rnemhrd 165 Posted December 15, 2011 Report Share Posted December 15, 2011 My head hurts....lol. Has anyone ever been nicked for non-compliance? I doubt it. Had a guy at the range ask me about my 30rnd mag in my 7.62 said it was'nt legal. Told him my gun was compliant and it was pre-ban. I only had it there to be sure it functioned in the gun. It only takes some nosey fucker that does'nt like the way you look to kick the hornets nest. Better safe than sorry in my book. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nailbomb 10,221 Posted December 15, 2011 Report Share Posted December 15, 2011 I'm digging the homemade floorplates guys. I'll probably do the same for that extra 922r part I'm missing. As much as I generaly hate using mags to reach compliance, I've gotten very comfortable with my current setups, and I won't change them if I can help it. Till then I guess I can only use my 10 round mags and SGM 2 round mag. Well... Accualy, I don't know if thats correct either. They did say pistol grips are sporting now, so maybe 922r is only in effect when I have the 10 round mags in anyway? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Scott Kenny 144 Posted December 15, 2011 Report Share Posted December 15, 2011 I love the spanish-marked home-made floorplates, but make SURE you say "hecho en Estados Unidos de America", NOT just "hecho en Estados Unidos" Estados Unidos de Mexico is the formal name of the country immediately to the south of the US. Ok, I guess I will be getting a HP op-rod and custom-length puck to go into the S12, along with the G2 and yugo-pattern wood furniture from Rhineland (and an Autoplug). Then whatever mag I care to play with, though I do like the idea of the 'braille' on the floorplates in the range bag. I think I may end up doing that on general principles, not for 922r stupidity. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gunfun 3,931 Posted December 15, 2011 Report Share Posted December 15, 2011 Well... Accualy, I don't know if thats correct either. They did say pistol grips are sporting now, so maybe 922r is only in effect when I have the 10 round mags in anyway? People keep saying this. Is this just relying on the defund thing, or is there some specific document this comes from. I can't seem to find it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rnemhrd 165 Posted December 15, 2011 Report Share Posted December 15, 2011 (edited) You doen't need to be 922r compliant unless you want to use high cap. mags do you? You can still use factory 5rd mags right? Thats what I thought. Hell all I have is 5rd mags. Edited December 15, 2011 by rnemhrd Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lbsrdi 1,078 Posted December 15, 2011 Report Share Posted December 15, 2011 You doen't need to be 922r compliant unless you want to use high cap. mags do you? You can still use factory 5rd mags right? Thats what I thought. Hell all I have is 5rd mags. Don't quote me on this, someone may correct me. I think having a folding stock also makes 922r apply. My advice is like others said, don't give them any reason to say you are not compliant. Better safe then sorry. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
netpackrat 566 Posted December 15, 2011 Report Share Posted December 15, 2011 though I do like the idea of the 'braille' on the floorplates in the range bag. I think I may end up doing that on general principles, not for 922r stupidity. Hey, that's not a "range bag" it's the Zombie Interdiction Bag: But yeah, my purpose in making my own floorplates was not to gain another US part, it was to have something that would take paint better than the original plastic ones, for color coding. My shotgun is compliant without them. Somebody else suggested that I add some means of distinguishing them in the dark, so I came up with the "braille" thing. Three smaller rivets for a buckshot mag, and one big one for slugs. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The_Caged_Bird 474 Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 To answer a question asked, No, to date not ONE person has been even charged with breaking 922r... I will be compliant with the new S-12 but only because I'm down with investing in America. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Iceberg 1 Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 To answer a question asked, No, to date not ONE person has been even charged with breaking 922r... I will be compliant with the new S-12 but only because I'm down with investing in America. Roger that; my CIII dealer/mfg told me today that 922r only applied to mfgs. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gunfun 3,931 Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 As I understood things though, if you significantly alter it you are effectively the manufacturer. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Scott Kenny 144 Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 Netpackrat, where'd you get the MHI patch? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
netpackrat 566 Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 (edited) Larry sells them; it was only like 3 bucks. larrycorreia.wordpress.com He's sometimes a little slow with orders. Edited December 16, 2011 by Netpackrat 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
diamondback 56 Posted December 16, 2011 Report Share Posted December 16, 2011 Nice, NetPackRat! Good to see another Cult of Correia member in the fold... I'm actually working on an Abomination build, if I can ever figure out the combined twist+flip on the bayonet. (Almost HAD it down with a lot of help from peeps here 'til LC threw that curveball... LOL) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
saigadd 9 Posted December 18, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 18, 2011 Stephen asked the question via email. I questioned the response and asked the question in writin and I posted the questions and answers. You're welcome. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
washburnizer 8 Posted December 18, 2011 Report Share Posted December 18, 2011 I'm good, but 922 is stupid. Really really stupid. Does not prevent any crime. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sKott 26 Posted December 19, 2011 Report Share Posted December 19, 2011 When I converted mine you only needed 5 parts to be compliant (FCG, Puck, PG - Done). As far as Im concerned I followed the law when it was converted. I am not about to tear it back apart because someone changed their mind on something 4 years later. They can Cram it. sKott Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ThinkingBuddha 0 Posted December 19, 2011 Report Share Posted December 19, 2011 Does 922r still apply to shotguns? The Fiscal Year 2012 Agriculture, Commerce/Justice/Science (CJS) and Transportation/Housing/Urban Development (THUD) Appropriations bills has a provision which seems to knock out 922r for shotguns. http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Read.aspx?ID=7180 Shotgun Importation Protections. Prohibits the Department of Justice from requiring imported shotguns to meet a “sporting purposes” test that theBureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE) has used to prohibit the importation of shotguns with one or more features disliked by the Agency, such as adjustable stocks, extended magazine tubes, etc. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GregM1 241 Posted December 19, 2011 Report Share Posted December 19, 2011 if they can bring the mka-1919 in with a pistol grip and 5 round mag, then i would presume using a saiga w PG & 5 rnd mag, you need not worry unless you have another feature they consider unsporting. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
macaholic 5 Posted December 24, 2011 Report Share Posted December 24, 2011 (edited) Sinse we have two recent cases where the court ruled that sporting pupose is null and void regarding firearms ownership, I don't know why the NRA doesn't simply take this 922r Bullshit to court and have it repealed! Edited December 24, 2011 by macaholic Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bigmegina 3 Posted December 25, 2011 Report Share Posted December 25, 2011 thank God these trivial laws dont apply to where i live. we can put anything we like, long barrel, short barrel, as long as the serial numbers match and we're pretty much GTG. oh but i forgot, we dont have aftermarket parts here so we tend to stay pretty much stock. i am so glad i live in the "Land Of the Free"where their are over 20,000 gun laws,and i guess thousands of would be felons,that do not even know they are breaking some of those 20,000 laws. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Gene 5.6 1 Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 (edited) Does 922r still apply to shotguns? The Fiscal Year 2012 Agriculture, Commerce/Justice/Science (CJS) and Transportation/Housing/Urban Development (THUD) Appropriations bills has a provision which seems to knock out 922r for shotguns. http://www.nraila.or...ad.aspx?ID=7180 Shotgun Importation Protections. Prohibits the Department of Justice from requiring imported shotguns to meet a “sporting purposes” test that theBureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE) has used to prohibit the importation of shotguns with one or more features disliked by the Agency, such as adjustable stocks, extended magazine tubes, etc. NEVERMIND! Just realized what date this thread was. >.>' It's 2012, not 2011. It's just the day matched up almost perfectly. Sorry! Edited January 8, 2012 by Gene 5.6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
saigadd 9 Posted April 17, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2012 (edited) Since there hasn't been much definitive info in detail (from BATF), regarding exactly what constitutes a muzzle device vs muzzle attachment... Information regarding muzzle attachments or devices - muzzle attachments are not mere thread protectors http://www.kwikrnu.c...0attachment.pdf Information regarding violating 922r - 922r applies to manufacturers not end users http://www.kwikrnu.c...%2010-17-11.pdf Edited April 17, 2012 by saigadd Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gunfun 3,931 Posted April 17, 2012 Report Share Posted April 17, 2012 Thank you for those. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jrance@iacwds.com 716 Posted April 17, 2012 Report Share Posted April 17, 2012 Since I had all of my S-12's & AK's built by gunsmiths I would assume that I am off the hook as far as 922r. If I read it correctly it involves the person who "manufactured" and not the individual in possession. Whatever, nothings getting changed. I'll continue to use Russian, Czech, Bulgarian and etc. magazines in whatever capacity and flavor I like. ) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pedal2alloy 206 Posted April 17, 2012 Report Share Posted April 17, 2012 The rules about parts count and sporting purpose are all un-constitutional. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Razr 23 Posted April 17, 2012 Report Share Posted April 17, 2012 I am down to 6 Foreign parts, 5, if I change out the Operating Rod for the Cadiz HD one I have. Malodave Does this rod is heavier than original? How does it affect bulk ammo ejection? How about Arsenal SGL rifles that had been built before new regulations? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ewoketeer 35 Posted April 18, 2012 Report Share Posted April 18, 2012 The rules about parts count and sporting purpose are all un-constitutional. True, but I'll pass on being the test case Quote Link to post Share on other sites
macaholic 5 Posted April 28, 2012 Report Share Posted April 28, 2012 (edited) I've said it before and I'll say it again. THIS 922 R BULLSHIT NEEDS TO BE REPEALED! And fuck all the parasites who dont want this bullshit law repealed in regards to the money they'll lose on conversions! Fucking Carpetbaggers! Edited April 29, 2012 by macaholic Quote Link to post Share on other sites
1200hd_cj 3 Posted April 28, 2012 Report Share Posted April 28, 2012 Do my shells count? They all say made in the U.S.A on the bottom. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.