one2za 7 Posted March 3, 2010 Report Share Posted March 3, 2010 CSS shows two different internal receiver block stock adapters with the same description and same price. One has screws on the sides and the other doesn't. Does anyone know the pro's and con's of one over the other? I'm leaning toward the one with the side screws. It looks more secure. (I assume these align with the removed linkage pins?) I'd hate to buy the wrong one. Thanks. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GerryV 14 Posted March 3, 2010 Report Share Posted March 3, 2010 (edited) They both work the same....the second one just has the option of using your old trigger holes as additional fastening points. Edited March 3, 2010 by GerryV Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gtnichols 51 Posted March 3, 2010 Report Share Posted March 3, 2010 I used the one with the side screws. I believe it requires more work (removing metal from the rear and fitting). I also had cut/trim it to fit around the trigger and some other internals, your situation may vary. All in all I am very happy with it, they both limit your choice of stocks to those that bolt on with 2 screws, and does not allow the use of any optic mounts/rails that attach to the rear tang/stock. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pedal2alloy 206 Posted March 3, 2010 Report Share Posted March 3, 2010 If you want to fill in the old holes, then this one connects to the PG nut which seems really solid to me. http://www.mississippiautoarms.com/stock-adapter-p-137.html Quote Link to post Share on other sites
billyjoebob 10 Posted March 3, 2010 Report Share Posted March 3, 2010 I used the one with the side screws. I believe it requires more work (removing metal from the rear and fitting). I also had cut/trim it to fit around the trigger and some other internals, your situation may vary. All in all I am very happy with it, they both limit your choice of stocks to those that bolt on with 2 screws, and does not allow the use of any optic mounts/rails that attach to the rear tang/stock. I think the newer verson of "screw-in" receiver blocks have been modified to accomodate coverted internals. I just installed one from CSS, and it fit perfectly. Cutting the tang off the receiver was MUCH tougher than I thought it would be (very hard metal), but once you get the area flush you should have no problems. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
one2za 7 Posted March 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 3, 2010 I appreciate the input. I am considering the following one too. Has anyone tried it? I.S.A. from Magnolia State Armory 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.