BpS12 512 Posted May 1, 2012 Report Share Posted May 1, 2012 Ok, I know its been about two years since I started this version, but work, surgery and gettting an RPK will do that, lol. I've got the internals worked out. I'm yet to shoot it as I have a couple of stablizing blocks to put in place and venting to do with a mind towards a few later upgrades, as well as mount a cheek rest/sheild over the receiver. The butt you see is a storage compartment, but am toying with the idea of doing a spare mag holder instead. LoP is about 16-1/2", which works for me as I'm 6'1" and I can comfortably weild it with a 12rd drum. the Trigger linkage is a thin cable and is set up so it can be changed out in the field without dissasembly, if needed. Here's the latest pic I have. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gunfun 3,931 Posted May 1, 2012 Report Share Posted May 1, 2012 Is that made from plate. or is it a giant block? It is hard to see your method of construction with just the side profile. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BpS12 512 Posted May 1, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 1, 2012 (edited) Rectangular box stock, hence the need(I feel) for the support blocks. Since this pic I've added a rail over the barrel/under the front sight. Edited May 2, 2012 by BpS12 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
incognito485 26 Posted May 1, 2012 Report Share Posted May 1, 2012 Is that a Mako VZ 58 grip? Good choice. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BpS12 512 Posted May 1, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 1, 2012 Why yes, it is. It fits my hand well and the storage compartment is big enough for everything I need but the rod and oil. I've got one on my RPK now too. Just a note, I tried the little Chi-com grip that came on my RPK. With it on, I couldn't comfortably hold the shotgun with the 12rnd drum in it. It just didn't have a wide enough profile. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gunfun 3,931 Posted May 2, 2012 Report Share Posted May 2, 2012 What is your method for linking the trigger? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BpS12 512 Posted May 2, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 2, 2012 A thin cable. Adjustable at both ends, so no slack in the trigger pull. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gunfun 3,931 Posted May 2, 2012 Report Share Posted May 2, 2012 pulling from the trigger hook? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shades_of_grey 1,092 Posted May 2, 2012 Report Share Posted May 2, 2012 I'm never gonna like a bull-pupped S-12, but I have to admire your perserverance, BpS12! I look forward to seeing the finished product! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BpS12 512 Posted May 2, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 2, 2012 pulling from the trigger hook? Ya, pretty much like most. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BpS12 512 Posted May 2, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 2, 2012 I'm never gonna like a bull-pupped S-12, but I have to admire your perserverance, BpS12! I look forward to seeing the finished product! I understand, but given the other options, folding stocks, SBSing, etc, this is the best of all worlds, for me at least. and Thanks, me too, lol. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gunfun 3,931 Posted May 2, 2012 Report Share Posted May 2, 2012 How is it for shooting clay or other aerial targets? I do like the idea of a bullpup if it makes the gun more compact and less clumsy. Many of the pups seem more clumsy to me though. Yours looks pretty good ergonomically, except for the front handhold area. Extruded tube was a clever way to go too. Your sight picture looks pretty natural, and I like the sights you chose. Most of the conversion kits I have seen are good until you get to sighting, then they fall down because you have to hold your head at an awkward angle. Yours looks about right. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BpS12 512 Posted May 4, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 4, 2012 I honestly don't know. I've only shot the previous version and then only out to 40yrds at ground targets. I found that follow up shots are quicker as is target acquisition. As for the "pistol" sight, you do have to cant your head a bit, but I like that better than haveing to dip the barrel off target to keep the sight out of the way. I've got a M16 style Prail mounted handle w/rear sight that I've had on it and it adds alot of weight but seems to mesh well with the flip up front sight. The flip up sights alleiviate the head cant some but I don't care for "ghost rings", lol. The prail covers make the forend feel similar to a regular shotty. I'm looking to put a stubby foregrip and light on the bottom rail and the side rails may or may not stay on. Nice thing about this build is all the available rail options. You can have as many or as few as you want. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sumsky 115 Posted May 24, 2012 Report Share Posted May 24, 2012 (edited) BpS12, Great looking Pup. Do you have any room to shorten the LOP? The Pup I built have a LOP of 15 1/4 which is perfect for me, since I am only 5' 7". I was thinking of doing a S12 pup in the future. Edited May 24, 2012 by Sumsky Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BpS12 512 Posted May 24, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 24, 2012 Ya, I believe so. But for me, it then rules out useing the minidrum. There's probably an inch or so that the trigger can go back to towards the reciever. But at some point you will limit your pistol grip options. The KVar pg has slot in the bottom of the grip to act as a guide(for x39 mags). Some of the guys on here have rounded of the rear bottom of their pgs to make mag changes easier. Part of my goal is to make a bullpup kit that is minidrum friendly, unfortunately, arm length may well be an issue for some. I'm 6'1" and with a wide profile grip, I'm good to go. But not the scrawny little AK standard pg. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sumsky 115 Posted May 24, 2012 Report Share Posted May 24, 2012 Ya, I believe so. But for me, it then rules out useing the minidrum. There's probably an inch or so that the trigger can go back to towards the reciever. But at some point you will limit your pistol grip options. The KVar pg has slot in the bottom of the grip to act as a guide(for x39 mags). Some of the guys on here have rounded of the rear bottom of their pgs to make mag changes easier. Part of my goal is to make a bullpup kit that is minidrum friendly, unfortunately, arm length may well be an issue for some. I'm 6'1" and with a wide profile grip, I'm good to go. But not the scrawny little AK standard pg. This is not looking good for me if it rules out the mini drum. I have to figure out something. Anything over the 15 is going to be too far of a reach and not too comfortable. One of the reason I like my 7.62x39 pup is because everything is so compact and close to my body, and I can get more accurate follow up shots, the muzzle is a lot more controllable, compared to when it had a buttstock. Thanks for the info. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dustindu4 101 Posted May 24, 2012 Report Share Posted May 24, 2012 you should like, just get a Kushnapup Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gunfun 3,931 Posted May 25, 2012 Report Share Posted May 25, 2012 He made what he wanted, spent less money, didn't get lied too for over 2 years and knew for sure he was going to get it. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sumsky 115 Posted May 25, 2012 Report Share Posted May 25, 2012 (edited) He made what he wanted, spent less money, didn't get lied too for over 2 years and knew for sure he was going to get it. I like that. Thats for sure. Edited May 25, 2012 by Sumsky Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BpS12 512 Posted May 25, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 25, 2012 Sumsky, I know what you mean about compact, etc. But think of the bullpup as a shouldered pistol rather than a carbine. Assume your comfertable two hand pistol stance. Where your trigger hand is, is where you want it on your bullpup. The difference is that instead of pushing out as with a pistol, you're pulling in against the stock on your shoulder. I find that the farther out my pg, the more natural the pulling back. The closer in, the less control and I tend to cramp up more because I'm using more muscle to pull back AND hold up/balance the weapon. For drum use, a great deal depends on the profile of the grip. The wider, the better for reaching around the drum. Can you fit a drum in your x39? If you can, but your grip feels too small to be comfortable, try wrapping it in tape until you get a more comfortable reach around. If you don't have a drum, cut a round plastic tub of comparable size to fit on a mag. You could also do this with out pg attach to you fore end to see what length of pull fits you best and still allows drum use. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sumsky 115 Posted May 25, 2012 Report Share Posted May 25, 2012 Sumsky, I know what you mean about compact, etc. But think of the bullpup as a shouldered pistol rather than a carbine. Assume your comfertable two hand pistol stance. Where your trigger hand is, is where you want it on your bullpup. The difference is that instead of pushing out as with a pistol, you're pulling in against the stock on your shoulder. I find that the farther out my pg, the more natural the pulling back. The closer in, the less control and I tend to cramp up more because I'm using more muscle to pull back AND hold up/balance the weapon. For drum use, a great deal depends on the profile of the grip. The wider, the better for reaching around the drum. Can you fit a drum in your x39? If you can, but your grip feels too small to be comfortable, try wrapping it in tape until you get a more comfortable reach around. If you don't have a drum, cut a round plastic tub of comparable size to fit on a mag. You could also do this with out pg attach to you fore end to see what length of pull fits you best and still allows drum use. I did not even think about the shouldered pistol thing. I will try that. I have no clue if a Drum will fit in my 7.62x39, When I was doing all the measurements I did it with a 30 round Mag, I dont own a 7.62 drum. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BpS12 512 Posted May 26, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 26, 2012 (edited) Oops, nevermind, lol. Edited May 26, 2012 by BpS12 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BpS12 512 Posted May 26, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 26, 2012 (edited) Dustin, the Kpup is a very good entry level kit. But it is lacking. Custumization is very limited, NO optics rail with the kit, no choice of pg or fg, no forseeable upgrades, etc. Yes, some of these can be rectified(at additional cost), but some can't. The stock I'm trying to design will start as base kit, much like the Kpup, but have several additional options/later add ons available. Ie, forward mag release, foreword BHO assist, ambi-charging handle, up to 5rail options, base plate/storage compartment/spare mag butt options, a quick detach receiver cover and whatever else I can work into the design. Even if I decide not to manufature the kit, I will draw up and make the plans available. At the least. So, yes, go ahead and get the Kpup, enjoy it. Edited May 26, 2012 by BpS12 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BpS12 512 Posted May 26, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 26, 2012 He made what he wanted, spent less money, didn't get lied too for over 2 years and knew for sure he was going to get it. Thank you, but I am trying to do this with what everyone else seems to want as well. Thats part of the reason its taking so damn long, lol. That and the fact that this is not my primary job. Or even in the top three, lol. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gunfun 3,931 Posted May 26, 2012 Report Share Posted May 26, 2012 You've still beat Bjorn on his build. For what it's worth, I've been tinkering on one of mine for 4 years now and I can't really call it done yet. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BpS12 512 Posted May 27, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 27, 2012 Lol, actually, no. Its been two years or so since I started drawing up plans for this build. And will likely be another 6months or so before I'm satisfied with it. But I know what you mean. Tweaking seems to be a side effect of bullpuping, lol. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BpS12 512 Posted June 7, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 7, 2012 Just had my SO shoulder Thrasher with the drum in. She's less than 5'6" and she was comfortable with them drum reach around. So it should work for you short guys as well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
2ndAmendican 23 Posted June 7, 2012 Report Share Posted June 7, 2012 Looking good there BPS12. Would love to see some more pics, especially from different angles. Hard to figure out what you've done from just the one pic. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BpS12 512 Posted June 8, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2012 Thanks, I'll see what I can do. I'm working on it this weekend and have worked out a trigger bar connect rather than the cable. Also, if it works, a flushmout "magwell" for straight up/down mag insert/release. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gunfun 3,931 Posted June 16, 2012 Report Share Posted June 16, 2012 Those angles are pretty touchy to small variations. I recommend using a production magwell if you are going to do that. You could easily make up the cost in messed up magazines and frustration trying to get that right by trial and error. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.