King Cash 104 Posted August 8, 2012 Report Share Posted August 8, 2012 Great video (WARNING: There is some gore) http://youtu.be/tku8YI68-JA 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
theorangeplanet 968 Posted August 8, 2012 Report Share Posted August 8, 2012 A little long but great video. Thanks for sharing! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
King Cash 104 Posted August 8, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2012 Yea, i usually don't watch youtube vids that are more than 5 minutes long but this one captured my attention Quote Link to post Share on other sites
U.S. Pratorean 1,234 Posted August 9, 2012 Report Share Posted August 9, 2012 All I have to do is go to work to see that. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
termite 463 Posted August 9, 2012 Report Share Posted August 9, 2012 Good video, but not as bad as I thought it'd be. The pics sent to me from the sandbox where much better. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
timy 1,185 Posted August 9, 2012 Report Share Posted August 9, 2012 34:04!!!??? That's about 33:04 longer than I can sustain an attention span. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
King Cash 104 Posted August 9, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 9, 2012 Good video, but not as bad as I thought it'd be. The pics sent to me from the sandbox where much better. Not bad at all to me, but I didn't know if mods would throw a fit if I didn't insert the disclaimer. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
storm6490 2,768 Posted August 9, 2012 Report Share Posted August 9, 2012 That's a good lecture from an anesthesiologist. His knowledge of firearms is pretty damn good. I would guess he's an enthusiast. I guess since people don't listen to soldiers who actually used the worthless piece of shit 5.56 nato, they will listen to a anesthesiologist who watches surgeons operate on handgun wounds and downloads ballistics results from youtube. Interesting points on hypotension and the surgery. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rhodes1968 1,638 Posted August 9, 2012 Report Share Posted August 9, 2012 Now do we see why the feds always want to come after those rifles? Never give those up. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
storm6490 2,768 Posted August 9, 2012 Report Share Posted August 9, 2012 Now do we see why the feds always want to come after those rifles? Never give those up. Pretty sure everybody on this forum knows that a pistol is used to fight your way back to your primary weapon. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Agent Lemon 157 Posted August 10, 2012 Report Share Posted August 10, 2012 Oh wow, what a small world. I have personally met the doc giving the lecture. He is responsible for medic/EMT/whatever training at a local hospital. I keep seeing people I know in online videos for some reason. I also run into people I know in various countries. How weird. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rhodes1968 1,638 Posted August 10, 2012 Report Share Posted August 10, 2012 Now do we see why the feds always want to come after those rifles? Never give those up. Pretty sure everybody on this forum knows that a pistol is used to fight your way back to your primary weapon. Assume nothing 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
timy 1,185 Posted August 10, 2012 Report Share Posted August 10, 2012 That's a good lecture from an anesthesiologist. His knowledge of firearms is pretty damn good. I would guess he's an enthusiast. I guess since people don't listen to soldiers who actually used the worthless piece of shit 5.56 nato, they will listen to a anesthesiologist who watches surgeons operate on handgun wounds and downloads ballistics results from youtube. Interesting points on hypotension and the surgery. I've noticed on several occasions that you've rather strongly expressed negative opinions on the 5.56. I hear the same from a lot of other military people too. So what do you think should be the primary military round? Also, what do you think of the 6.5 Grendel and 6.8 SPC? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
beefcakeb99 572 Posted August 11, 2012 Report Share Posted August 11, 2012 clearly 5.45 is the correct answer 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mostholycerebus 415 Posted August 11, 2012 Report Share Posted August 11, 2012 Wow, a 9mm feels like 10lbs dropped from .72 inches? My 9mm is getting traded ASAP. Even the .45 Golden Sabre +P didnt kill the guy. I might start saving for a SBR. I really think 7.62x39 is the answer, however our ammo selection has a long way to go. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
D.C.MORRISON 494 Posted August 11, 2012 Report Share Posted August 11, 2012 interesting, thanks for posting. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mostholycerebus 415 Posted August 12, 2012 Report Share Posted August 12, 2012 Also, re: military experience; I might not have auto capabilities, but I can load my mag with stuff better than plain FMJ. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Arik 565 Posted August 12, 2012 Report Share Posted August 12, 2012 (edited) Wow, a 9mm feels like 10lbs dropped from .72 inches? My 9mm is getting traded ASAP. Even the .45 Golden Sabre +P didnt kill the guy. I might start saving for a SBR. I really think 7.62x39 is the answer, however our ammo selection has a long way to go. NO caliber is a one shot stop guarantee. People have survived multiple high caliber shots, single shot from high caliber rifles to the head, some survived direct grenade explosions (using their body to cover the said grenade) there was even a Japanese guy who survived both atomic bombs and lived into his 80s. My friend's dad survived 4 shot to his chest from an AK47 and layed in the field bleading for a few days (Balkan war) You can sell your 9s or 45s, it doesnt matter you might as well sell everything because in the history of modern firearms i guaranty theres someone who survived every type of caliber. Edited August 12, 2012 by Arik Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ben4345 123 Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 better stock up on 7n6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
theorangeplanet 968 Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 Wow, a 9mm feels like 10lbs dropped from .72 inches? My 9mm is getting traded ASAP. Even the .45 Golden Sabre +P didnt kill the guy. I might start saving for a SBR. Better trade it for sledgehammer. .45 feels like ten pounds dropped from guess what? 1.37 inches. The point of that statement is that energy and momentum don't equate to 'stopping power' in handguns. It's about the combination of penetration and tissue destruction. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gunfun 3,931 Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 Good video. I think the overall point he was making wasn't that one handgun round was better than another, but that they all suck pretty similarly, and long arm ammo does the job. So same thing we all knew. They all usually work if you put 2-3 in the right place but nothing is a sure thing. I could tell that the Dr. is a gun guy, he talked about effectiveness instead of destructiveness, and pointed out mis-identificaiton of AKs and highlighted a classic German weapon. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
storm6490 2,768 Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 That's a good lecture from an anesthesiologist. His knowledge of firearms is pretty damn good. I would guess he's an enthusiast. I guess since people don't listen to soldiers who actually used the worthless piece of shit 5.56 nato, they will listen to a anesthesiologist who watches surgeons operate on handgun wounds and downloads ballistics results from youtube. Interesting points on hypotension and the surgery. I've noticed on several occasions that you've rather strongly expressed negative opinions on the 5.56. I hear the same from a lot of other military people too. So what do you think should be the primary military round? Also, what do you think of the 6.5 Grendel and 6.8 SPC? I would suggest the INFANTRY soldiers get 7.62 nato. We already hump a lot of weight. Reduce the weight of the shitty gear and have more room for ammo. Or, allow infantrymen to used blended metal technology and say to hell with the nato bullshit. You could probably keep the 5.56 with those rounds. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gunfun 3,931 Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 How about just decide that the geneva convention was a bit silly and let the military officially carry hollow points? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.