shooter12 0 Posted March 6, 2008 Report Share Posted March 6, 2008 Just thought I'd share this post from the firingline.com forums. Some of you may have seen this before, but wanted to see what you guys thought about this. Looking around this forum, it's pretty clear to me that most would disagree with what I've quoted below, but just thought I'd throw it out there. Thanks "Contrary to the reports of some, it is perfectly legal to use a high-capacity magazine in an unmodified Saiga so long as no other "evil" features are added (pistol grip, flash hider, bayonet lug etc.). http://www.gunsnet.net/forums/showthread.php?t=40375 922® only applies to guns that would be banned by 925(d)(3). Of all the "evil" features in 925(d)(3) a Saiga only has the detatchable magazine which is specifically excluded from the list of banned features. Neither 922® nor 925(d)(3) makes any mention of magazine capacity. Magazine capacity is only addressed in 922(v) otherwise known as the Assault Weapons Ban and that is, for the time being, expired. So, as long as you don't add any other "evil" features, you can use high capacity magazines in your Saiga and still be legal." source Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Leo.Kermes 1 Posted March 6, 2008 Report Share Posted March 6, 2008 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
22_Shooter 1,560 Posted March 6, 2008 Report Share Posted March 6, 2008 Kinda interesting, but I have no reason to test it. Gaining compliance is so easy, I'm not gonna risk it, on some gray area. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ClickClickD'oh 1 Posted March 6, 2008 Report Share Posted March 6, 2008 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
nalioth 405 Posted March 6, 2008 Report Share Posted March 6, 2008 There is an ATF letter out there somewhere that concerns the Ruger Mini-14 and what constitutes 'sporting purpose'. I found it once and have not been able to find it again. When I do find it, I will be sharing it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jack A Sol 2 Posted March 7, 2008 Report Share Posted March 7, 2008 (edited) Edited March 8, 2008 by Jack A Sol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ClickClickD'oh 1 Posted March 7, 2008 Report Share Posted March 7, 2008 The way I read the current law is, that because the saiga is not identical to a rifle which is prohibited from import, There's the basis of your problem. The ATF considers Saigas of all types to be "AK type" weapons and therefore prohibited to be removed from the approved sporting configurations (inclusion of a high capacity feeding device) without part number compliance. It doesn't matter where the magazine was made or if it is of a military type. High Capacity magazines = non-sporting. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tman2007sc 0 Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jack A Sol 2 Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 (edited) The way I read the current law is, that because the saiga is not identical to a rifle which is prohibited from import, There's the basis of your problem. The ATF considers Saigas of all types to be "AK type" weapons and therefore prohibited to be removed from the approved sporting configurations (inclusion of a high capacity feeding device) without part number compliance. It doesn't matter where the magazine was made or if it is of a military type. High Capacity magazines = non-sporting. That's not what the current ATF rulings state at all!! Back up your assertion with some links, or rulings. I have documented and linked every assertion I have made. the ATF has stated exactly as I assert above. i am using THIER OWN WORDS in this matter. ATF rulings I link above clearly state that the magazine used cannot be of a type used or designed for a military weapon. Your assertion that the atf claims that all saigas cant be removed from sporting config without 922r compliance is fine, but it doesnt apply because the mags that I specifically state (fbmg and surfire plastics) do not qualify as "large capacity military magazines". They were designed for a SPORTING RIFLE AND NOT A MILITARY GUN. Therefore they do not make the saiga a "prohibited weapon to import" when used. if they did, then import would have been stopped. Check this ruling out: http://www.atf.gov/pub/treas_pub/assault_rifles/determin.pdf Certain semiautomatic assault rifles that failed the 1989 sporting purposes test weremodified to remove all of the military configuration features, except for the ability to accept a detachable magazine. Significantly, most of these modified rifles not only still have the ability to accept a detachable magazine but, more specifically, still have the ability to accept a large capacity military magazine. It appears that only one of the current study rifles, the VEPR caliber .308 (an AK47 variant), does not have the ability to accept a large capacity military magazine and, therefore, is not an LCMM rifle. Based on the standard developed in 1989, these modified rifles were found not to fall within the semiautomatic assault rifle type and were found to meet the sporting purposes test. Accordingly, these rifles were approved for import into the United States. I think you are still getting confused by all the assault weapons ban stuff still floating around. the high capacity mag is no longer a prohibited feature for imported guns or any guns for that matter. the new test according to the ATF rulings is the "large capacity military magazines", which the saiga clearly passes as it cannot use a military magazine of any type as it is imported. There is still a lot of myth and jailhouse lawyer crap out there and no-one other than myself has presented the evidence in an accessible and easy to understand format. most "experts" dont back up thier assertions with anything as all. If you can prove that I'm wrong I'll change my tune, but it better be information from an official source and not some 6 year old quote from an NRA website. I've presented firsthand evidence to back up my claim, I want the real deal from you too. Edited March 8, 2008 by Jack A Sol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Vultite 57 Posted March 9, 2008 Report Share Posted March 9, 2008 (edited) I don't believe this even up for argumentation....if FFL holders can't configure guns that way, i wouldn't argue with a liscence holder...i say, do what you want, if you get questioned, let us know how it works out. we'll make sure Butterfingers goes easy on you the first night. I'm not sure if you could convince a jury of your peers the difference between a 30rd "military" mag and a 30rd surefire mag, they would say its the same thing, works the same way, wtf is the difference? you can hunt with any mag, as long as it holds 1 round, but hi cap mag which is anything over 10 rounds for a rifle, is considered unsporting and "military" so, even though its a opinion, you can be the tester if you want. I'd rather play it safe and not get a probe up my ass Edited March 9, 2008 by Vultite Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gunrunner123 0 Posted March 9, 2008 Report Share Posted March 9, 2008 I apologize in advance if this is out of context ,,,, Besides me notifing ATF of my modified or unmodified status is there anyway that ATF would be aware that I had a modified saiga? Does Tromix or any other gunsmith service have to or are they required to notify of the changes made to specific serial#..? Ken Quote Link to post Share on other sites
nalioth 405 Posted March 9, 2008 Report Share Posted March 9, 2008 (edited) I apologize in advance if this is out of context ,,,, Besides me notifing ATF of my modified or unmodified status is there anyway that ATF would be aware that I had a modified saiga? Does Tromix or any other gunsmith service have to or are they required to notify of the changes made to specific serial#..? Ken No, when you screw up badly and they seize your house and property is when it is usually found out. Maybe if you're involved in a traffic stop gone badly. There have been no prosecutions of 922r violations that anyone has heard of, but I'm sure that if you screw up badly enough, they'll add 'em to your list if they can. Edited March 9, 2008 by nalioth Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jack A Sol 2 Posted March 10, 2008 Report Share Posted March 10, 2008 (edited) I don't believe this even up for argumentation....if FFL holders can't configure guns that way, i wouldn't argue with a liscence holder...i say, do what you want, if you get questioned, let us know how it works out. we'll make sure Butterfingers goes easy on you the first night. I'm not sure if you could convince a jury of your peers the difference between a 30rd "military" mag and a 30rd surefire mag, they would say its the same thing, works the same way, wtf is the difference? you can hunt with any mag, as long as it holds 1 round, but hi cap mag which is anything over 10 rounds for a rifle, is considered unsporting and "military" so, even though its a opinion, you can be the tester if you want. I'd rather play it safe and not get a probe up my ass If you are right and I am wrong then ALL UNMODIFIED SAIGAS ARE ILLEGAL!! This would be a fact if there was no distinction made legally between the surefires and regular AK mags. If what you are so sure of is true then every saiga would be "capable of using large capacity military magazines" and thus would be banned from importation. There is a clear distinction made in the law and ATF rulings when it comes to the wording and intent of the LCMM capability ban. these guns were approved for import in spite of the exisstance of these mags, therefore the .gov has admittted that it is legal to use these mags in unmodified guns!! It's real easy to take the cop out and say "it's your ass dude, do what ya want" If you want to live your life not doing things because they MAY be illegal then thats fine with me, but dont dismiss my argument, that I have thoroughly backed with rulings and law, as invalid because of your fear issues with the .gov. Edited March 10, 2008 by Jack A Sol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
vjor 2 Posted March 10, 2008 Report Share Posted March 10, 2008 (edited) jack a sol has a really good point there, yes as a mag was made or desing for the sole use on the saiga rifle not as a military gun his point is valid. I was looking into it my self as much as I hate not military specs mags, the point is that the Saiga mags will work on the saiga gun been a sporter rifle and were made specially for that gun in particular, leaving the use of them on military weapons out of the box. I was asking some one that does Pro work about it, well been that he got a letter from the ATF after he ask them about he making the guns into a military weapon look alike. He told me that he send the letter to the ATF to ok his guns and use of American made parts only because he uses military mags on his guns, changing the gun to accept any mags no just the ones made for the rifle in sporterize form do changing the rifle to take any high cap mag. No just the ones made for the gun itself or design to work on that gun in particular. Opps I will ad that the changing of the gun itself from sporting to AKM rifle have to be look into, use of American parts. Well I have preach about 922 and other stuff, but I have been checking this too lately about the use of high cap mag on a Saiga been that the mag was design to work on the gun itself and the mags was solely design for that gun as is imported into the country. That little built in ramp on the front of the mags can change a lot how the ATF look into the use of high cap on the rifle as it is cause the design is made for the Saiga not other AK rifles, the Saiga been a sporter rifle on its own. In few if a mag is made for the sole use on a particular gun and design for that gun in particular things can change a lot, but who knows if the ATF make a rule and change stuff, but like I say jack a sol has a point as we stand right now to this day at this time 3/10/2008. In few anything say about 922 goes out the door unless you change your gun to take any other rifle high cap mags or change the gun into a AKM look a like . Or the ATF pass a ruling on the use of mags design for the Saiga specifically. The world make no sense lately, and things change and I am on my way to get me a cigar. take the above post as you like it, do I care about people using compliant parts on there guns nope, do I use compliant parts on my guns yup but I use any military mags and my guns don't look sporterized any more. Carlo. PS: It dont mean that you can change a AK mag into a Saiga mag, the mag have to be born as a Saiga mag if it is a high cap mag or go American parts if use any other AK mags. Edited March 10, 2008 by vjor Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RangerM9 1 Posted March 10, 2008 Report Share Posted March 10, 2008 I don't believe this even up for argumentation....if FFL holders can't configure guns that way, i wouldn't argue with a liscence holder...i say, do what you want, if you get questioned, let us know how it works out. we'll make sure Butterfingers goes easy on you the first night. I'm not sure if you could convince a jury of your peers the difference between a 30rd "military" mag and a 30rd surefire mag, they would say its the same thing, works the same way, wtf is the difference? you can hunt with any mag, as long as it holds 1 round, but hi cap mag which is anything over 10 rounds for a rifle, is considered unsporting and "military" so, even though its a opinion, you can be the tester if you want. I'd rather play it safe and not get a probe up my ass If you are right and I am wrong then ALL UNMODIFIED SAIGAS ARE ILLEGAL!! This would be a fact if there was no distinction made legally between the surefires and regular AK mags. If what you are so sure of is true then every saiga would be "capable of using large capacity military magazines" and thus would be banned from importation. There is a clear distinction made in the law and ATF rulings when it comes to the wording and intent of the LCMM capability ban. these guns were approved for import in spite of the exisstance of these mags, therefore the .gov has admittted that it is legal to use these mags in unmodified guns!! It's real easy to take the cop out and say "it's your ass dude, do what ya want" If you want to live your life not doing things because they MAY be illegal then thats fine with me, but dont dismiss my argument, that I have thoroughly backed with rulings and law, as invalid because of your fear issues with the .gov. is your contention that now with Surefire mags all saigas can have high cap mags without modification and are thus illegal?....the guns were approved for importation long before the surefire mags came along.....prior to that you had to modify the gun to use standard AK mags. I would worry now that with hi caps (which require no modification to the gun) available the ATF may revisit the saiga issue and ban them completely.... but as imported, they are legal. Just as a 870 shotgun is legal for sale, it is when the user modifies it to become a SBS without a stamp that it becomes illegal. (same as putting a surefire 30rnder on a stock saiga. Jesus, swap out one part and use surefires and you are legal no matter what......just do it and cover your ass. As for talking to the cop.....he's going to leave that legal shit to the DA's office and not give you another thought. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ClickClickD'oh 1 Posted March 10, 2008 Report Share Posted March 10, 2008 That's not what the current ATF rulings state at all!! Back up your assertion with some links, or rulings. Please read the thread. The post immediately prior to yours contains a letter from the ATF stating exactly that. It is only one of many letters from the ATF that have been posted on this forum. The members of this forum did not just invent their position on 922r because they want to be junior internet Perry Masons. It has come from several direct correspondances with the ATF. I suggest the folks over at warrior talk do the same thing. There is a huge differance between, "I read the applicable laws", and "I asked the authoritative body for their interpretation and enforcement of the applicable laws." This smells of the usual income tax garbage.. that is, people who have read just enough of the law to get themsleves into serious trouble. Legal technicality: Now that you have been informed of the letter from the ATF you are considered to by duly advised of the legalities involved with this particular firearm and modification and can no longer protest ignorance or misunderstanding if prosecuted for this matter. The internet is a bitch that way. In case you want another: http://forum.saiga-12.com/index.php?showtopic=19536 If you are right and I am wrong then ALL UNMODIFIED SAIGAS ARE ILLEGAL!!No, you are wrong again. In the ATFs own words, determination of suitability for sporting purposes will be made on a case by case basis as weapons are applied for importation. Determinations regarding the suitability for sporting purposes are made on acase-by-case base and often will require review by the Firearms Technology Branch. This means that you can not make a simple blanket application of previous determinations in order to decalare, yourself, that a weapon is in a legal configuration. The import configuration of the Saiga is the approved, legal, configuration. Removing it from that configuration (hi-capacity magazines) is when 922r begins to apply. Yes, that does mean the ATF has a large amount of discretion when making a determination. In case you want to keep arguing this.. how about a court ruling? http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getc...DC/005409a.html The long, and short answer is... The Saiga was approved for import without hi-capacity magazines. Adding hi-capacity magazines removes them from the approved import configurations and thus makes 922r applicable, requiring parts number compliance. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
nalioth 405 Posted March 10, 2008 Report Share Posted March 10, 2008 (edited) You guys are all missing the point here: The Master Molder mag will not work in the .223/7.62x39 Saiga w/o modification. It was not designed for the Saiga, but by chance, has a thicker upper 'lip' that provides reasonable function (after mag catch/latch mods) w/o a bullet guide. The bulgarian waffle mags are also known to have the 'thick lip'. Edited March 10, 2008 by nalioth Quote Link to post Share on other sites
vjor 2 Posted March 10, 2008 Report Share Posted March 10, 2008 (edited) Yes you guys have a valid point too, naliot you right, like I say in my post have to be design for the Saiga specifically and you cant mod the gun in any way to take the mag forget abut pistol grips or feed ramp or anything. And yes the gun as it comes is proof enough of sporterizing purpose but the gun cant be mod at all, as right now the only gun that have see that will take a saiga specifically mag is the Saiga.223 because surefire mag made specifically made for that gun that I have seen and will don't work OK in any other gun unless the other gun is mod to take it, cause of the ramp on the mag itself. I don't know of the .308 cause I haven't test any yet. ClickClickD'oh you are right and have valid points there too, one thing I have look into is that the Saiga as it comes from factory has no one military specs and proof of sporterize purpose, not like other guns that have come with pistol grips of other features consider by the ATF military style configuration or can take ready available military mags on the market with out mods to the gun. If a month ago any one would told me that I can use high caps on a Saiga with out American parts, I will tell them they were nuts but things have change a little. Any way we are here to exchange ideas and points that is what a gun forum supposed to be for . Man I still put American parts on my guns no matter what but is valid points all over. Edited March 10, 2008 by vjor Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tman2007sc 0 Posted March 10, 2008 Report Share Posted March 10, 2008 (edited) Edited March 10, 2008 by tman2007sc Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jack A Sol 2 Posted March 10, 2008 Report Share Posted March 10, 2008 (edited) Edited March 10, 2008 by Jack A Sol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tman2007sc 0 Posted March 10, 2008 Report Share Posted March 10, 2008 (edited) Edited March 10, 2008 by tman2007sc Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ClickClickD'oh 1 Posted March 10, 2008 Report Share Posted March 10, 2008 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tman2007sc 0 Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 Plain and simple. http://www.atf.gov/firearms/assault/pdf/exec.pdf The whole point of the 1998 ban is to prevent more high capacity rifles from being imported. They do not differenciate between high capacity military or high capacity nonmilitary magazine. The 1998 ban is based on the intent of the 1994 ban which also bans all high capacity mags. Jack write the ATF yourself and post the letter they send back. I will bet the farm that they will, once again, state that you cannot insert any kind of high capacity magazine into a currently sold stock Saiga factory rifle. Be sure to clearly write if it would be legal to use a 30 round surefire (non-military) magazine in a stock SAiga rifle. Several of us already know what they will respond. But, for the interest of putting this same topic (which comes up every month) to rest, write the letter and please post the answer they provide on this board. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jack A Sol 2 Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 (edited) Edited March 11, 2008 by Jack A Sol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ClickClickD'oh 1 Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 Please show me the determination for import by ATF which states that it cannot use ANY high capacity magazines then. It's pretty clear to me that you are unable to grasp the concept that there is a difference legally, by the ATF rulings I have linked and the ones you have linked, between a military magazine and a non military magazine. The state department and the ATF have already made all the determinations we need by specifically approving for import the Saiga as we get it from russia. There simply is not a current ruling or law (that you have shown me) that says you can not insert a non military ( like the surefire plastic) mag into a bone stock saiga rifle or shotgun. if there is then please show me somewhere where in CURRENT LAW it specifically states that ALL high capacity mags are verboten, and does not limit the ruling to LCMM military mags!! it just aint there. I dont know what else I can say to help you understand the difference between an AK mag and a Surefire mag. they just aint the same thing legally. the surefire was designed solely for a sporting weapon and THAT FACT makes all the difference in the world. Look, if you want to keep believing that the ATF is going to make a distinction between a Bulgy mag and a Surefire mag then be my guest and follow tman2007sc's advice and send the ATF a letter asking for clarification. Please post it here when you get the response. It's no skin off my back if you persist in making illegal modifications to firearms based on a faulty pretense. But hey, I could be wrong. The ATF could say it's okay. But my guess is that they are going to say that a hi-capacity magazine deisgned to be used in a rifle they have already determined to be of a military type is a military magazine no matter what the manufacture says that it is for. If you do get that letter, I'd make photo-copies of it and carry it every where your rifle goes. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ClickClickD'oh 1 Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 This may save you some time writing the ATF. Large Capacity Military Magazine defined: http://www.atf.gov/pub/treas_pub/assault_rifles/suitabil.pdf The ability to accept a detachable large capacity magazine that was originallydesigned and produced for one of the following military assault rifles: AK47, FNFAL, HK91 or 93, SIG SG550, or Uzi. And yes, the Saiga is, according to the ATF, and AK47 variant: http://www.atf.gov/pub/treas_pub/assault_rifles/exh2.pdf So, the argument that the Surefire magazine is designed for a sporting rifle won't fly with the ATF since according to their own publications it was designed for an AK47 variant weapon and thus falls under the classification as a LCMM. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jack A Sol 2 Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 (edited) This may save you some time writing the ATF. Large Capacity Military Magazine defined: http://www.atf.gov/pub/treas_pub/assault_rifles/suitabil.pdf The ability to accept a detachable large capacity magazine that was originallydesigned and produced for one of the following military assault rifles: AK47, FNFAL, HK91 or 93, SIG SG550, or Uzi. And yes, the Saiga is, according to the ATF, and AK47 variant: http://www.atf.gov/pub/treas_pub/assault_rifles/exh2.pdf So, the argument that the Surefire magazine is designed for a sporting rifle won't fly with the ATF since according to their own publications it was designed for an AK47 variant weapon and thus falls under the classification as a LCMM. 1- the surefire plastic was not designed or used for the AK47 nor can it be used in an AK47. the mags are not interchangeable. 2-just because the saiga is an AK variant doesnt make it a "military assault rifle". The ATF has determined that the Saiga is a SPORTING rifle because of it's absence of military features. I see where you are going with that, but you are not quite there yet, the LCMM definition is still hanging you up.. you are getting closer Edited March 11, 2008 by Jack A Sol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
nalioth 405 Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 1- the surefire plastic was not designed or used for the AK47 nor can it be used in an AK47. the mags are not interchangeable. Wait, what? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
soberups 1 Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 I called the ATF and I also wrote them a letter, I will try to find the darn thing and post it here, but it said on no uncertain terms that it is NOT legal to stick a hi-cap mag...even a US-made one-- into a Saiga unless you get your parts down to 10 or less. I have it, in writing, on ATF letterhead. I'm not interested in paying a lawyer to prove them wrong, its a lot easier to just bolt on a Tapco modified stock for $99 and call it good. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ClickClickD'oh 1 Posted March 11, 2008 Report Share Posted March 11, 2008 1- the surefire plastic was not designed or used for the AK47 nor can it be used in an AK47. the mags are not interchangeable.Yes, the ATF considers the Saiga to be an AK47 variant, therefore the Surefire magazine, according to the ATF, was designed to be used in an AK47 type rifle. 2-just because the saiga is an AK variant doesnt make it a "military assault rifle". The ATF has determined that the Saiga is a SPORTING rifle because of it's absence of military features. Do you want to read that second link again. The ATF clearly classifies the Saiga as an AK variant, and the ATF says that all AK variants are classified as miltary assualt rifles. How much more clear does it have to be for you? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.