JESS1344 508 Posted November 25, 2014 Report Share Posted November 25, 2014 (edited) GUYS, I THINK NBC IS PERPETRATING A FRAUD WITH THESE PICTURES AS THERE IS ZERO DAMAGE TO WILSONS FACE. EITHER THEY AIRBRUSHED THE INJURY AWAY, OR THIS IS A DIFFERENT VISIT TO THE ER, THAN THE ONE CONNECTED TO THE BROWN SHOOTING. ISN'T NBC THE ONE THAT WAS CAUGHT FAKING THE EXPLODING TRUCK GAS TANKS, A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO? THEY ACTUALLY AFIXED EXPLOSIVE CHARGES TO THE TRUCK GAS TANKS TO MAKE THEM EXPLODE UPON IMPACT FROM ANOTHER VEHICLE. JUS' SAYIN'........ JESS1344 Click here: Photos Show Officer Darren Wilson After Michael Brown Shooting - NBC News.com Edited November 25, 2014 by JESS1344 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
storm6490 2,768 Posted November 25, 2014 Report Share Posted November 25, 2014 (edited) strange morning.. wrong topic.. Edited November 25, 2014 by Stryker0946 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ronin38 2,117 Posted November 25, 2014 Report Share Posted November 25, 2014 The real tricky question is... Which photos are false? The ones "leaked" earlier showing the fractures, or these "official" ones? Getting so's you can't trust anyone these days. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spartacus 1,619 Posted November 25, 2014 Report Share Posted November 25, 2014 . Is the dark area a bruise or just 5 o'clock shadow? Looks like it does wrap around on his chin too. Hard to tell without more pics. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
james lambert 3,059 Posted November 25, 2014 Report Share Posted November 25, 2014 I have seen plenty of injuries in person and in pictures from accidents and crime scenes. Pictures rarely show the injuries well, its real hard to say how bad it is. Usually the written report from the doctor is much more telling 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
poolingmyignorance 2,191 Posted November 25, 2014 Report Share Posted November 25, 2014 That's a bruise. Notice the red patchy with darker purple underlay.. Indicative of busted blood vessels. I am curious about the legitimacy of the X ray pictures of the orbital socket.. Years of getting beat up I've never seen that happen without at least a black eye. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
HB of CJ 1,263 Posted November 25, 2014 Report Share Posted November 25, 2014 (edited) They say the first causality (sp) of war is the truth. Are we at war? I am an old coot. I distinctly remember the very first newspaper headline pictures the day Kennedy was shot. Evening edition. One of the pictures showed Jacqueline Kennedy climbing onto the trunk of the Lincoln limo to retrieve a piece of President Kennedy's scalp and skull. The fragment was in plain sight. A few weeks later there was a special edition of Time Magazine and the same apparent picture had been altered. The skull/scalp fragment was missing and the caption said Jacqueline was "going for help." I showed both pictures to my dad and asked him why there was a difference. His answers were that the pictures had been changed, he did not know why and something was going on that we were not aware of. He also told me I was starting to grow up and beginning to question my government, newspapers and magazines. That was the about the first time at the age of 12 that I began to understand official lies. So now it begins? I hope not. So many pressures coming from so many different directions. Could it all have a commonality? A common source? Or ... is it all independent and just appears to be related? HB of CJ (old coot) Edited for speeeling Edited November 25, 2014 by HB of CJ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JESS1344 508 Posted November 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 25, 2014 They say the first causality (sp) of war is the truth. Are we at war? I am an old coot. I distinctly remember the very first newspaper headline pictures the day Kennedy was shot. Evening edition. One of the pictures showed Jacqueline Kennedy climbing onto the trunk of the Lincoln limo to retrieve a piece of President Kennedy's scalp and skull. The fragment was in plain sight. A few weeks later there was a special edition of Time Magazine and the same apparent picture had been altered. The skull/scalp fragment was missing and the caption said Jacqueline was "going for help." I showed both pictures to my dad and asked him why there was a difference. His answers were that the pictures had been changed, he did not know why and something was going on that we were not aware of. He also told me I was starting to grow up and beginning to question my government, newspapers and magazines. That was the about the first time at the age of 12 that I began to understand official lies. So now it begins? I hope not. So many pressures coming from so many different directions. Could it all have a commonality? A common source? Or ... is it all independent and just appears to be related? HB of CJ (old coot) Edited for speeeling HB, I'VE ALWAYS CALLED "BULLSHIT" ON BOTH RETREIVING FRAGMENT AND GOING FOR HELP; OL' JACKIE WAS GETTIN' THE FUCK OUTA DODGE. I REMEMBER MY DAD, A VETERAN OF PEARL HARBOR, GUADALCANAL, AND OTHER ISLAND PARADISES, ENDING IN THE CARABELLA MOUNTAINS OF THE PHILIPPINES, TAKING ONE LOOK AT THAT PICTURE AND IT'S ORIGINAL CAPTION ABOUT THE FRAGMENT, AND SNORTING "BULL, SHE'S GETTING THE HELL OUT OF THE LINE OF FIRE; I'VE SEEN TOO MANY PEOPLE, AND HOW THEY REACT TO BEING TAKEN UNDER FIRE, TO BELIEVE THAT"! YEA WOLFHOUNDS! (DAD'S OUTFIT) JESS1344 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
So Low 2 13 Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 (edited) OL' JACKIE WAS GETTIN' THE FUCK OUTA DODGE. JESS1344 This was my first impression when I saw this. Edited November 26, 2014 by So Low 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DLT 1,646 Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 I've seen boxers get KO'd and not have a scratch on their face afterwards. Lack of swelling or redness means nothing. The thug assaulted him and the threat was stopped. Case closed. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.