Clix

i just did the same 150 for all 25 boxes they had.

some new pics of the old gun....

so the gun with the us made mag is fine.. but does that mean i cant own a saiga mag? or jsut cant use a saiga mag? i would think that if i didnt use it than it would still be fine to own it, but ive seen some stranger laws than that.....

mine can a do a 3 inch group at 75 yards, right outta the box not so bad

ok so i hate to be the guy to ask this, but the more i read the more lost i get.... soooo i really dont wanna go through the whole deal of converting my rifle because i dont shoot it enough, so i bought the tapico pistol grip and stock all in one deal, now i under stand this makes my rifle out of compliance due to the fact of the PG. so i also bought the Galil style hand guard made for the saiga's, with leaves with with two parts, right? and i need to get to 10.... let me know if im off here So i bought surfire 30 round mag. with is 3 parts, so if i use all this stuff and only th

I have no usefull info to add to this thread, but i just gotta say... That is the most random place to take a pic of a gun that i have ever seen.

"Capacity to accept more than 10 rounds" shall mean capable of accommodating more than 10 rounds, but shall not be construed to include a feeding device that has been permanently altered so that it cannot accommodate more than 10 rounds. doesn;t that mean that no matter what it was built for, if it holds more your fucked???? as i read that(by no means am i a law man in any way so dont take this to heart) to me it says,"If it holds 11, your liable for 11 bullets in your gun." This is very thin ice your walking on. Just because you read it one way does not mean the lawyer on the

so what if someone from PRK made a weekend trip to the next state over and came home with a new gun... would that be legal?

so lets say i had a saiga .223, changed it to a pistol, with a stock i could bolt back on and be a rifle, That would break the law, but i go out and buy a .223 pistol and bolt on a rifle stock and im leagal? Right???

so if i read right..... we need to send $200.00 in and fill a form out, and than its legal to have a gun like above?

I have one with a single rail on top, and it works great, and mine is raised so i can use the open sights under the scope. i would say go for it...

all looks to be good there. it could be a sign i should have got the .308, or that i need to buy a 12.......

Well i got to take it out this weekend. The first time. Man it felt great, Shot ten rounds to make sure it all went good than took it out on the prowl for coyotes, didnt see any, but i did happen to run in to a skunk. and oh man im glad i went with the 762 But all and all i cant belive how little recoil there is on this gun for the weight. My buddy has a colt ar15 and im pretty sure mine has less than his 223. I did notice that every few shots the trigger would sorta stick? i guess thats the word. It would like just flop till i pulled the bolt back a little than everything

Heres mine. Pretty much the only think i plan on doing to it, Its a hog gun, so i dont really have a need for anyhting else to it. I might buy another to play with. Surefire Light with pressure switch, Side mounted. and a cheap bi pod. makes it nice getting in and out of the woods in the night time and doesnt weight too much to pack for a few miles....

OK so I just picked up my Saiga this last weekend. Now im looking for a higher cap. mag. I want something that will work jsut fine and i dont really want to mod anything. I got the rifle for hog hunting, so i dont really have a need to go all out on it. So what would be a good option as far as mags? And also i would like to put a skeleton buttstock. if i put that on, I've been seeing somehting about 922. Would it still be ok with that? Im sure these are pretty new questions, but the more i read the more im getting confused....