Guilty on all counts!

[stokstad 4]

http://www.wkowtv.com/index.php/news/story/p/pkid/22274

 

The race cards are already starting to come out. It was all racially motivated, He wouldnt have been guilty if there were minorities on the jury, Blah Blah Blah. They chose the jury from Very liberal Dane county because they felt that he couldnt get a good jury in the county the trial was held. Its not self defense whehn you shoot multiple people, multiple times in the back. I just wish we had the Death penalty.

 

To see how bad its already getting click the "Video Story" link above the headline on the previous link. I hate the media.

Edited September 17, 2005 by stokstad

[pistonring8 1]

Thanks, I was just wondering about that.

[SaigaShooter 0]

I really wish they would have told the public more about the evidence, alot of what we got was hearsay. including that the rifle that was recovered at the scene hadn't been fired, but the saftey was off. I just want the hard facts.

[G O B 3,516]

The fact that Vang re-loaded 2 times (30 rds total) came out at the trial. No way could 6 dead and 2 wounded (most shot in the back) be "self defence". Vang is going where he belongs.

 

G O B

[BattleRifleG3 16]

Glad the Vang-ker was convicted on all accounts, sounds like the jury had way more sense than the media.

 

Far as minority representation goes, what's the Hmong population, that they think such a person represents a 1/12 of the US population?

 

I have a feeling that a black person or two on the jury would have seen things with the same common sense.