schultze13 354 Posted January 21, 2012 Report Share Posted January 21, 2012 Saw this today don't know if it is a repost but I don't care. I wish MDarms would of done it first but I will take what I can get. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtdgRhEauTo&feature=digest_wed Quote Link to post Share on other sites
madmax4x4 68 Posted January 21, 2012 Report Share Posted January 21, 2012 (edited) Duct tape. Edited January 21, 2012 by madmax4x4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
schultze13 354 Posted January 21, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2012 Duct tape. Yea I thought they were a little pricey too. Mikes were suppost to be around $50 but they are not out yet and I want to try one so I will suck it up. I already have several quad stacks made with "Duct tape". Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DrThunder88 912 Posted January 21, 2012 Report Share Posted January 21, 2012 I'm to the point where the concept of quad stacks are becoming more and more underwhelming. So, the 30-round quad stack...you get one 30 rounder in the space of two? What's the upside? Only having to change mags half as many times? Lighter webgear loadout (and wallet)? Maybe I'm just being grouchy because I don't use AK30 magazines and "everybody" does. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GregM1 241 Posted January 21, 2012 Report Share Posted January 21, 2012 (edited) heres more about the detachable barrel http://youtu.be/NgikWxlyOEM Edited January 21, 2012 by GregM1 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jimdigriz 580 Posted January 21, 2012 Report Share Posted January 21, 2012 (edited) I'm to the point where the concept of quad stacks are becoming more and more underwhelming. So, the 30-round quad stack...you get one 30 rounder in the space of two? What's the upside? Only having to change mags half as many times? Lighter webgear loadout (and wallet)? I see ultra high capacity mags as good first response mags in an ugly situation. If you had to change mags, you would go to a regular 30 rounder, but the larger mag would be used to start out the fight, and probably would be enough to finish it. The weight would be a non-issue because it would be rapidly getting lighter. That said, quad stack mags have to prove their reliability. For the moment, I'm happy with my 45 round AK74 mags. Edited January 21, 2012 by Jim Digriz Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hutchsaiga 93 Posted January 21, 2012 Report Share Posted January 21, 2012 Yet another way to part a moron from his money. Stick with surplus mags and an LBE. Gimmicky crap for the ak....it's sad really..I thought that was supposed to be an AR thing?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
haugpatr 972 Posted January 21, 2012 Report Share Posted January 21, 2012 Once they get above 60rds maybe. Let's see milsurp 40rd about $20, new technology 45rd for $100, sorry try again! A 30rd quadstack? Really? What is the point of that? Are there plans for a 20rd quadstack? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lbsrdi 1,078 Posted January 21, 2012 Report Share Posted January 21, 2012 If money were tight I would not get one, but I think I will try them out for the hell of it. When it comes to buying things for guns me and my money are parted quite regularly, I think I must fall into that moron category hutchsaiga spoke of. Its just money. I won't be telling my wife, I'm a moron but I'm not an idiot. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hutchsaiga 93 Posted January 21, 2012 Report Share Posted January 21, 2012 If money were tight I would not get one, but I think I will try them out for the hell of it. When it comes to buying things for guns me and my money are parted quite regularly, I think I must fall into that moron category hutchsaiga spoke of. Its just money. I won't be telling my wife, I'm a moron but I'm not an idiot. I think everyone here parts with money for firearms related purchases frequently. It's wether or not it's on something practical that decides the moron status I speak of. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lbsrdi 1,078 Posted January 21, 2012 Report Share Posted January 21, 2012 If practical purchases is the test, than I am a complete moron. Very few of my purchases are practical, gun related or otherwise. You should see my driveway, you would really disapprove. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChileRelleno 7,071 Posted January 21, 2012 Report Share Posted January 21, 2012 I'm not paying $80- 90.00 more for +5rd capacity. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BuffetDestroyer 969 Posted January 21, 2012 Report Share Posted January 21, 2012 Again don't care about quad stack at that price, but I think the application of the detachable barrel assembly is an awesome innovation... Allowing multiple barrel lengths or sight configurations with only a few seconds to swap is awesome! Not sure if that will allow conversion between 5.45 and 7.62 with the swap of a bolt and upper but that would make my dick hard! Just need mag stabilizers, but not sure if anything else is necessary. Also being able to put on a heavy DMR configuration with the new 6.5 Grendel Saiga caliber would be interesting! Hell Yeah!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
HappYBallZ 31 Posted January 21, 2012 Report Share Posted January 21, 2012 I pretty much agree with everyone here... it's neat but it being not able to disassemble plus at $100 is a too steep for me. Maybe at $40-50 I would get one. I can pretty much see that is a close copy of the Russian 40 double stacker. That break-apart AK looks pretty cool. I want to see what will come out of that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SOPMOD 254 Posted January 22, 2012 Report Share Posted January 22, 2012 Full of fail! Could have made a 60-70rd mag that would fit in an AK double mag pouch but made these pud things instead. Top that off with the fact that they probably skimped on the metal in the front catch and feed lips and you have an expensive piece of failure prone baloney. I will stick with my Circle 10 Waffles and Milsurp Steel until further notice. Oh and that takedown AK using interrupted threads instead of a camming pin like a belt-fed would is another poor execution of a decent idea. The problem seems to be that they take other people's ideas and then make the short bus version and slap a huge price tag on it. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.