james lambert 3,059 Posted September 26, 2014 Report Share Posted September 26, 2014 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
thebuns1 4,323 Posted September 26, 2014 Report Share Posted September 26, 2014 Buckle up or our government enforcement agents will initiate a stop because they care about you. And because they care, search your vehicle to make sure you don't have any non-government approved vegetables or plants on your person. If so, here's a loving knee in the back to protect you. Dont forget the broken arm for "not complying" with an order. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Big John! 2,062 Posted September 27, 2014 Report Share Posted September 27, 2014 fuck, of course cooper's nose disappears, he's a reptilian shapeshifter, that was grown by the Illuminati at a secret lab in the bohemian grove. everybody knows that. but, did you know that rocky the flying squirrel is bad at judging distances? I knew neither of these. I think the video of Rocky was green screened. There is no fucking way he's bad at judging distances and anyone that says so is a moron. As for Cooper... This explains a lot. I feel much better now. Thanks Hopkins! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
IndyArms 10,186 Posted September 27, 2014 Report Share Posted September 27, 2014 This did not change the hearts and minds of gun owners or constitutionalists. We know just as well why our rights HAVE to be protected this strengthens our resolve. The libs are still just the same, no change there. It didnt spark new anti gun legislation. Actually... YES IT DID.... The NY S.A.F.E. act was a DIRECT "knee jerk" legislation response to the " sandy hook incident", illegally and unconstitutionally rammed through in the middle of the night, criminalizing millions of previously law abiding citizens, virtually overnight!!! Dont give me that " no legislation came of it" B.S. And while we are at it... lets keep the CHILDISHNESS at bay, please.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
YOT 3,743 Posted September 27, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 27, 2014 This did not change the hearts and minds of gun owners or constitutionalists. We know just as well why our rights HAVE to be protected this strengthens our resolve. The libs are still just the same, no change there. It didnt spark new anti gun legislation. Actually... YES IT DID.... The NY S.A.F.E. act was a DIRECT "knee jerk" legislation response to the " sandy hook incident", illegally and unconstitutionally rammed through in the middle of the night, criminalizing millions of previously law abiding citizens, virtually overnight!!! Dont give me that " no legislation came of it" B.S. And while we are at it... lets keep the CHILDISHNESS at bay, please.... This may mean a bit more to us, Indy. It's way more real than a conspiracy theory when you experience the outcome. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Big John! 2,062 Posted September 27, 2014 Report Share Posted September 27, 2014 This did not change the hearts and minds of gun owners or constitutionalists. We know just as well why our rights HAVE to be protected this strengthens our resolve. The libs are still just the same, no change there. It didnt spark new anti gun legislation. Actually... YES IT DID.... The NY S.A.F.E. act was a DIRECT "knee jerk" legislation response to the " sandy hook incident", illegally and unconstitutionally rammed through in the middle of the night, criminalizing millions of previously law abiding citizens, virtually overnight!!! Dont give me that " no legislation came of it" B.S. And while we are at it... lets keep the CHILDISHNESS at bay, please.... Good call Indy... Sorry. And thanks for not damning the thread to fight club. Sometimes I get a little carried away. I'll go clean up my mess. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Big John! 2,062 Posted September 27, 2014 Report Share Posted September 27, 2014 Dont forget, his body was creamated and the ashes "hidden". Thats a convienent way to make sure the body is never exhumed and re examined/toxicology screened. That is exactly why it was done, and the building razed.... to hide evidence. What body? Is there a photograph anywhere on the whole www that shows him alive or dead in that school? That's really saying something as I could probably find a pic of you picking your nose if I worked hard enough. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
vepr12x 89 Posted September 27, 2014 Report Share Posted September 27, 2014 Dont forget, his body was creamated and the ashes "hidden". Thats a convienent way to make sure the body is never exhumed and re examined/toxicology screened. That is exactly why it was done, and the building razed.... to hide evidence. What body? Is there a photograph anywhere on the whole www that shows him alive or dead in that school? That's really saying something as I could probably find a pic of you picking your nose if I worked hard enough. His death certificate was issued the day before sandyhook shooting. 12/13 according to ssdi records. So there had to be a body of some sorts. Youre right there are no pics of his body inside of the school dead or alive. Even if his body was in the building, considering his death certificate says he died the day before, it was likely planted post mortem. Regardless its claimed that his body has since been creamated and the ashes "hidden" which is a real convienent way to destroy evidence and eliminate the chance of a re examination. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Big John! 2,062 Posted September 27, 2014 Report Share Posted September 27, 2014 His supposed body met the same fate as the school. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gunman1 1,753 Posted September 27, 2014 Report Share Posted September 27, 2014 You're all just racist conspiracy nut jobs....now just walk away before you get disappeared too Quote Link to post Share on other sites
YOT 3,743 Posted September 27, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 27, 2014 Dont forget, his body was creamated and the ashes "hidden". Thats a convienent way to make sure the body is never exhumed and re examined/toxicology screened. That is exactly why it was done, and the building razed.... to hide evidence. What body? Is there a photograph anywhere on the whole www that shows him alive or dead in that school? That's really saying something as I could probably find a pic of you picking your nose if I worked hard enough. I didn't say there was a body. See how that works? Your mind thought that, but what I meant was that there was implied evidence that went away with a reported cremation, whether or not there was. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Big John! 2,062 Posted September 27, 2014 Report Share Posted September 27, 2014 Dont forget, his body was creamated and the ashes "hidden". Thats a convienent way to make sure the body is never exhumed and re examined/toxicology screened. That is exactly why it was done, and the building razed.... to hide evidence. What body? Is there a photograph anywhere on the whole www that shows him alive or dead in that school? That's really saying something as I could probably find a pic of you picking your nose if I worked hard enough. I didn't say there was a body. See how that works? Your mind thought that, but what I meant was that there was implied evidence that went away with a reported cremation, whether or not there was. You sure didn't. Vepr did. Valid point though. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gunman1 1,753 Posted September 27, 2014 Report Share Posted September 27, 2014 'Well, where is the corpus delicti, old chap?' W. J. Burley, 1991 means literally 'the body of a crime', and refers to all the facts and circumstances that together constitute a breach of the law. In lay use, it means the concrete evidence of a crime, especially the body of a murdered person. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Matthew Hopkins 1,065 Posted September 27, 2014 Report Share Posted September 27, 2014 'Well, where is the corpus delicti, old chap?' W. J. Burley, 1991 well, here is a corpus delicti-ous, which is much, much nicer 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
vepr12x 89 Posted September 28, 2014 Report Share Posted September 28, 2014 I agree with you John, there is no evidence that his body was actually in the building. No photos of a body, no video of him entering the school, inside the school or anywhere near the school. There isnt any evidence of any bodies. There was a death certificate issued for lanza and its dated 12/13/2012 the day before the shooting. So if his body was in fact there it was most likely planted, also there is no known burial spot that could potentially be exhumed and the "body" re examined/autopsy. I believe this was done strategically to create a dead end. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Big John! 2,062 Posted September 28, 2014 Report Share Posted September 28, 2014 'Well, where is the corpus delicti, old chap?' W. J. Burley, 1991 means literally 'the body of a crime', and refers to all the facts and circumstances that together constitute a breach of the law. In lay use, it means the concrete evidence of a crime, especially the body of a murdered person. The supposed parents were not allowed to see their kids. Thus no corpus delicti my friend. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
poolingmyignorance 2,191 Posted September 28, 2014 Report Share Posted September 28, 2014 (edited) I got a crazier explanation. Let's say the kids never existed. (just spit balling here, so bare with me) How many kids went to that school? 500?700? 1,000? I dunno. My daughters school is only 1000, we only knows handfull of other parents, they only knows handful of other parents. So let's say one day we pulled up to school they got it wrapped off. And they say 20 kids died. Gives list of names, and a group of "parents" to stand out there and cry frantically. Why wouldn't you belive 20 kids died. All they ever had to do was before the year started add a few additional names to the school attendance roster. Add a few photos of some children pulled from who knows where. Viola! You just fabricated 20 casualties. When you only needed to kill a loner schizo and his aging mother. Who is really going to go back pull all the school records and compare them to actual class room attendance records? It would be easy enough, and the police? Put them out there for crowd control, and in a few who are in on everything for the show and the cops left outside won't question much,cause they don't know everything the man in charge does. They don't know, don't care. Edited September 28, 2014 by poolingmyignorance 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
D.C.MORRISON 494 Posted September 28, 2014 Report Share Posted September 28, 2014 Now you are really thinking. 600+ students. Where were they? How did they get evacuated? No one in authority will answer even one pertainate question. https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=fqXUNWD98kQ 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Big John! 2,062 Posted September 28, 2014 Report Share Posted September 28, 2014 I don't think this is as hard as people portray it to be. If people believe people like Gene Rosen, it gets very simple from there. I still think shit like this has been going on forever. It's just with the waking of the net, and 92 million people without jobs to scour said net, that they are getting noticed. I was asked if I thought the Boston Bombing was faked. The answer is no... Something blew up. Just not as the official narrative says it did. There's a great video on this out there and I couldn't find it. But, the video I posted about people getting their pants blown to shreds without a scratch or exposing their junk is pretty damn telling in itself. How does this happen? If I were to post the same video and tell everyone that my friends and I set off a bomb in my kitchen and showed similar (non) injuries, I'd be told I was full o' shit. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
vepr12x 89 Posted September 28, 2014 Report Share Posted September 28, 2014 (edited) I got a crazier explanation. Let's say the kids never existed. (just spit balling here, so bare with me) How many kids went to that school? 500?700? 1,000? I dunno. My daughters school is only 1000, we only knows handfull of other parents, they only knows handful of other parents. So let's say one day we pulled up to school they got it wrapped off. And they say 20 kids died. Gives list of names, and a group of "parents" to stand out there and cry frantically. Why wouldn't you belive 20 kids died. All they ever had to do was before the year started add a few additional names to the school attendance roster. Add a few photos of some children pulled from who knows where. Viola! You just fabricated 20 casualties. When you only needed to kill a loner schizo and his aging mother. Who is really going to go back pull all the school records and compare them to actual class room attendance records? It would be easy enough, and the police? Put them out there for crowd control, and in a few who are in on everything for the show and the cops left outside won't question much,cause they don't know everything the man in charge does. They don't know, don't care. Makes perfect sense. And convienently for them everything is sealed and classified and they wont answer questions. Wolfgang Halbig has spent $15,000 on freedom of information requests, without a single response to simple questions. Supposedly sandyhook had recently had top of the line security system installed, but they cant produce any still shots or video? But they quickly released still shots with columbine. Edited September 28, 2014 by vepr12x 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
storm6490 2,768 Posted September 29, 2014 Report Share Posted September 29, 2014 What the fuck is 0? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spartacus 1,619 Posted September 29, 2014 Report Share Posted September 29, 2014 What the fuck is 0? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
james lambert 3,059 Posted September 29, 2014 Report Share Posted September 29, 2014 What the fuck is 0? just deleted comments of no particular significance Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Big John! 2,062 Posted October 12, 2014 Report Share Posted October 12, 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-BDyOuZq4sA 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
vepr12x 89 Posted October 12, 2014 Report Share Posted October 12, 2014 (edited) http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/james-comey-fbi-citizens-government/2014/10/10/id/600072/#ixzz3FwYk4MPB Fbi chief says "citizens should be deeply skeptical of government". How did this "tinfoil nutjob" slip through the cracks to become fbi chief?? He must be a domestic terrorist. Link fixed Edited October 12, 2014 by vepr12x Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gunman1 1,753 Posted October 12, 2014 Report Share Posted October 12, 2014 Sum-ting-wong-wi-U-linky Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.