I hate "high capacity" mags!

[GregM1 241]

the term "high capacity" mags is so dumb. if people want to outlaw them, why not outlaw "high capacity" gas tanks on cars that hold over 10 gallons. that makes the enviroment extra polluted. Why not outlaw "high capacity" egg cartons that hold a dozen and bring them back to a reasonable 10 egg limit. really does one person need the health concern of that many additional eggs?

 

fuck the media buzz word factory.

[shades_of_grey 1,092]

...why not outlaw "high capacity" gas tanks on cars that hold over 10 gallons. that makes the enviroment extra polluted...

 

Don't give the Marxist misanthropes any more ideas, Greg!!

Edited September 2, 2010 by post-apocalyptic

[Casp 119]

I don't like hi-cap mags either. They are fun but C-mags are too damn heavy.

[csspecs 1,987]

Yeah.

 

I don't make high capacity mags, we make the standard (20s) and everything else is a low capacity.

[nalioth 405]

<snip> and everything else is a low capacity.

This is just as bad as using the "high capacity magazine" term.

 

When you say "low capacity", what's the opposite?

 

 

 

How about we just stick to "double stack", "single stack", "milsurp", or even "magazine" for our descriptions?

Edited September 2, 2010 by nalioth

[G O B 3,516]

20-30 rounds is a STANDARD mag,every thing else is either reduced or enhanced capacity.

THE WORDS 'HIGH CAPACITY" AND "LOWER CAPACITY" ARE VAGUE AND MEANINGLESS.

[misternt 3]

What about 22LR ammo? Subsonic and supersonic ammo both sound pretty scary!

[nalioth 405]

What about 22LR ammo? Subsonic and supersonic ammo both sound pretty scary!

You misunderstand.

 

Subsonic and supersonic describe actual physical states.

 

The terms "high capacity magazine" and "low capacity magazine" are based on opinion.