Jump to content

Recommended Posts

lately ive been hearing all this talk about the "extra power" recoil spring by Wollf and im wonding what all the hype is about... I hear things like, "it reduces recoil and wear and tear on the rifle by not allowing your BCG to slam into the rear trunnion as hard or at all for that matter."

 

the way I see it, the soviets designed these rifles as robust as possible and im quite sure that the first AK-47 that rolled off the assembly line and issued to the Red Army back in 1949 still functions as flawlessly today as the day it was built...unless it was run over by a tank or something lol.

 

anyway, enough rambling...I know that the rubber "recoil buffers" are a joke and can actually increase and speed up wear and tear, but this stiff recoil spring sounds interesting and I just wanted to see what all the fuss was about and see if this might be something worth looking into or if its just a new relabled bottle of "Snake Oil" to attract the sheeple...

 

 

let me know,

-RR

Edited by RoughRider666
Link to post
Share on other sites

lately ive been hearing all this talk about the "extra power" recoil spring by Wollf and im wonding what all the hype is about... I hear things like, "it reduces recoil and wear and tear on the rifle by not allowing your BCG to slam into the rear trunnion as hard or at all for that matter."

 

the way I see it, the soviets designed these rifles as robust as possible and im quite sure that the first AK-47 that rolled off the assembly line and issued to the Red Army back in 1949 still functions as flawlessly today as the day it was built...unless it was run over by a tank or something lol.

 

anyway, enough rambling...I know that the rubber "recoil buffers" are a joke and can actually increase and speed up wear and tear, but this stiff recoil spring sounds interesting and I just wanted to see what all the fuss was about and see if this might be something worth looking into or if its just a new relabled bottle of "Snake Oil" to attract the sheeple...

 

 

let me know,

-RR

 

And exactly how is that supposed to work?

Link to post
Share on other sites

lately ive been hearing all this talk about the "extra power" recoil spring by Wollf and im wonding what all the hype is about... I hear things like, "it reduces recoil and wear and tear on the rifle by not allowing your BCG to slam into the rear trunnion as hard or at all for that matter."

 

the way I see it, the soviets designed these rifles as robust as possible and im quite sure that the first AK-47 that rolled off the assembly line and issued to the Red Army back in 1949 still functions as flawlessly today as the day it was built...unless it was run over by a tank or something lol.

 

anyway, enough rambling...I know that the rubber "recoil buffers" are a joke and can actually increase and speed up wear and tear, but this stiff recoil spring sounds interesting and I just wanted to see what all the fuss was about and see if this might be something worth looking into or if its just a new relabled bottle of "Snake Oil" to attract the sheeple...

 

 

let me know,

-RR

 

And exactly how is that supposed to work?

 

by not allowing the BCG to go all the way back and the shock of sandwiching the buffer between the BCG and trunnion can cause stress cracks on the rear trunnion rivet holes... Fact or fiction, im not willing to take a chance and find out... A logical thought process tells me that a recoil spring would be better than an "added" piece that wasnt meant to be there in the first place. If the Russians thought they were necessary, they would have been part of the original design... just sayin...

Edited by RoughRider666
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're talking about use in an AK rifle (which it sounds like you are), I've not heard of buffers ever causing problems. In some Saiga shotguns (undergassed ones shooting lightweight cheap loads), a buffer has been known to limit the rearward travel of the BCG and basically causes FTFs. Still no wear and tear however. My S12 can run a buffer without a problem.

 

As for increased power recoil springs, I can see it helping to absorb carrier momentum, as well as providing extra forward pressure to help the action close when it starts getting really dirty. Yeah, it would slam the carrier closed harder against the front trunnion, so I guess the extra couple pounds of force MIGHT (in theory) wear the carrier more, but not so you'd ever notice. It's like swinging a hammer with 2 extra pounds of force. I doubt the hammer will care.

 

*edit to add* By the same logic of "If the Russians thought they were necessary, they would have been part of the original design", they don't use extra power springs either. Or aftermarket red dots, custom slings or many of the items we tend to put on our personal weapons.

Edited by Corbin
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're talking about use in an AK rifle (which it sounds like you are), I've not heard of buffers ever causing problems. In some Saiga shotguns (undergassed ones shooting lightweight cheap loads), a buffer has been known to limit the rearward travel of the BCG and basically causes FTFs. Still no wear and tear however. My S12 can run a buffer without a problem.

 

As for increased power recoil springs, I can see it helping to absorb carrier momentum, as well as providing extra forward pressure to help the action close when it starts getting really dirty. Yeah, it would slam the carrier closed harder against the front trunnion, so I guess the extra couple pounds of force MIGHT (in theory) wear the carrier more, but not so you'd ever notice. It's like swinging a hammer with 2 extra pounds of force. I doubt the hammer will care.

 

*edit to add* By the same logic of "If the Russians thought they were necessary, they would have been part of the original design", they don't use extra power springs either. Or aftermarket red dots, custom slings or many of the items we tend to put on our personal weapons.

 

Good point with the springs. On the a side note though, im not sure if they were just press photos to show off or anything, but I have seen pix of Russian soldiers with Aimpoint, EOtech & Trijicon optics and rail systems and in some instances what looks to be magpul, vltor or US Palm accessories mounted on newer AK 100/200 series rifles...

Edited by RoughRider666
Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont see them being necessary. its a fuckin AK. sounds more like a marketing gimmick. and if the recoil spring wears to the point that is no longer feeding reliably, simply swap it out. everyone should have replacement springs for all their guns.

 

but like corbin pointed out, putting a stiffer spring in may cause the carrier to slam home harder. i dont see it hurting anything, but i dont see the point in using a stiffer spring either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i haved had one of these wolf xp springs for awhile now and just havent installed it yet. when i do i will let you know. i also bought a 10 pack of the xp mag springs. dont ask me why bc they cost almost as much as new mags. ha

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats a good point, but my friend has a recent Romy G build that seems like it doenst wanna cycle too well and the BCG hangs up on the hammer a LOT even after I helped him pollish the shit out of the G2 hammer in effort to give it the same profile of the Romanian hammer...

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats a good point, but my friend has a recent Romy G build that seems like it doenst wanna cycle too well and the BCG hangs up on the hammer a LOT even after I helped him pollish the shit out of the G2 hammer in effort to give it the same profile of the Romanian hammer...

 

well that's a build, there could be a whole host of problems with it, has he actually fired it or does it just seem rough, because all the romanian guns are rough as hell when new and it doesn't affect function at all

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

has anyone here ever heard of a factory ak that started out in good functioning condition breaking any of the main parts from firing, either with a buffer or without one

 

better yet, has anyone had a reason to use one of these stiffer springs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

im betting even a century gun could go 50,000 rounds or more before major parts started wearing to the point where function was affected, just take a look at the way they blow through ammo in third world countries, the round counts some of those guns have is ridiculous, and you know none of those guys maintain there guns at all

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

thats a good point, but my friend has a recent Romy G build that seems like it doenst wanna cycle too well and the BCG hangs up on the hammer a LOT even after I helped him pollish the shit out of the G2 hammer in effort to give it the same profile of the Romanian hammer...

 

well that's a build, there could be a whole host of problems with it, has he actually fired it or does it just seem rough, because all the romanian guns are rough as hell when new and it doesn't affect function at all

 

yeah we fired it the otherday and its super accurate, but about every second or third shot the BCG hangs up on the hammer and doesnt feed, and randomly when the BCG gets all the way to the back, it sometimes wants to jump up like its coming out of the receiver. I havent had it back out since we "reprofiled/pollished" the hammer...

Edited by RoughRider666
Link to post
Share on other sites

thats a good point, but my friend has a recent Romy G build that seems like it doenst wanna cycle too well and the BCG hangs up on the hammer a LOT even after I helped him pollish the shit out of the G2 hammer in effort to give it the same profile of the Romanian hammer...

 

well that's a build, there could be a whole host of problems with it, has he actually fired it or does it just seem rough, because all the romanian guns are rough as hell when new and it doesn't affect function at all

 

yeah we fired it the otherday and its super accurate, but about every second or third shot it hangs up on the hammer and doesnt feed, and randomly when the BCG gets all the way to the back, it sometimes wants to jump up like its coming out of the receiver. I havent had it back out since we "reprofiled/pollished" the hammer...

 

is it a home build? with the recoil spring inserted it should not be able to go back far enough to come out of the receiver, make sure your recoil spring isn't worn or the guide rod isn't broken

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats a good point, but my friend has a recent Romy G build that seems like it doenst wanna cycle too well and the BCG hangs up on the hammer a LOT even after I helped him pollish the shit out of the G2 hammer in effort to give it the same profile of the Romanian hammer...

 

well that's a build, there could be a whole host of problems with it, has he actually fired it or does it just seem rough, because all the romanian guns are rough as hell when new and it doesn't affect function at all

 

yeah we fired it the otherday and its super accurate, but about every second or third shot it hangs up on the hammer and doesnt feed, and randomly when the BCG gets all the way to the back, it sometimes wants to jump up like its coming out of the receiver. I havent had it back out since we "reprofiled/pollished" the hammer...

 

is it a home build? with the recoil spring inserted it should not be able to go back far enough to come out of the receiver, make sure your recoil spring isn't worn or the guide rod isn't broken

 

It was built from a complete numbers matching original barreled kit on a flat from Curtis. Every numbered piece on that thing matches and the headspace is perfect...

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats a good point, but my friend has a recent Romy G build that seems like it doenst wanna cycle too well and the BCG hangs up on the hammer a LOT even after I helped him pollish the shit out of the G2 hammer in effort to give it the same profile of the Romanian hammer...

 

well that's a build, there could be a whole host of problems with it, has he actually fired it or does it just seem rough, because all the romanian guns are rough as hell when new and it doesn't affect function at all

 

yeah we fired it the otherday and its super accurate, but about every second or third shot it hangs up on the hammer and doesnt feed, and randomly when the BCG gets all the way to the back, it sometimes wants to jump up like its coming out of the receiver. I havent had it back out since we "reprofiled/pollished" the hammer...

 

is it a home build? with the recoil spring inserted it should not be able to go back far enough to come out of the receiver, make sure your recoil spring isn't worn or the guide rod isn't broken

 

It was built from a complete numbers matching original barreled kit on a flat from Curtis. Every numbered piece on that thing matches and the headspace is perfect...

 

then the problem is either with the recoil spring or the receiver, possibly the rails, try swapping recoil springs and giving the parts a good polish

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats a good point, but my friend has a recent Romy G build that seems like it doenst wanna cycle too well and the BCG hangs up on the hammer a LOT even after I helped him pollish the shit out of the G2 hammer in effort to give it the same profile of the Romanian hammer...

 

well that's a build, there could be a whole host of problems with it, has he actually fired it or does it just seem rough, because all the romanian guns are rough as hell when new and it doesn't affect function at all

 

yeah we fired it the otherday and its super accurate, but about every second or third shot it hangs up on the hammer and doesnt feed, and randomly when the BCG gets all the way to the back, it sometimes wants to jump up like its coming out of the receiver. I havent had it back out since we "reprofiled/pollished" the hammer...

 

is it a home build? with the recoil spring inserted it should not be able to go back far enough to come out of the receiver, make sure your recoil spring isn't worn or the guide rod isn't broken

 

It was built from a complete numbers matching original barreled kit on a flat from Curtis. Every numbered piece on that thing matches and the headspace is perfect...

 

then the problem is either with the recoil spring or the receiver, possibly the rails, try swapping recoil springs and giving the parts a good polish

 

yeah, like I said we havent shot it since we pollished everything out yet but I can tell you that the rails are straight as an arrow because when it does cycle, its like butter. I think its the hammer itself putting too much tention on the BCG when its cocked and its forcing the BCG up and thats why the hammer needed some encouragement...its when the BCG pops up at the rear of the reciever that really worries/scares me!

Edited by RoughRider666
Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont think it would be over gassed, but swap out the RSA and go from there. something is causing it to fuck up, so its a matter of going through the process of elimination. but putting a stiffer spring in it will only prolong the inevitable and the problem will persist in the end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont think it would be over gassed, but swap out the RSA and go from there. something is causing it to fuck up, so its a matter of going through the process of elimination. but putting a stiffer spring in it will only prolong the inevitable and the problem will persist in the end.

 

Yeah, but its a ROMY G. most of those rifles were never even issued and sat in an armory somewhere and were demilled when the Soviet Union fell apart, so in theory the Romy G's are NOS and still brandnew! the Barrel, boltface & piston litterally had NEVER been shot and absolutely ZERO use and wear!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont think it would be over gassed, but swap out the RSA and go from there. something is causing it to fuck up, so its a matter of going through the process of elimination. but putting a stiffer spring in it will only prolong the inevitable and the problem will persist in the end.

 

Yeah, but its a ROMY G. most of those rifles were never even issued and sat in an armory somewhere and were demilled when the Soviet Union fell apart, so in theory the Romy G's are NOS and still brandnew! the Barrel, boltface & piston litterally had NEVER been shot and absolutely ZERO use and wear!

 

like i said, change the RSA and go from there. i may be wrong, but i still dont think you'll need a stronger one, just a new one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont think it would be over gassed, but swap out the RSA and go from there. something is causing it to fuck up, so its a matter of going through the process of elimination. but putting a stiffer spring in it will only prolong the inevitable and the problem will persist in the end.

 

Yeah, but its a ROMY G. most of those rifles were never even issued and sat in an armory somewhere and were demilled when the Soviet Union fell apart, so in theory the Romy G's are NOS and still brandnew! the Barrel, boltface & piston litterally had NEVER been shot and absolutely ZERO use and wear!

thats a good point, but my friend has a recent Romy G build that seems like it doenst wanna cycle too well and the BCG hangs up on the hammer a LOT even after I helped him pollish the shit out of the G2 hammer in effort to give it the same profile of the Romanian hammer...

 

well that's a build, there could be a whole host of problems with it, has he actually fired it or does it just seem rough, because all the romanian guns are rough as hell when new and it doesn't affect function at all

 

yeah we fired it the otherday and its super accurate, but about every second or third shot it hangs up on the hammer and doesnt feed, and randomly when the BCG gets all the way to the back, it sometimes wants to jump up like its coming out of the receiver. I havent had it back out since we "reprofiled/pollished" the hammer...

 

is it a home build? with the recoil spring inserted it should not be able to go back far enough to come out of the receiver, make sure your recoil spring isn't worn or the guide rod isn't broken

 

It was built from a complete numbers matching original barreled kit on a flat from Curtis. Every numbered piece on that thing matches and the headspace is perfect...

 

then the problem is either with the recoil spring or the receiver, possibly the rails, try swapping recoil springs and giving the parts a good polish

 

Put black marker on the op rod. i bet you the piston is hitting and wearing somewhere on the shield. mine was like this. few hits with a mallet and some polishing it worked fine. acted like a bolt hold open towards the rear.

 

yeah, like I said we havent shot it since we pollished everything out yet but I can tell you that the rails are straight as an arrow because when it does cycle, its like butter. I think its the hammer itself putting too much tention on the BCG when its cocked and its forcing the BCG up and thats why the hammer needed some encouragement...its when the BCG pops up at the rear of the reciever that really worries/scares me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like that Romy G does not like the US receiver. That is where a buffer shines, pop in a BJ buffer and it will not jump the rails. A heavier recoil spring may cause short stroking, but might be helpful in an over gassed gun-it will still impart too much energy to the bolt/carrier group when it returns to battery. Some guns already make light impressions on the primer when the bolt slams home, and a stronger return spring may be flirting with slam fires.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like that Romy G does not like the US receiver. That is where a buffer shines, pop in a BJ buffer and it will not jump the rails. A heavier recoil spring may cause short stroking, but might be helpful in an over gassed gun-it will still impart too much energy to the bolt/carrier group when it returns to battery. Some guns already make light impressions on the primer when the bolt slams home, and a stronger return spring may be flirting with slam fires.

 

its an ak-builder flat bent in an ak-builder bender... his flats/tools are supposed right on par with Russia from all my research.

Edited by RoughRider666
Link to post
Share on other sites

my post got all 8 up. i had a similar problem with a G rifle. tbe piston was hitting the guide and messing up the action. you can test it with a black marker. paint it and shoot it. you will see the wear marks and get a good idea where its hitting. might help. good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lots of receiver problems on kit builds. From too soft, holes out of spec, twisted receiver box from bad riveting - it goes on and on.

My Romy G I built on a NoDak functions perfectly - BUT even the well worn fore grip that came with the kit needed the bottom shaved to fit. NoDak is .5MM shorter in the front than the original front receiver stub that came with the parts kit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

my post got all 8 up. i had a similar problem with a G rifle. tbe piston was hitting the guide and messing up the action. you can test it with a black marker. paint it and shoot it. you will see the wear marks and get a good idea where its hitting. might help. good luck.

 

some pix would be VERY helpful, im a visual kinda guy...just sayin...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Chatbox

    Load More
    You don't have permission to chat.
×
×
  • Create New...