcohol. So before you climb on your high horse... http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027510716300574?via%3Dihub
  19. Pretty good edit. I caught it though between 0:27 & 0:28 the cats tail is hanging out then suddenly disappeared right before it starts
  20. Doesn't really matter if he said it or not. The effects of his policies have been long reaching and decidedly destructive to the black community. Previous to 1963 Black and white families had nearly the same rate of single family house holds.. now today 13% of the population is holds 67% of the single parent families in the US..the trend began to spike quickly after LBJ's term completed in 69'. Perhaps this is just correlation and not causation, it's well worth noting that along with this policy that 5% of that 13% (males between age 8 & 24) are responsible for over 50% of the nations mur
×
×
  • Create New...