Jump to content

MythBusters Confirmation: Bullet Dropped vs Bullet Fired


Recommended Posts

I hadn't seen this one, and thought it was cool since it involved firearms.

I know MythBusters can really fudge some of their 'scientific' tests, but the show is fun to watch.

 

The Myth: If you were to drop a bullet at the same time you fire a bullet, from the same height, they would both hit the ground at the same time.

The Physics: When fired on the horizontal, no ballistic arc, a bullet begins to drop immediately, and regardless of its horizontal speed, it's vertical drop speed is the same as the dropped.

Status: Confirmed

 

They used a 1911 .45acp, fired horizontally from a approx height of 3', full scale range, with downrange impact at approx 360'.

The bullet is dropped within .3 of a millisecond, the fired bullet hit the ground within 39.6 milliseconds of the dropped hitting the ground.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And confirmed by Newton a few years before...

Well, there is that... But there are enough people that will argue defined facts on any matter. :rolleyes:

Go to a range and pose this as a question, bet you get some naysayers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

She's great to look at, but annoying. "Look at me! I'm CUTE!" only gets you so far.

 

 

If it got her as far as my bedroom, I could care less! :lolol:

 

Don't forget...the sight of meat makes her sick!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, if the bullet traveled fast enough (it doesn't), it could go into what would technically be called orbit (it just means that the rate of it falling is cancelled out by the curve of the earth). Unfortunately, the bullet would have to travel around 20,000 fps (maybe even more, just giving a rough estimation) to do this. However, with this test, I actually disagree. Because Earth is not flat, you can't say that they will both hit at the same time, because technically when you fire a bullet horizontally to earth's surface, you are firing at a VERY slight ballistic angle. I'll rephrase it if you don't understand what I am saying :P

Link to post
Share on other sites

She's great to look at, but annoying. "Look at me! I'm CUTE!" only gets you so far.

 

 

If it got her as far as my bedroom, I could care less! :lolol:

 

Don't forget...the sight of meat makes her sick!

 

Wrap your dick in lettuce. Problem solved! :lolol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, if the bullet traveled fast enough (it doesn't), it could go into what would technically be called orbit (it just means that the rate of it falling is cancelled out by the curve of the earth). Unfortunately, the bullet would have to travel around 20,000 fps (maybe even more, just giving a rough estimation) to do this. However, with this test, I actually disagree. Because Earth is not flat, you can't say that they will both hit at the same time, because technically when you fire a bullet horizontally to earth's surface, you are firing at a VERY slight ballistic angle. I'll rephrase it if you don't understand what I am saying :P

 

You're correct. But I would mention that would imply that the bullet was fired on a path tangent to the Earth's surface,at the same altitude as the dropped bullet. At that shallow of an angle, the effects of air as friction would cause a variable amount of drag on the bullet, as well as the direction of the shot in relation to the motion of the planet.

 

But, to just deal with the earths curvature, we can abuse this calculator. http://www.boatsafe.com/tools/horizon.htm

 

Put in the altitude of the shot/drop... get the distance... compute the time the drop will take to hit the ground. Distance divided by time, and you get the idea of the speeds required to make a difference. Ballistics are a hoot!

 

Pi is 3.14159265359...

 

We use 3.14....

 

22/7 constructed everything in Rome...

 

Sometimes, the difference isn't worth calculating. But I agree, it can still be fun to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, if the bullet traveled fast enough (it doesn't), it could go into what would technically be called orbit (it just means that the rate of it falling is cancelled out by the curve of the earth). Unfortunately, the bullet would have to travel around 20,000 fps (maybe even more, just giving a rough estimation) to do this. However, with this test, I actually disagree. Because Earth is not flat, you can't say that they will both hit at the same time, because technically when you fire a bullet horizontally to earth's surface, you are firing at a VERY slight ballistic angle. I'll rephrase it if you don't understand what I am saying :P

 

You're correct. But I would mention that would imply that the bullet was fired on a path tangent to the Earth's surface,at the same altitude as the dropped bullet. At that shallow of an angle, the effects of air as friction would cause a variable amount of drag on the bullet, as well as the direction of the shot in relation to the motion of the planet.

 

But, to just deal with the earths curvature, we can abuse this calculator. http://www.boatsafe....ols/horizon.htm

 

Put in the altitude of the shot/drop... get the distance... compute the time the drop will take to hit the ground. Distance divided by time, and you get the idea of the speeds required to make a difference. Ballistics are a hoot!

 

Pi is 3.14159265359...

 

We use 3.14....

 

22/7 constructed everything in Rome...

 

Sometimes, the difference isn't worth calculating. But I agree, it can still be fun to do.

 

i understand youre thoughts and i also agree , when i watched the show i guess i never put to much more thought into it to dispute thier finding,s . had they contemplated these factors i think the show would have been a little longer than a hour though . when you start contemplating extreme velocity you get into the theory of relativity , light speed , and time slowing down and such . starts to give me a head ache if i think about it to hard ! :wacko::D but i really do enjoy thier shows and they generally do a good job on calculating the hi-fi stuff but somtimes miss on the common sense stuff . i saw a show a while back on tracers igniting gas tanks where they stated it was the paint on the round that was ignited by friction with the air that caused the trace , :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Chatbox

    Load More
    You don't have permission to chat.
×
×
  • Create New...